If you were on the playoff committee, what four teams would you vote for?

Voltaire said:
Correct ... that game was a lot closer than many will admit. The final score produces a false narrative,
Click to expand...
So? USC/Utah was a 3 point game in the fourth quarter and then they got trucked. Both USC and Ohio State are who we thought they were and neither deserve to be in the CFP.
 
fishinabarrel said:
It won't matter nearly as much in a couple years when the 12 team officially takes off. You will still have debate on the At large teams and maybe some seeding but it shouldn't be as big of a deal. Everyone that has even the slightest chance of winning it all, should be included in 12 teams
Click to expand...

Looking forward to it.
 
williewilliejuan said:
So? USC/Utah was a 3 point game in the fourth quarter and then they got trucked. Both USC and Ohio State are who we thought they were and neither deserve to be in the CFP.
Click to expand...
Support whomever you wish. I think ohio state deserves a spot, but I would rather see USC.
 
1) Georgia (13-0)
2) Michigan (13-0)

TCU (12-1)
Ohio St (11-1)
Alabama (10-2)

giphy.webp
 
RobBase (c) said:
This is my biggest gripe w the whole thing. Every year we get that “…but are they one of the four best teams in college football?” argument. This is why W’s and L’s should matter, why conference titles should matter and the results of the games should matter not who people “think” are the best 4 teams. Doesn’t matter what people think.

It’s a broken system.
Click to expand...

I'd have preferred an 8 team system with 5 conf Champs, one mid major provided they are ranked top 15 and 2 at large. But 12 is better than 4.

This year would be

Georgia
Michigan
Utah
KSU
Clemson

And the discussion would center around whether Tulane is top 8 worthy (don't think they'd quite make it) and OSU/TCU/Bama....maybe USC or Bama on the fringe.

I think you'd see all 3 of the latter get in given you didn't have a Cincy level team coming from the mid majors.
 
stakesarehigh said:
I'd have preferred an 8 team system with 5 conf Champs, one mid major provided they are ranked top 15 and 2 at large. But 12 is better than 4.

This year would be

Georgia
Michigan
Utah
KSU
Clemson

And the discussion would center around whether Tulane is top 8 worthy (don't think they'd quite make it) and OSU/TCU/Bama....maybe USC or Bama on the fringe.

I think you'd see all 3 of the latter get in given you didn't have a Cincy level team coming from the mid majors.
Click to expand...
Tulane would curbstomp last years cincy team....
 
lmao, you just know the committee wants to put in Alabama/USC/Tennessee in there over TCU

this is gonna be epic
 
tabascojet said:
And yet you still think losing makes them better... you'd pimp out Oberlin over tulane too I'm sure
Click to expand...

I think it was pretty clear I was comparing 2021 Cincy to 2022 Tulane.

Was that somehow unclear?

The Cincy team with Ridder is much better than 2022 Cincy. Hell they had a top 5 pick at corner that may be Rookie DPOY
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top