PAC got hot at the right time. But you can’t just throw out the regular season. Big Ten was a grind week after week. Then throw in Covid on top of that
March Madnes 2021 NCAA Tournament
- Thread starter gobigred
- Start date
PAC got hot at the right time. But you can’t just throw out the regular season. Big Ten was a grind week after week. Then throw in Covid on top of that
This was a year dominated by two teams. Illinois gave Baylor a decent game until mid-2nd half and then Baylor pulled away earlier in the regular season.
#3-#30 was a crap shoot week in/week out and a revolving door. Just look at what UCLA did as an example.
#3-#30 was a crap shoot week in/week out and a revolving door. Just look at what UCLA did as an example.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 4,718
- Reaction score
- 3,181
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
No, they were actually better. Lol.
oh boy
Yes cuz they blew out Gonzaga from start to finish huh. Goodness you stat geeks have no shame. Wth is wrong with you son? Did you see that game last night?
it’s the internet stat squad coming in hot!!
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 760
- Reaction score
- 1,948
- Bookie:
- $ 25,000.00
Nailed it
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2020
- Posts
- 589
- Reaction score
- 1,429
- Bookie:
- $ 387,000.00
The PAC was primed in 2019/2020 go, so let's not forget that.
Last edited:
Gee Wally KU was better than Baylor this year on defense huh?? Lolol
yes Beaver... but they gave up 102 points to the Zags
USC gave up 85. Got beat by 20
FFSA
yes Beaver... but they gave up 102 points to the Zags
USC gave up 85. Got beat by 20
FFSA
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2020
- Posts
- 589
- Reaction score
- 1,429
- Bookie:
- $ 387,000.00
USC, consider the source, was way better than the game they played.
They were severely out coached in their Gonzaga matchup.
Likely one of the best PAC's best defenses in the Conference in 2020/2021.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 4,718
- Reaction score
- 3,181
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
oh boy
Yes cuz they blew out Gonzaga from start to finish huh. Goodness you stat geeks have no shame. Wth is wrong with you son? Did you see that game last night?
Wow. How much of a dumbass am I not to base everything off of one game? That's definitely the way to assess teams. Lol.
Baylor was very good last last night. With that said Gonzaga still shot over 50% from the field, and missed alot of wide open 3's.
Sounds like the Illinois Loyola game. I hear you man Pac-12 did really good in the tournament. But there was only one team all year that was going to bear Gonzaga and they just whipped their ass.
that’s what great perimeter defense does
Hell Vita I’m surprised you’re alive after the UCLA Michigan State game haha. I was pulling for the Bruins that was a helluva last game for them
Because you’re a waterboy. H2H against the same opponent and look what happened. It’s not rocket science
There was no team better than Baylor on defense all year. I don’t care what your stat book tells you lol
“Let’s throw out the H2H against the same opponent and look at the overall body of work”
—the equipment manager
—the equipment manager
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2020
- Posts
- 589
- Reaction score
- 1,429
- Bookie:
- $ 387,000.00
Ya gotta wonder if the UCLA's game plan blueprint helped the Bears out.
Just speculating here, but I'd guess if the Zags blew the doors off of the Bruins, like they did with every other team in the tourney prior, Baylor has a totally different concept of what they needed to do, and the game is a much different contest all together from what we all saw.
In other words, You're Welcome Waco!
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 4,718
- Reaction score
- 3,181
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00
Because you’re a waterboy. H2H against the same opponent and look what happened. It’s not rocket science
There was no team better than Baylor on defense all year. I don’t care what your stat book tells you lol
Lmao. I'll be waiting to hear about your illustrious playing career that you had.
Baylor was a very good defensive team all season. And they were great last night. But basing something on one(or in this case two data points) is objectively a dumb thing to do. I mean I remember watching Baylor give up 83 to Oklahoma State in the Big 12 tournament. Which was like 3 and a half weeks ago.
This just in...
Baylor 86
Gonzaga 70 (20+ under their average)
Baylor was just Baylor. As soon as you get it past half court, they are in your shorts. And they can hit shots
Baylor 86
Gonzaga 70 (20+ under their average)
Baylor was just Baylor. As soon as you get it past half court, they are in your shorts. And they can hit shots
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Posts
- 2,044
- Reaction score
- 910
- Bookie:
- $ 4,500.00
Meh.
That was such an ass whoopin they could have won that game with no gamplan.
The biggest thing is Gonzaga got murdered on the boards.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2020
- Posts
- 589
- Reaction score
- 1,429
- Bookie:
- $ 387,000.00
Really, with no game plan, and you want us all to take you seriously?
Anyone can cherry pick stats, they are all after the fact.
The Zags were out scored by the difference, save a point on 3's alone, so if they hang with Baylor on 3's it's a different game?
No, it's about executing a plan to get the stats to work in your favor, and game plans and execution of those game plans win you the stats.
That's how it has always worked @jontaejones, we use game states to plan the sets, not to grant the winner.
That just tells the story of the game plan;
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 13,506
- Reaction score
- 8,575
- Bookie:
- $ 1,422.00
Illinois isn't even the best team in their own state.
Loyola had the better coach no doubt. All we had to do is throw a different look aka Zone at Loyola. Beavers did that and the Ramblers couldn’t go back door. Those pesky Ramblers