Texas and Oklahoma to the SEC

How long?

  • Year 1

    Votes: 6 26.1%

  • Within the first 3-5 seasons

    Votes: 9 39.1%

  • At LEAST 10 years

    Votes: 6 26.1%

  • Texas BBQ style potato salad

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
outofyourmind said:
The BIG and the PAC and ACC ought to be making some serious phone calls today.

Just waiting around is stupid.
Click to expand...
Especially since it sounds like Mizzou and A&M would nix Texas. If one more (Arkansas?) is a no they can't join, right?

That'd put them in a pretty tough spot.
 
Huskers4me said:
Will laugh my ass off if OU & UT don’t get into the SEC especially since Missouri got in. It’s like tripping on the low bar and face planting.
Click to expand...


I guess we'll just keep adding to our 50 Conference Championships every year then.

It's a tough gig.
 
duckboy33 said:
ND either stays independent or joins the ACC. The writing is on the wall
Click to expand...
ND stays the same or changes... you should've saved that for the Bold Prediction thread.



I know your point was to say the B1G isn't in contention, so please don't try to explain it.
 
outofyourmind said:
How is that no Texas or OU thing working out for you guys??
Click to expand...
Excited Season 4 GIF by Parks and Recreation
 
outofyourmind said:
I guess we'll just keep adding to our 50 Conference Championships every year then.

It's a tough gig.
Click to expand...
Guess it won't really matter if there is expanded playoffs. OU should be happy where they are. Must be Texas telling them what to do.
 
Why does OU follow Texas around like a bitch in heat? Texas isn't going to cancel the game, it's still big for them. Texas could join whatever conference or go independent, they would still play OU.
 
steelerssb said:
Especially since it sounds like Mizzou and A&M would nix Texas. If one more (Arkansas?) is a no they can't join, right?

That'd put them in a pretty tough spot.
Click to expand...
IMHO, the vote would have been sounded out through back channels long before the discussions got really serious and public.
 
1st question from B10 media days was about the Texas and OU situation. Seems to leave it super open.
 
batchaps4me said:
IMHO, the vote would have been sounded out through back channels long before the discussions got really serious and public.
Click to expand...
You are assuming there isn't a "but we're Texas, everyone wants us and loves us" attitude in Austin. No doubt they don't feel the need to even question if they would be let in. They are that full of themselves.
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
ND stays the same or changes... you should've saved that for the Bold Prediction thread.



I know your point was to say the B1G isn't in contention, so please don't try to explain it.
Click to expand...

Correct. The post was in response to a ND to the Big Ten proposal. At least you understood the point, that gives you a leg up on some of the SEC folk
 
fordman84 said:
You are assuming there isn't a "but we're Texas, everyone wants us and loves us" attitude in Austin. No doubt they don't feel the need to even question if they would be let in. They are that full of themselves.
Click to expand...
I had this thought as well, especially because this started from Texas' camp.
 
fordman84 said:
You are assuming there isn't a "but we're Texas, everyone wants us and loves us" attitude in Austin. No doubt they don't feel the need to even question if they would be let in. They are that full of themselves.
Click to expand...
I am operating on the premise that neither conferences nor teams want to be publicly left at the alter, so to speak.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top