GAME Scrub Night: Ohio St vs Minnesota

Red_Alert said:
Per the 'experts' Nebraska has higher rated recruiting classes than anyone in the West on average.

The same 'experts' that tell you Ohio St, Clemson, Alabama, etc have Top 5 recruiting classes.

Are you an 'expert' or just a lazy ass who runs her yapper without taking two minutes to do a lil research before looking like a tool?
Click to expand...

Too bad most of the guys at the top end transferred and your talent pool is way lower than the rankings. Add to that your coaches have done a shit job at development and you have a less talented team. All those 3 and 4 TD blowouts we put on you can't be the Huskers just stepping on their dicks...some of it has to do with talent on the teams...
 
Red_Alert said:
Per the 'experts' they have higher rated recruiting classes on average.

The same 'experts' that tell you Ohio St, Clemson, Alabama, etc have Top 5 recruiting classes.

Are you an 'expert' or just a lazy ass who runs her yapper without taking two minutes to do a lil research before looking like a tool?
Click to expand...

Having higher rated recruits does not equal higher rated talent their entire career. Witness 3-star Jonathan Taylor.
 
Red_Alert said:
Per the 'experts' Nebraska has higher rated recruiting classes than anyone in the West on average.

The same 'experts' that tell you Ohio St, Clemson, Alabama, etc have Top 5 recruiting classes.

Are you an 'expert' or just a lazy ass who runs her yapper without taking two minutes to do a lil research before looking like a tool?
Click to expand...
Flipping channels and saw Tim Beck is OC for N. Carolina St.. They looked pretty decent on O.
 
Moab said:
Too bad most of the guys at the top end transferred and you're talent pool is way lower than the rankings.
Click to expand...

Post up the last 4/5 years recruiting rankings of the Big 10 West or get back in your mommy's basement.

chop chop
 
Red_Alert said:
Post up the last 4/5 years recruiting rankings of the Big 10 West or get back in your mommy's basement.

chop chop
Click to expand...
Ok, now go back and read the edit...I typed really slow to help you understand
 
Kburjr said:
Having higher rated recruits does not equal higher rated talent their entire career. Witness 3-star Jonathan Taylor.
Click to expand...

Correct.

If they're not being developed they'll suck.
If they're not disciplined they'll suck.

It's a coaching issue.

Help your ignorant friend Moab.
 
Red_Alert said:
Correct.

If they're not being developed they'll suck.
If they're not disciplined they'll suck.

It's a coaching issue.

Help your ignorant friend Moab.
Click to expand...

Ultimately, that is where the blame settles. But it is not all development. Sometimes, it is about talent evaluation. It doesn't help to recruit pass-catching TEs when your offense is based on run blocking TEs.
 
Red_Alert said:
Post 'em up or STFU, lady.
Click to expand...

Are you really this stupid? Those kids may have been ranked as having more talent when they came out of high school, but unlike the other schools Nebraska competes against they didn't develop that talent. So while they may have been deemed to have more talent by your "experts", the results show that they end up less talented.

It's pretty simple, if Nebraska has so much talent recruited why can't they be consistently good? Is it because they're not being developed into high end CFB players or is it because they're maybe not as talented as your experts claim? Why isn't that talent translating to wins on the field? Reality tells me that they're not being developed and the other teams that are kicking your ass on the regular are more talented.

You can take your ITG routine and shove it, you don't impress anybody.
 
Kburjr said:
Ultimately, that is where the blame settles. But it is not all development. Sometimes, it is about talent evaluation. It doesn't help to recruit pass-catching TEs when your offense is based on run blocking TEs.
Click to expand...
that is still a coaching thing if you're recruiting the wrong guys
 
Kburjr said:
Ultimately, that is where the blame settles. But it is not all development. Sometimes, it is about talent evaluation. It doesn't help to recruit pass-catching TEs when your offense is based on run blocking TEs.
Click to expand...

It's the 'experts' doing the evaluating and providing the stars.
 
Moab said:
Are you really this stupid? Those kids may have been ranked as having more talent when they came out of high school, but unlike the other schools Nebraska competes against they didn't develop that talent. So while they may have been deemed to have more talent by your "experts", the results show that they end up less talented.

It's pretty simple, if Nebraska has so much talent recruited why can't they be consistently good? Is it because they're not being developed into high end CFB players or is it because they're maybe not as talented as your experts claim? Why isn't that talent translating to wins on the field? Reality tells me that they're not being developed and the other teams that are kicking your ass on the regular are more talented.

You can take your ITG routine and shove it, you don't impress anybody.
Click to expand...

I told you to post 'em up bitch.

Last 4/5 years recruiting rankings, not a bunch of bitch lip.

Get to it right now.
 
Fuck right off
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top