Vegas giving Tennessee no respect? (+7.5)

That number was pretty drastically skewed by the one run by Orji for 29. Otherwise they averaged 3.4 ypc. The reason we lost was dumbass playcalling doing the only thing that wasn't going to work over and over.
You threw the ball 33 times. Only game you threw the ball more was against Oregon. But keep saying it was the 'play calling'. :facepalm:

Did I mention on those 33 throws -- you only have 175 yards and 2 interceptions?
 
This is @Across The Field's MO. He will cherry pick plays and then say -- we didn't really get pushed around. Ask him about the year Donovan Edwards ran for 200+ yards, but not really, because 75 yard and 85 yard touchdown runs don't count.
This is just dumb though. They brought him in on 3rd and 3. The whole world knew he was running that football. This is not some QB scramble or double reverse that worked.
 
This is just dumb though. They brought him in on 3rd and 3. The whole world knew he was running that football. This is not some QB scramble or double reverse that worked.
It is the same every year since Ohio started losing to Michigan. He called it a fluke when Ohio brought the house every play to stop the run the one year and JJ McCarthy threw for almost 300 yards in the 1st half against them.

As if no team gets burned leaving their secondary on an island, especially when Ohio's secondary was their biggest weakness.

It is a no win. @Across The Field will have an excuse for why everything happens, then says he doesn't make excuses. He refuses to accept that Michigan has been more physical every single year, winning the LOS on both sides and thus controlling the game.
 
They won the LOS. That is generally what those comments refer to, so I am trying to figure out your point.

The point is, OSU played other "physical" teams and did just fine. If OSU would have lost to PSU and IU this physicality point would be more valid.
 
Eric has a hard on for me. I think I may have hurt his feelings about ND before, so he spends his time trying to come up with these "got ya" comments.

It's not to hard to come up with them given how often your wrong (about your own team no less) and your general lack of football knowledge. If I respond back to you, it's generally because of a glaring fuck up on your part.
 
It's not to hard to come up with them given how often your wrong (about your own team no less) and your general lack of football knowledge. If I respond back to you, it's generally because of a glaring fuck up on your part.
Yeah - that's it. Just like tagging me after McCord had a bad game -- the same McCord who finished 10th in the Heisman. I missed where Will Howard finished? One carried a team on his back to a 9-3 record. The other took the most talented roster in all of college football and slid in with a 10-2 record.

Reality is -- I have zero to say to you. I think you are still upset because I mentioned in the past ND hasn't won anything in 40 years and nothing will change for them in the current landscape of CFB. Nothing will change this year. Whoever wins the battle of Indiana will lose by multiple scores to the backup QB of Georgia.

Nothing wrong with being a filler team. CFB needs them.
 
Yeah - that's it. Just like tagging me after McCord had a bad game -- the same McCord who finished 10th in the Heisman. I missed where Will Howard finished? One carried a team on his back to a 9-3 record. The other took the most talented roster in all of college football and slid in with a 10-2 record.

Reality is -- I have zero to say to you. I think you are still upset because I mentioned in the past ND hasn't won anything in 40 years and nothing will change for them in the current landscape of CFB. Nothing will change this year. Whoever wins the battle of Indiana will lose by multiple scores to the backup QB of Georgia.

Nothing wrong with being a filler team. CFB needs them.

I most definitely don't care if you talk shit on ND. Please continue to do so. I'm pretty self deprecating and make fun of them all the time when they suck. They may go another 40 years without winning a title, and I won't lose sleep over it.

McCord had a good season. He was still shit on OSU last year. Congrats one the one thing you've gotten correct.

Have fun watching the Music City bowl or whatever second rate bowl game Michigan is in this year. Have you figured out how many games your head coach has coached yet?
 
I most definitely don't care if you talk shit on ND. Please continue to do so. I'm pretty self deprecating and make fun of them all the time when they suck. They may go another 40 years without winning a title, and I won't lose sleep over it.

McCord had a good season. He was still shit on OSU last year. Congrats one the one thing you've gotten correct.

Have fun watching the Music City bowl or whatever second rate bowl game Michigan is in this year. Have you figured out how many games your head coach has coached yet?
Sounds good. I feel better knowing you won't lose any sleep for the next couple decades.

Did you really just try to poke fun at Michigan? We won the national title last year. I understand you don't remember what that is like as a ND fan, but we are good.
 
Sounds good. I feel better knowing you won't lose any sleep for the next couple decades.

Did you really just try to poke fun at Michigan? We won the national title last year. I understand you don't remember what that is like as a ND fan, but we are good.

Yeah, congratulations on that title. I even said so at the time. For this year, you guys sucked. Just pointing that out is all.
 
This is just dumb though. They brought him in on 3rd and 3. The whole world knew he was running that football. This is not some QB scramble or double reverse that worked.
I never said anything to the contrary. I pointed out that your YPC stat was pretty skewed because of one run. It was a well executed play by them for sure, but it did skew things quite a bit. We largely shut down their RBs and Orji got one long run in. Just that simple.
 
You threw the ball 33 times. Only game you threw the ball more was against Oregon. But keep saying it was the 'play calling'. :facepalm:

Did I mention on those 33 throws -- you only have 175 yards and 2 interceptions?
Howard started the game 6/8 for 61 yards before getting his bell rung, he definitely didn't look the same after that. Either way, though, look at our two scoring drives - 4 run plays in total while Howard moved them down the field through the air. This should have been the pace all day, but they decided we need to run up the gut nearly two dozen times breaking up any rhythm the offense had. Then of course, our kicker is perhaps the worst in CFB.

We lost because they decided they wanted to waste 1/3 of our plays doing the one thing that we knew wouldn't work, which was running up the gut. Taking those runs to the outside where we had success would have made sense. Attacking your DBs deep with JJ Smith like we did only two times resulting in two PI calls would have made sense. Instead they did that. It's odd I'm having to explain this to you yet again, but you do know everyone in the world knows this but you, right?
 
Howard started the game 6/8 for 61 yards before getting his bell rung, he definitely didn't look the same after that. Either way, though, look at our two scoring drives - 4 run plays in total while Howard moved them down the field through the air. This should have been the pace all day, but they decided we need to run up the gut nearly two dozen times breaking up any rhythm the offense had. Then of course, our kicker is perhaps the worst in CFB.

We lost because they decided they wanted to waste 1/3 of our plays doing the one thing that we knew wouldn't work, which was running up the gut. Taking those runs to the outside where we had success would have made sense. Attacking your DBs deep with JJ Smith like we did only two times resulting in two PI calls would have made sense. Instead they did that. It's odd I'm having to explain this to you yet again, but you do know everyone in the world knows this but you, right?
It is so entertaining watching you come up with new excuses after each loss.

Want to know why you lost? Michigan controlled the LOS of both sides of the ball. You couldn't run the ball on our base defense. You couldn't run the ball on our nickel package. Why? Because Michigan controlled the LOS.

Remember how Michigan controlled the LOS. When you can do that -- it allows your safeties to play over the top on your outside WR's. That is why you didn't see a bunch of deep balls. Those guys were doubled almost all day long. A QB with an accurate, big arm can fit throws into tight windows on that defense, but guess who doesn't have that?
 
@ericd7633 and @Across The Field are on the same side

Surprised Meme GIF
 
It is so entertaining watching you come up with new excuses after each loss.

Want to know why you lost? Michigan controlled the LOS of both sides of the ball. You couldn't run the ball on our base defense. You couldn't run the ball on our nickel package. Why? Because Michigan controlled the LOS.

Remember how Michigan controlled the LOS. When you can do that -- it allows your safeties to play over the top on your outside WR's. That is why you didn't see a bunch of deep balls. Those guys were doubled almost all day long. A QB with an accurate, big arm can fit throws into tight windows on that defense, but guess who doesn't have that?
Your DTs ate us up when we ran up the gut, that's obvious. That's the point. When you lose the best center in the nation along with a first round LT which causes you to move the other lineman around to other spots, logic would say don't waste 1/3 of your plays on runs straight up the gut against two first round DTs. We didn't do that against other more physical teams like Iowa, Penn State, or Indiana but we did it against michigan. Again, this is my entire point. When we let Howard lead the offense with the run game being more of a supplement, we moved the ball well. When we let the run game lead (particularly up the gut on first down, which we did a maddening number of times), we lost any sort of rhythm and were basically starting each set of downs on second and long.

It was an absolute dogshit scheme we didn't do in any other game this year. Like I said, everyone seems to know this but you.
 
Michigan had multiple turnovers in the red zone, including one where the guy was wide open by 10 yards in the end zone and Warren made one of the worst throws Ive ever seen. I'm convinced my 10 year old could have made that TD throw.

Realistically. Michigan shouldn't have been able to move the ball at all -- if Ohio's defense is supposed to be one of the best in the nation. We DEFINITELY shouldn't have been able to run for 170+ yards, when that was our only option.

I do agree -- Martindale grossly out schemed Chip and Day. He goaded them into running on multiple downs based on pre-snap looks only to change the look after the snap.
13 pts. The D did well.

Martindale won that game and made Day and Kelly look like amateurs.
 
Well kiss my scraggly old ass. I just realized I'm going to have to make a choice Friday night and Saturday. While I'm a CFB fan, I'm more of a Texas High School fan. I'm going to only check in on the four first round games. I'll be watching the Texas High School finals...5A Division 2 Friday night, 5A Division 1 Sat morning and the two 6A Division games Saturday afternoon/evening.

Guess I shouldn't complain. Fortunate to live in a state where 12 state championship games are televised over a four day period. And a bonus....not near as many TV timeouts! I'll probably get to watch the last half of all college games as many commercials as those have.
 
13 pts. The D did well.

Martindale won that game and made Day and Kelly look like amateurs.
Lets also not forget that on that 27 yard run by Mullings in the 4th, they got away with not one but two blatant holds on JTT and Sawyer that would have turned that into a 3rd and 16 at their own 46 instead of 1st down at our 17. Then again, we literally didn't get a single holding call on opposing OLs in conference play all year so no surprise.

1734622806224.png
1734622881267.png
 
Back
Top