- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 29,602
- Reaction score
- 60,663
- Bookie:
- $ 5,533.00
- Location
- SoCal. The Promised Land.
tOfficial PAC-12 Thread
- Thread starter Thiefery
- Start date
trojanfan12
Super Moderator
USC with a nice recruiting day.
Landed Ceyaire Wright, 4 star CB and #7 at his position in the country and Korey Foreman, 5 star DL and the #1 recruit in the nation.
Landed Ceyaire Wright, 4 star CB and #7 at his position in the country and Korey Foreman, 5 star DL and the #1 recruit in the nation.
trojanfan12
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 11,314
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
I think he bulked up too much.. he got chased down from behind after having a 12 yard head start.. then fumbled the ball at the one yard line two plays later vs TCU. I like him and think he's a solid back but his stay here will be known for that and him dropping a wide open pass vs LSU in '19 early in the game. He also had some trouble with injuries but I think it's because they added so much weight on him.
I do wish him the best and SC is a great place for a fresh start.
trojanfan12
Super Moderator
Good to hear. Thanks. USC just lost Markese Stepp. Looks like he and Ingram are about the same size. I'm hoping this means that USC is going to look to run the ball more next year.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 11,314
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
he always has shown flashes of what he can do, unfortunately he just wasn't consistent here at Texas. His body should finally be healthy once again heading into spring practices. Just watch the alamo bowl vs Utah..kid flashed and hopefully it works out for him.. because I loved him coming out of HS
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 4,326
- Reaction score
- 2,024
- Bookie:
- $ 7,613.00
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00
Top 5 Recruiting in the PAC since 2010:
2021:
1. Oregon
2. USC
3. California
4. UCLA
5. Utah
2020:
1. Oregon
2. Washington
3. Stanford
4. Arizona State
5. Utah
2019:
1. Oregon
2. Washington
3. Stanford
4. USC
5. Arizona State
2018:
1. USC
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. UCLA
5. Utah
2017:
1. USC
2. Stanford
3. Oregon
4. UCLA
5. Washington
2016:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Stanford
4. Arizona State
5. Oregon
2015:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Oregon
4. Arizona State
5. Stanford
2014:
1. USC
2. Stanford
3. UCLA
4. Oregon
5. Arizona State
2013:
1. UCLA
2. USC
3. Washington
4. Oregon
5. Arizona State
2012:
1. Stanford
2. USC
3. Oregon
4. UCLA
5. Washington
2011:
1. USC
2. Oregon
3. California
4. Stanford
5. Washington
2010:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Oregon
4. Washington
5. California
2021:
1. Oregon
2. USC
3. California
4. UCLA
5. Utah
2020:
1. Oregon
2. Washington
3. Stanford
4. Arizona State
5. Utah
2019:
1. Oregon
2. Washington
3. Stanford
4. USC
5. Arizona State
2018:
1. USC
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. UCLA
5. Utah
2017:
1. USC
2. Stanford
3. Oregon
4. UCLA
5. Washington
2016:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Stanford
4. Arizona State
5. Oregon
2015:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Oregon
4. Arizona State
5. Stanford
2014:
1. USC
2. Stanford
3. UCLA
4. Oregon
5. Arizona State
2013:
1. UCLA
2. USC
3. Washington
4. Oregon
5. Arizona State
2012:
1. Stanford
2. USC
3. Oregon
4. UCLA
5. Washington
2011:
1. USC
2. Oregon
3. California
4. Stanford
5. Washington
2010:
1. USC
2. UCLA
3. Oregon
4. Washington
5. California
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 28,927
- Reaction score
- 43,768
- Bookie:
- $ 27,500.00
- Location
- Fence Rider Extraordinaire
Top 5 recruiting in the Big 12 since 2010
Just sayin'.........
2020
1. tejas (7-3)
2. Oklahoma
3. TCU
4. West Virginia
5. Oklahoma St
2019
1. tejas (8-5)
2. Oklahoma
3. TCU
4. Baylor
5. Oklahoma St
2018
1. tejas (10-4)
2. Oklahoma
3. TCU
4. Baylor
5. Oklahoma St
2017
1. Oklahoma
2. tejas (7-6)
3. TCU
4. Oklahoma St
5. Baylor
2016
1. tejas (5-7)
2. Oklahoma
3. TCU
4. West Virginia
5. Baylor
2015
1. tejas (5-7)
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas Tech
4. West Virginia
5. Baylor
2014
1. Oklahoma
2. tejas (6-7)
3. Baylor
4. Oklahoma St
5. West Virginia
2013
1. Oklahoma
2. Tejas (8-5)
3. Baylor
4. West Virginia
5. Oklahoma St
2012
1. tejas (9-4)
2. Oklahoma
3. Baylor
4. Texas Tech
5. TCU
2011
1. tejas (8-5)
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas Tech
4. Oklahoma St
5. TCU
2010
1. tejas (5-7)
2. Oklahoma
3. Texas A&M
4. Missouri
5. Oklahoma St
8 times with the number 1 class
3 times with the number 2 class
Average: 1.2
Overall record: (78-60)
Win percentage: 56.5%
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 10,041
- Reaction score
- 13,367
- Bookie:
- $ 1,355.00
So, let me get this straight. You are saying nobody underachieves like tejas. NOBODY!!!?
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 11,314
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
lol my man @Angry Red wishes his Huskers could underachieve like Texas..at least signing days are pretty cool
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Posts
- 692
- Reaction score
- 317
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
I really do.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Posts
- 692
- Reaction score
- 317
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Is Markese Stepp worthy of being the lead back? I like his size and film, which is good for the B1G. A hard runner, but I wonder how long he stays healthy.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Posts
- 692
- Reaction score
- 317
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Man I'd love to have Texas recruiting rankings, but not necessarily the players. Texas high school football has too many Divas. It seems quite a few of them have reached their maximum athletic ability beyond gaining strength. Otherwise, Texas gets players every year that many schools want. I would love to have Texas current level of success. I have been humbled as a fan
trojanfan12
Super Moderator
He should be okay healthwise. His biggest problem was that our o-line sucked and Harrell is allergic to run plays.
We had a couple of other pretty good backs too. There just weren't enough carries for any of our RB's to ever really show what they can do.
Did you realize it has been an entire generation since Nebraska was relevant in college football, but 3 generations of them being obsessed with Texas.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00
There's been a lot of talk about the top talent on the west coast leaving the PAC 12. Here are where the 4/5 star 2021 recruits from PAC 12 states (Plus Nevada) went.
California:
USC - 11
Oregon - 5
California - 3
Michigan - 2
Utah - 2
Notre Dame - 1
Clemson - 1
Georgia - 1
Arizona State - 1
Texas - 1
UCLA - 1
San Diego State - 1
Oregon:
Oregon - 1
Oklahoma - 1
Washington:
Washington - 4
Ohio State - 1
USC - 1
Arizona State - 1
Louisville - 1
Arizona:
Oregon - 3
Ohio State - 1
UCLA - 1
California - 1
Minnesota - 1
Colorado:
Oregon - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Utah:
Oregon - 3
USC - 1
BYU - 1
Nevada:
Oregon - 1
Michigan State - 1
UCLA - 1
California:
USC - 11
Oregon - 5
California - 3
Michigan - 2
Utah - 2
Notre Dame - 1
Clemson - 1
Georgia - 1
Arizona State - 1
Texas - 1
UCLA - 1
San Diego State - 1
Oregon:
Oregon - 1
Oklahoma - 1
Washington:
Washington - 4
Ohio State - 1
USC - 1
Arizona State - 1
Louisville - 1
Arizona:
Oregon - 3
Ohio State - 1
UCLA - 1
California - 1
Minnesota - 1
Colorado:
Oregon - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Utah:
Oregon - 3
USC - 1
BYU - 1
Nevada:
Oregon - 1
Michigan State - 1
UCLA - 1
trojanfan12
Super Moderator
While I think it's a bit overblown, it's not entirely inaccurate. It got really loud last season when USC finished with the 64th ranked recruiting class and couldn't seem to land many California recruits.
I'm a bit surprised that UCLA only landed 1 California recruit. I know most California recruits will pick USC over UCLA if they have the choice. But I would think they should be able to get more than the 5 Oregon got or at least the 2 that Michigan got.
For the PAC, it's always been about keeping the California recruits on the West Coast and in PAC-12 programs.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00
Chip Kelly has not had much luck on the recruiting trail at UCLA. It was well known that he didn’t enjoy recruiting while he was at Oregon
trojanfan12
Super Moderator
That's true. Also, if memory serves, he tends to look for guys who fit his system and doesn't really worry too much about things like star ratings.
Either way, it looks like it's starting to work. UCLA was better than most expected this year.