- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,621
- Reaction score
- 6,970
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00




You never answered the key question .. why would the SEC and the B1G do this? They are already on a path to make $110+ million a year per school. The SEC has a nice 16 team setup, with a 9 game IC, 3-6-6 scheduling and they will put 3-5 teams into the CFP every year.I think they could get 7 but 8 seems way too big and the logic is this:
To The SEC:
- FSU
- Clemson
- UNC
- UVA or VT
(My logic is this I think the 1st three the SEC will want and they will want the league balanced so Virginia is a massive state and solidifies the South for the SEC)
To The B1G:
- UVA or VT
- Duke
- Miami / Boston College
- Defacto get Notre Dame because they have nowhere to go
(My logic on this is that all the schools listed are AAU and most get massive research grants which a big deal to the B1G presidents. Financially Miam is the only one that has a shot at getting the eyeballs so that is conceded).
Problems:
- It would most likely take 8 to break the GOR so those 7 schools would probably have to buy off someone to make it happen but if they all chipped in 50mm for a total of 350mm they could probably talk a Wake Forest into taking the dough.
- Not all the schools would be worth it to the networks but I think both conferences could push the expansion through based on their pull and a crap ton of quality inventory is about to die so content will be at a premium (we are assuming at this point the PAC and ACC are dead leaving only two major players on the board).
- Both conferences would probably be too large at that point to be honest but I think the control aspect of all college sports would be too hard to pass up.
- If the B1G takes both Washington and Oregon fit makes this almost impossible to pull off and the odds aren't great anyway
It may be 2036 before anything happens and by then Clemson and FSU might have been so starved of cash/NIL that their value is gone. It's probably an overstatement but it feels like both those schools might be fighting a losing battle for survival because a 30 to 50 million dollar deficit might be too much.
What reason, other than money, would they have for doing this. To be more specific, why would the following teams vote for adding at least two more teams that are better than them: USCjr, OM, MSU, Vandy, UK, Arky, Mizzou, and Arkansas. That's 8, enough to prevent a majority. And, I think teams like UF and UTjr might vote against it as well. The 4 teams you mention would be a net loss in revenue for teams. Do you really think they will be willing to take a haircut for LESS money?
This is the problem with expansion for expansion sake people, they don't stop and ask the most simple question ... what is in it for my school? UT and OU were no brainers ... they came to the SEC and allowed them to go to 16 which is a number that makes a ton of sense. They are true CFB blue bloods. But all this other stuff just makes no sense. Why would Ole Miss say, "hell yeah, let's bring in two more teams we have to compete against that are more likely to win the SEC than us, and more likely to get into the CFP than us?"
I get why the ACC teams want to leave, but I've yet to see a single realistic explanation as to why anyone things the SEC wants this. And, by the SEC I especially mean the lower half teams. Hell, the SEC has had to pull teeth to get them to go to a 9 game IC schedule. I can't imagine they would get a welcome reception if they went to those teams and said, hey, let's put 2 more teams in the SEC that are like to beat you and keep from winning championships, because ....