Need more info, but I’d go with more hits and lower average since that probably means you played longer and made more money
Think you got what I said mixed upDoes it though? I know that we don't have the total plate appearance numbers since there's info missing but the .287 batter would have had almost 1,300 more ABs, even if he walked a lot less frequently I would still probably guess that he played for at least as long as the .302 batter did.
This might be a "this is what happens if you turn a bunch of so-and-so's walks into singles" type of question/exercise? Not really sure yet.
Think you got what I said mixed up
And .300 is a benchmark.3000 hits is a milestone.
Next question.
Time to give everyone who went 1-for-1 and a 1.000 a bust in the hall of fame then, eh?And .300 is a benchmark.
So, try again
So, you get to take steroids with option B too?stat line A most closely aligns with Al Oliver
stat line B most closely aligns with Rafael Palmeiro
lol, yeah and what are their WAR?What's the OBP or OPS of each?
These are qualified stats. Try to keep up with normal human conversation.Time to give everyone who went 1-for-1 and a 1.000 a bust in the hall of fame then, eh?
why post a dumb question if you already know your own answer?These are qualified stats. Try to keep up with normal human conversation.
How many do you think have .300+ and over 2500 hits?I'll take the years and extra pension over the few extra points.
Only 33 people have 3k hits in MLB. Give me exclusivity any day.
That’s what a poll is… to gather others’ opinions and foster debate. Again, try to keep upwhy post a dumb question if you already know your own answer?
Well there are 100 players with 2500 hits and scanning the list there are a lot more than 33 that have .300+ average.How many do you think have .300+ and over 2500 hits?