Pac12 expansion - looking to add 4 teams

ralphiewvu said:
You are a bumbling contradiction of stupid. You proclaim you were talking about your school and only adding rivals. Now it's "natural rivals" and your school didn't add rivals.

The new PAC latest football add is USU. So tell me Mr "know everything" how a team (USU) that's 600 miles away from your school while only facing each other 4 times (3 when JFK was alive) is a natural rival?

If you don't want me to comment on this, stop being the delusional little shitbag spouting stupid and untrue things.
Click to expand...

I think he was referring to the game against Boise State and the addition of Gonzaga. Which will definitely be rivalries given the tradition with Gonzaga in hoops and the location of Boise State. I don't think there was anything stupid or untrue with what he said.
 
ericd7633 said:
I think he was referring to the game against Boise State and the addition of Gonzaga. Which will definitely be rivalries given the tradition with Gonzaga in hoops and the location of Boise State. I don't think there was anything stupid or untrue with what he said.
Click to expand...

Boise's coach is also from Eastern Washington, went to Wazzu and was an assistant at Gonzaga for over a decade.
 
ericd7633 said:
I think he was referring to the game against Boise State and the addition of Gonzaga. Which will definitely be rivalries given the tradition with Gonzaga in hoops and the location of Boise State. I don't think there was anything stupid or untrue with what he said.
Click to expand...
No he wasn't, he was referring to adding Idaho.(for Washington state because it's right across the border) He didn't wish to answer my question then made some asinine remark of only adding "natural rivals" to which is hilarious on that front when their last football add was USU. The whole thing was stupid because he didn't want to answer my question about Wyoming or New Mexico. The untrue stuff is saying UNLV is in the greatest realignment position ever or that anyone from the current B12 couldn't win this new mountain west esque PAC. But it's not shocking you didn't get that.
 
ralphiewvu said:
You are a bumbling contradiction of stupid. You proclaim you were talking about your school and only adding rivals. Now it's "natural rivals" and your school didn't add rivals.

The new PAC latest football add is USU. So tell me Mr "know everything" how a team (USU) that's 600 miles away from your school while only facing each other 4 times (3 when JFK was alive) is a natural rival?

If you don't want me to comment on this, stop being the delusional little shitbag spouting stupid and untrue things.
Click to expand...
Man I can’t help you if you can’t read. My school, added two natural rivals. What part don’t you get about my comment? Literally we added to rivals that we will be the little brother in. A normal person would read that as there two teams coming in that will become rivals of said team and said team is going to lose to them. I’m truly not sure where your disconnect is. Never once did I say we were only bringing in rivals. You and your little voices in your head should just walk away.

What nonsense am I spouting? I have spoken the truth with every single post about this specific topic because you are retarded on the subject. Like I’ve said run along or I can keep proving how dumb you are totally up to you
 
Wild Turkey said:
Big 12 is a pretty big stretch as they left out teams like Memphis and SMU. They will be targeting teams like FSU, Clemson, Gonzaga and some ACC teams when it blows up in 2036.

Never say never but UNLV is going to have to make series strides in FB and BB for the B12 to get interested. Remember they turned down Cal and Stanford.
Click to expand...
When did they turn down Cal and Stanford? I find it very hard to believe they turned down the Big 12
 
ralphiewvu said:
No he wasn't, he was referring to adding Idaho.(for Washington state because it's right across the border) He didn't wish to answer my question then made some asinine remark of only adding "natural rivals" to which is hilarious on that front when their last football add was USU. The whole thing was stupid because he didn't want to answer my question about Wyoming or New Mexico. The untrue stuff is saying UNLV is in the greatest realignment position ever or that anyone from the current B12 couldn't win this new mountain west esque PAC. But it's not shocking you didn't get that.
Click to expand...
I answered your question. It’s not my fault you’re a retard. Go back and read my comment really slowly, possibly have a neighbor help you read it.
 
Hitman Hart said:
My favorite thing about these expansion threads is that nobody knows shit but here we are 24 pages later
Click to expand...
Oh come on now. From the get go I was right about everything except those sellouts from Vegas. Though my prediction of an all state sponsorship is probably out the window
 
wazzu31 said:
Man I can’t help you if you can’t read. My school, added two natural rivals. What part don’t you get about my comment? Literally we added to rivals that we will be the little brother in. A normal person would read that as there two teams coming in that will become rivals of said team and said team is going to lose to them. I’m truly not sure where your disconnect is. Never once did I say we were only bringing in rivals. You and your little voices in your head should just walk away.

What nonsense am I spouting? I have spoken the truth with every single post about this specific topic because you are retarded on the subject. Like I’ve said run along or I can keep proving how dumb you are totally up to you
Click to expand...
I ask about Wyoming and UNM, your response: THATS NOT A RIVAL. I mention the budding "rivalries" CSU and USU have with everyone and you say "I MEANT MY SCHOOL."

Suddenly you want to get specific and name the number and change rivalries to "natural" rivalries all the while suddenly you didn't mean your school or not adding rivalries??

You are a flip flopping fuckstick that can't take his program got downgraded.

Let's try this again, what happened with Wyoming and UNM? They seem like they'd be good adds.
 
wazzu31 said:
I answered your question. It’s not my fault you’re a retard. Go back and read my comment really slowly, possibly have a neighbor help you read it.
Click to expand...
No, you didn't. You have some sort of half ass response for Wazzou.
 
ralphiewvu said:
No he wasn't, he was referring to adding Idaho.(for Washington state because it's right across the border) He didn't wish to answer my question then made some asinine remark of only adding "natural rivals" to which is hilarious on that front when their last football add was USU. The whole thing was stupid because he didn't want to answer my question about Wyoming or New Mexico. The untrue stuff is saying UNLV is in the greatest realignment position ever or that anyone from the current B12 couldn't win this new mountain west esque PAC. But it's not shocking you didn't get that.
Click to expand...

Yes, I know. Which would be an additional natural rival with Washington State, on top of already added Boise State and Gonzaga. He never mentioned Utah State. He said Saturday (Boise State game) and today (referencing Gonzaga being added on Tuesday)
 
ericd7633 said:
Yes, I know. Which would be an additional natural rival with Washington State, on top of already added Boise State and Gonzaga. He never mentioned Utah State. He said Saturday (Boise State game) and today (referencing Gonzaga being added on Tuesday)
Click to expand...
This latest dispute didn't start until Tuesday. I only mentioned USU after I was told Wyoming and UNM weren't rivals. He then goes on this stupid ass rant flip flopping about rivals added or not added all the while still not answering my question about Wyoming and UNM. This is why we are here now.
 
wazzu31 said:
I really want Idaho to be the final member. Cause shit, after Saturday and today, we get two new natural rivals that we are the little brother in
Click to expand...
ralphiewvu said:
This latest dispute didn't start until Tuesday. I only mentioned USU after I was told Wyoming and UNM weren't rivals. He then goes on this stupid ass rant flip flopping about rivals added or not added all the while still not answering my question about Wyoming and UNM. This is why we are here now.
Click to expand...

What he said was at the top. He's referencing the Boise State game and adding in Gonzaga. Those are "natural rivals" that he's talking about. Wyoming and New Mexico aren't rivals. They've added two "natural rivals", which was all he referenced. And then was hoping to add a 3rd in Idaho, which is obviously much more of a natural rival then New Mexico, Utah State, or Wyoming.
 
ericd7633 said:
What he said was at the top. He's referencing the Boise State game and adding in Gonzaga. Those are "natural rivals" that he's talking about. Wyoming and New Mexico aren't rivals. They've added two "natural rivals", which was all he referenced. And then was hoping to add a 3rd in Idaho, which is obviously much more of a natural rival then New Mexico, Utah State, or Wyoming.
Click to expand...
I asked about Wyoming and New Mexico and got the response of they aren't rivals. I then referenced usu not being a rival and this dude went off. No one is arguing Idaho isn't a natural rival to wazzou or even Boise.
 
ralphiewvu said:
This latest dispute didn't start until Tuesday. I only mentioned USU after I was told Wyoming and UNM weren't rivals. He then goes on this stupid ass rant flip flopping about rivals added or not added all the while still not answering my question about Wyoming and UNM. This is why we are here now.
Click to expand...
No you are dumb dude. Hear let me explain slowly the post in your dumbed down language

Boise State is going to be in the new Pac 12. Ok, now Boise State isn’t that far from the school. Ok so that means they would be a natural rival. Are you with me?

Ok, sound now Gonzaga is going to be in the Pac 12, which is when I posted. Ok now, Spokane is right up the road from Pullman and we have a bunch of alums who live there. Ok so that means they would be a natural. Still got it little fella?

Ok this part is going to blow your mind. Gonzaga, they are named the Bulldogs right. And they play this sport called basketball right. Ok then we got this school name Boise State, they are the Broncos right, they play this sport called football.

Ok, this is going to super duper do a number on your itty bitty brain. So the school that plays the basketball thingy is a lot better than we are at it. And Saturday night the team that plays football boat raced us right. Are you still with me? Ok, so there is this school 8 miles down the road from our campus, named Idaho. So when I said WE invited two rivals that WE are the little brother now in, could we invite Idaho so at least we would be the superior partner in a rivalry. Do you get it or should I have my child talk to you at your level?
 
ralphiewvu said:
I ask about Wyoming and UNM, your response: THATS NOT A RIVAL. I mention the budding "rivalries" CSU and USU have with everyone and you say "I MEANT MY SCHOOL."

Suddenly you want to get specific and name the number and change rivalries to "natural" rivalries all the while suddenly you didn't mean your school or not adding rivalries??

You are a flip flopping fuckstick that can't take his program got downgraded.

Let's try this again, what happened with Wyoming and UNM? They seem like they'd be good adds.
Click to expand...
Because CSU and USU have literally nothing to do with my post. What part do you not understand? I can’t explain that any clearer.

I changed it to natural rivals because that is what they are? Is there a different phrasing in your part of the country that I don’t know to explain what a rival would be?

You keep saying downgraded as if that is suppose to offend me or something. You already embarrassed yourself with that line of thinking so I’m not sure why you keep doubling down on idiocy
 
ralphiewvu said:
I asked about Wyoming and New Mexico and got the response of they aren't rivals. I then referenced usu not being a rival and this dude went off. No one is arguing Idaho isn't a natural rival to wazzou or even Boise.
Click to expand...
Wyoming and New Mexico aren’t rivals to my school nor are they in the conference. So now you are just making up arguments in your head and puking it out on this thread.
 
wazzu31 said:
No you are dumb dude. Hear let me explain slowly the post in your dumbed down language

Boise State is going to be in the new Pac 12. Ok, now Boise State isn’t that far from the school. Ok so that means they would be a natural rival. Are you with me?

Ok, sound now Gonzaga is going to be in the Pac 12, which is when I posted. Ok now, Spokane is right up the road from Pullman and we have a bunch of alums who live there. Ok so that means they would be a natural. Still got it little fella?

Ok this part is going to blow your mind. Gonzaga, they are named the Bulldogs right. And they play this sport called basketball right. Ok then we got this school name Boise State, they are the Broncos right, they play this sport called football.

Ok, this is going to super duper do a number on your itty bitty brain. So the school that plays the basketball thingy is a lot better than we are at it. And Saturday night the team that plays football boat raced us right. Are you still with me? Ok, so there is this school 8 miles down the road from our campus, named Idaho. So when I said WE invited two rivals that WE are the little brother now in, could we invite Idaho so at least we would be the superior partner in a rivalry. Do you get it or should I have my child talk to you at your level?
Click to expand...
I don't need 5 paragraphs to explain how much of a fucking moron you are. I asked about Wyoming and UNM. You said not rivals and "my school". I then illustrated how USU isn't a rival either. And here you are bringing up Boise and Gonzaga, which were never in question to be your rivals.

You are a fucking imbecile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top