- Joined
- Sep 21, 2020
- Posts
- 5,255
- Reaction score
- 4,834
- Bookie:
- $ 42,465.00


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think they lose on neutral field?And Alabama above both of them?
Possibly.Do you think they lose on neutral field?
Oregon lost to Stanford
Ohio State could have lost to Nebraska.
Possibly.
Alabama lost to Texas A&M. Georgia almost lost to Clemson.
I think it is more of a toss up this season than they have since CFP began.
Not an argument for 12 teams.It's UGA and then everyone else.
The advantage of being in the 2 vs 3 game instead of being in the 4 spot against UGA is huge.
Not an argument for 12 teams.
4 is more than enough.
Yawn12 teams is too many. If it expands, 8 is enough.
Id take both over Bama honestly. OSU by a wide margin. Those WRs vs that secondary?Do you think they lose on neutral field?
Oregon lost to Stanford
Ohio State could have lost to Nebraska.
Yawn
4 is plenty.
BCS got it wrong badly at least once.I will say I like 4-team CFP better than BCS system, but I liked BCS rankings better than Committee rankings.
BCS got it wrong badly at least once.
Committee has never gotten wrong.
However if BCS ratings were expanded to 4 I doubt it misses.
2004Which year was that?
Willie Aames agrees with you.12 teams is too many. If it expands, 8 is enough.
2004
One thing I find more important than 4 or more team tourney is how they determine the ranking.BCS got it wrong badly at least once.
Committee has never gotten wrong.
However if BCS ratings were expanded to 4 I doubt it misses.
Auburn wins the final.Of course you would pick that year.
2 most deserving teams went. SEC was trash that season.