UGA Texas week

Correct. I know which one showed up for our game and it wasn't the one at either of those games.

mmmmhhmmm

So which (1-5) Mississippi St team showed up @ Georgia for a 10 pt loss last Saturday?

The one that lost at home to Toledo 41-17?

I know, I know, It's SEC. It just means more.
 
Looking at this with Dawg colored glasses, I respect Texas. They have a lot of talent, a really good coach, and they will have home field advantage. All that said, here is why I like the Dawgs for Saturday:

- We've played a tougher schedule thus far: Clemson, Bama, @Kentucky. That game against Bama on the road will pay dividends his week as your guys have been in a super-charged situation and had to fight back. Texas not so much.

- Look at the Ds that Texas has faced:

UGA: 20th ppg / 28th ypg / 39th pass ypg

OK: 27th / 48th / 77th
Mich: 56th / 44th / 111th
MSU: 117th / 125th / 115th
UTSA: 108th / 85th / 128th
ULM: 32nd / 53rd / 37th
CSU: 100th / 104th / 120th

- Let's look at the Os Texas has faced:

Dawgs rank: 35th ppg / 28th ypg / 9th pass ypg

MSU: 71st ppg / 78th ypg / 46th pass ypg
UTSA: 105th / 67th / 45th
CSU: 107th / 86th / 102nd
ULM: 105th / 127th / 130th
OK: 96th / 125th / 123rd
MICH: 102nd / 119th / 131st

So, Texas is going to see O and D that they haven't faced yet.

That said, this UGA team is not what it has been in the past, especially on the D. Our DBs are not playing well, and with Ewers and the TX WRs, that's ungood. I don't think either team is running the ball all that well. TX has their top RBs out, we have 2 or our 3 top RBs out, and our OL has not run blocked well at all.

To win, our DBs have to play well, which means we have to find a way to pressure Ewers. That's a tough assignment, as we've not done a lot of that this year. Our OL has to protect Beck, something they done a better job of the last few games. And then Beck has to not turn the ball over.

I am guessing we throw the ball 40-50 times, which is something that we normally don't do
Texas has played DFEI #7 Mich and #10 OU
UGa has played DFEI #13 BAMA and #19 UK

I can’t defend the offenses they have played.
 
giphy.gif
 
wait I thought it was Seven win Steve/Sark.. ??? Not 6 win steve.. by the way..NU wish they could have won 6 games the past 7 years right?? @Red_Alert ???
 
mmmmhhmmm

So which (1-5) Mississippi St team showed up @ Georgia for a 10 pt loss last Saturday?

The one that lost at home to Toledo 41-17?

I know, I know, It's SEC. It just means more.
Again, you want to rely on the transitive property of CFB - everyone knows that doesn't exist. By your post you believe that Toledo would beat UGA? You know better than that. As I clearly stated, each game stands on its own and can be off for different reasons.
 
wait I thought it was Seven win Steve/Sark.. ??? Not 6 win steve.. by the way..NU wish they could have won 6 games the past 7 years right?? @Red_Alert ???
Cutty Sark was always his best nickname. That’s not a knock. I never criticize anyone for drinking. Drinking is my favorite thing to do.
 
Texas has played DFEI #7 Mich and #10 OU
UGa has played DFEI #13 BAMA and #19 UK

I can’t defend the offenses they have played.
Keep in mind that I am not saying those numbers mean we win. I am pointing out that you haven't played very good teams. Maybe that doesn't matter ... we've been accused of playing weak schedules in the past and then kicked the shit out of good teams. I am simply putting it out there that I think you will see more competition on both sides of the ball than you have so far.

Not sure why the DFEI rankings are so different from the ones I used. Candidly, can't tell you where I got mine from.
 
wait I thought it was Seven win Steve/Sark.. ??? Not 6 win steve.. by the way..NU wish they could have won 6 games the past 7 years right?? @Red_Alert ???

You're right.

Six/Seven both start with an 'S'.

Point stands that y'all think he's gonna be some elite coach when all is said and done without ever proving it.

tejas is not as bad as the A&M/Oregon fans counting their chickens when none have ever hatched tho. :dhd:
 
You're right.

Six/Seven both start with an 'S'.

Point stands that y'all think he's gonna be some elite coach when all is said and done without ever proving it.

tejas is not as bad as the A&M/Oregon fans counting their chickens when none have ever hatched tho. :dhd:
Quote the A&M fan and what they are saying that you call counting chickens.
 
Again, you want to rely on the transitive property of CFB - everyone knows that doesn't exist. By your post you believe that Toledo would beat UGA? You know better than that. As I clearly stated, each game stands on its own and can be off for different reasons.

Well I'm not discounting Bama beating Georgia then losing to Vandy and barely beating (3-3) South Carolina 27-25 in Tuscaloosa, if that's what you mean by transitive property.

The South Carolina that needed a TD with 6 minutes remaining to beat (2-4) Old Dominion by 4 pts?
That one? :dhd:

SEC. It just means more.
 
Quote the A&M fan and what they are saying that you call counting chickens.

mmmmm, OK


especially if both teams can keep winning. LSU winning this weekend was a big help. If they can keep from sucking bawls against Arkansas then we would be able to add another top 10 win to the resume and potentially roll into that game as a matchup of two top 10 teams.
 
mmmmm, OK
"If both teams can keep winning"
"would be able to"
"potentially roll into that game"

You need to learn how to comprehend what is being said. In no way am I claiming any of that will happen.
 
"If both teams can keep winning"
"would be able to"
"potentially roll into that game"

You need to learn how to comprehend what is being said. In no way am I claiming any of that will happen.

So 'scenario village' A&M style?
 
So 'scenario village' A&M style?
No. Apparently qualifiers are foreign to you. That's a you problem.

Fun fact, you don't need a scenario village when you hold your own destiny to the playoffs in your hands.
 
Keep in mind that I am not saying those numbers mean we win. I am pointing out that you haven't played very good teams. Maybe that doesn't matter ... we've been accused of playing weak schedules in the past and then kicked the shit out of good teams. I am simply putting it out there that I think you will see more competition on both sides of the ball than you have so far.

Not sure why the DFEI rankings are so different from the ones I used. Candidly, can't tell you where I got mine from.
Could be DFEI is using perf play numbers and adjusting for SOS. Both those defenses (OU and Mich) are fucked, both playing behind wretched offenses. They going to wear down.

I think the easiest way to look at is Georgia and Texas have both played 2 defenses with NFL talent. Georgia has played 1 offense with NFL talent. Texas has played none
 
Back
Top