Why The SEC Sucks

Fog said:
The reason the SEC sucks is because of Vanderbilt....

When was the last time they had a winning season and won a conference title?

Needless to say when was the last time a team other than Bama, Georgia, Tenn, Auburn, LSU and Florida won the SEC?

Look there are 14 teams in the SEC and six teams have won conference titles in the past 60 years....

Then another reason the SEC sucks is because there are too many weak teams so only a few of team will win conference titles.

What other major conference has less than 50% of their teams not winning a conference title in the past 60 years?
Click to expand...
ADAA2D6C-713C-4165-B8BE-E455B274CEF4.jpeg
 
I totally agree with this thread, Vanderbilt sucks.
 
trojanfan12 said:
@HammerDown

You gonna tolerate this blatant Vandy slamming?
Click to expand...

Tracy Morgan No GIF
 
wait..y'all telling me I have to check my reef flip flops at the door and jump into crocs when my horns begin SEC play?!?!?
 
6 different SEC teams have won a natty since the start of the BCS era. ACC is next with 3, but Miami was still in the Big East when they won their last natty.
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
6 different SEC teams have won a natty since the start of the BCS era. ACC is next with 3, but Miami was still in the Big East when they won their last natty.
Click to expand...
yeah but nobody remembers those teams.. what we all do remember, is the Wisconsin Badgers..
 
Fog said:
What other major conference has less than 50% of their teams not winning a conference title in the past 60 years?
Click to expand...

PAC10 ....they all suck
 
Know whats cool, soon VY, Ricky Williams, AP, Baker, Kyler Murray will all be part of the SEC legends crowd... See em all on YOUR SEC network! :ranger:
 
Last edited:
Illustrious Potentate said:
6 different SEC teams have won a natty since the start of the BCS era. ACC is next with 3, but Miami was still in the Big East when they won their last natty.
Click to expand...
"but... but... but... Vandy sux!" - fan of school who's never won a College World Series and has a fine Poultry Sciences class for illiterate football players
 
HammerDown said:
"but... but... but... Vandy sux!" - fan of school who's never won a College World Series and has a fine Poultry Sciences class for illiterate football players
Click to expand...
Vandy, should move to the PAC12....I'm sure they would win Conference titles after Conference titles with their football program....

If the SEC is that good their bottom teams should do very well in other conferences....Just saying...:beer2:
 
Fog said:
Vandy, should move to the PAC12....I'm sure they would win Conference titles after Conference titles with their football program....

If the SEC is that good their bottom teams should do very well in other conferences....Just saying...:beer2:
Click to expand...
If “even play” makes for the best conference, then which is the best? We talkin MAC? CUSA?
 
Gatorchip said:
If “even play” makes for the best conference, then which is the best? We talkin MAC? CUSA?
Click to expand...
Great question...

A conference that doesn't have a dominate team year in and year out and any team can win their respective conference year in and year out.

However that conference is going to have teams whose records aren't going to get them ranked high enough to find their way to the BCS,

With the SEC it seems that they get stacked with talent because the other teams have weak programs.

If the weaker teams got blue chippers and diluted the talent pool the Bamas and Tigers requite year in and year out, then we would see the Vandy's of the world having a better chance at winning a conference title.

With that being said...SEC doesn't want to replace the losers with other stronger programs in fear their beloved Bama and Tigers from their winning ways.
 
Last edited:
Fog said:
Great question...

A conference that doesn't have a dominate team year in and year out and any team can win their respective conference year in and year out.

However that conference is going to have teams whose records aren't going to get them ranked high enough to find their way to the BCS,

With the SEC it seems that they get stacked with talent because the other teams have weak programs.

If the weaker teams got blue chippers and diluted the talent pool the Bamas and Tigers requite year in and year out, then we would see the Vandy's of the world having a better chance at winning a conference title.

With that being said...SEC doesn't want to replace the losers with other stronger programs in fear their beloved Bama and Tigers from their winning ways.
Click to expand...
All you said here is that the best conferences don’t produce playoff teams. Which conference is the best? If you can’t narrow it down, just give us your top 3.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top