Shane's NFL Bucket & Cap Draft : CHAT

Double check your team. I might be good at math but ai never said I was good at math on my phone
 
I have $2 in bucket 6 if anyone wants to trade
 
Just wanna say again, not a fan of trading money. We should change the name of the draft to bucket & not a cap.

Not trying to single you out Shane but this makes the draft dumb.


TRADES: Trades $3 from bucket 6 to Nos for $2 from bucket 4 and $1 from bucket 3
Trades $1 from Bucket 3 to Smitty for $1 from Bucket 5
Trades $2 from bucket 1 to 500 for $2 from bucket 6
Trades $3 in bucket 8 to The Gorn for $1 in bucket 2 and $2 in bucket 4
Trades $1 in bucket 3 and $1 in bucket 8 to @UK Cowboy for $2 in bucket 6
Trades $1 from bucket 3 to Sushi for $1 from bucket 4


Why even have a cap as a restriction?

Oh and I did text 500
 
Nosferatu said:
Just wanna say again, not a fan of trading money. We should change the name of the draft to bucket & not a cap.

Not trying to single you out Shane but this makes the draft dumb.


TRADES: Trades $3 from bucket 6 to Nos for $2 from bucket 4 and $1 from bucket 3
Trades $1 from Bucket 3 to Smitty for $1 from Bucket 5
Trades $2 from bucket 1 to 500 for $2 from bucket 6
Trades $3 in bucket 8 to The Gorn for $1 in bucket 2 and $2 in bucket 4
Trades $1 in bucket 3 and $1 in bucket 8 to @UK Cowboy for $2 in bucket 6
Trades $1 from bucket 3 to Sushi for $1 from bucket 4


Why even have a cap as a restriction?

Oh and I did text 500
Click to expand...
I asked before if we needed a rule to restrict how many times we traded cap. If we don't have a rule, take advantage of it.

There are lot of things I would change about this draft.
I would have included more current players so put a cap on players salary and changed minimum games back to seasons or games played. The whole point of these drafts is to include more current players.

Too many restrictions imo.
 
If we were to do another one of these for NBA or NHL I would suggest no trading cap but with less restrictions as a whole
 
Shanemansj13 said:
I asked before if we needed a rule to restrict how many times we traded cap. If we don't have a rule, take advantage of it.

There are lot of things I would change about this draft.
I would have included more current players so put a cap on players salary and changed minimum games back to seasons or games played. The whole point of these drafts is to include more current players.

Too many restrictions imo.
Click to expand...


I think I made myself clear in the fact I have never liked trading money.

I've never liked mixing current players and long retired players.

That's not the point of the drafts for me, i've been against it since day 1

Just my opinion but there is not too many restrictions, we have done 100 free for all drafts, restrictions are what keep us from doing the same draft over and over.

I have enjoyed this draft quite a bit, I just don't like that we can just trade around the cap restriction.

I don't recall you asking about putting a limit on trading money but you're right that should have been done.

Okay, so we need to make some player trades!!! Offer me something!
 
Shanemansj13 said:
If we were to do another one of these for NBA or NHL I would suggest no trading cap but with less restrictions as a whole
Click to expand...


What other restriction are you talking about? Buckets and games played? We have always had a minimum game played rule.
 
Nosferatu said:
I think I made myself clear in the fact I have never liked trading money.

I've never liked mixing current players and long retired players.

That's not the point of the drafts for me, i've been against it since day 1

Just my opinion but there is not too many restrictions, we have done 100 free for all drafts, restrictions are what keep us from doing the same draft over and over.

I have enjoyed this draft quite a bit, I just don't like that we can just trade around the cap restriction.

I don't recall you asking about putting a limit on trading money but you're right that should have been done.

Okay, so we need to make some player trades!!! Offer me something!
Click to expand...
Yeah but you have to admit trading cap is something different and we can only do it on cap drafts. The fact is we should have set a limit on them if we are including them.

At this point, it's extremely hard to do player trades but possible lol
 
Nosferatu said:
What other restriction are you talking about? Buckets and games played? We have always had a minimum game played rule.
Click to expand...
64 in NFL limits most players to basically one team. For baseball it's different, even basetball but most football players have shorter careers. Also, including current players is a change of pace and it should be included at times but I get separating current with past players. Good to mix it up though.
 
Shanemansj13 said:
64 in NFL limits most players to basically one team. For baseball it's different, even basetball but most football players have shorter careers. Also, including current players is a change of pace and it should be included at times but I get separately current with past players. Good to mix it up though.
Click to expand...


I agree 64 was too many. I have 15 players on my team and NONE of them qualify for more than one team.
 
Charles Haley who played more than a decade in the NFL barely qualified at all. He started 64 games with the Niners.
 
I honestly think if it was 48 instead of 64 that would have opened things up a lot. It was pretty shocking the difference of only 16 games
 
Nosferatu said:
Charles Haley who played more than a decade in the NFL barely qualified at all. He started 64 games with the Niners.
Click to expand...
Yep there were quite a bit I found. They played for 3 or 4 teams or more but either didn't qualify for any teams or barely enough for one team
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top