More Michigan Cheating

Does anyone actually like Desmond?



The arrogance is laughable. Let's start with Michigan hasn't done shit on a Bama level in decades. So when you say Vandy and Kentucky you imply that other schools haven't carried the BIG much moreso than Michigan has. They weren't shit for 20 plus years before this and they won't be shit after this year.

At a certain point a spade is a spade.

This gem is indicative of Michigan's "success" and they haven't won one since this article either

 
Last edited:
A former judge:

Having been a judge, I just read the sportsmanship rule and then 10-page Michigan letter, and it was clear they were toast. The letter talked about everything but relevant issues and misconstrued the rule, which is a tell.

But, but, but ... the big, bad scary law firm ...

Their only defense was to imply others are doing it.

which isn't a defense lol

Don't have to be a lawyer to know that one
 
Between basketball and football, the head coaches have been suspended for a total of 11 games in the last 20 months. 'Michigan Man' means a little different these days.
 
LOL

"This case" is about sports. This is a Sports Message Board.
"This case" is about college football. This is a College Football Forum on a Sports Message Board.

I live rent free in your head.
I think what you mean to say is -- Michigan lives rent free in your head.
 
Rosenberg is a known scUM junkie so not surprised this is his opinion.
How in the world do Ohio State fans know all these journalists? Any time an article comes out that doesn't say, burn Michigan at the cross, an OSU fan post, that guy is a know UM junkie.

Reality is -- you will have journalists who will write to burn Michigan at the cross and you will have journalists who will write Michigan is getting screwed. It is being done to appease both sides of the fight. It covers all the bases and draws the most interest to the topic.

I bet you will find an SI article that says UM should be punished. Reality is -- no one knows the facts of this case, so they can piece together a story backing any side of the argument.
 
How in the world do Ohio State fans know all these journalists? Any time an article comes out that doesn't say, burn Michigan at the cross, an OSU fan post, that guy is a know UM junkie.

Reality is -- you will have journalists who will write to burn Michigan at the cross and you will have journalists who will write Michigan is getting screwed. It is being done to appease both sides of the fight. It covers all the bases and draws the most interest to the topic.

I bet you will find an SI article that says UM should be punished. Reality is -- no one knows the facts of this case, so they can piece together a story backing any side of the argument.

He was a columnist for the Detroit Free Press and was almost always biased for UM then
 
He was a columnist for the Detroit Free Press and was almost always biased for UM then
I don't get how people know who any of these guys are. And journalists are told to write on one side or the other. Only guy at the freep or Detroit news writing whatever they want is Mitch Albom
 
I don't get how people know who any of these guys are. And journalists are told to write on one side or the other. Only guy at the freep or Detroit news writing whatever they want is Mitch Albom

Been following Buckeyes for as long as I can remember. The dumb ones stick with you. I kid I kid. I could name the ones that will never write a bad thing about Ohio State too if you'd like
 
This is clear cut case of LOIC

I'm not sure why so many are acting like it doesn't exist but it most Certainly does. No reasonable person is going to be given clear evidence a staffer can predict an upcoming play with such precision and not wonder how
Here is my question. One -- what evidence of 'such precision'? Two -- what is the excuse if UM PSU without a HC and without Stalions? Three -- what is the excuse when UM does the same thing to OSU they have done the last two years with Harbaugh?

I realize OSU fans want to grasp on anything to try and justify losing the last two years. Reality is -- Michigan is simply better in the trenches, especially at OL. Also -- Michigan is better coached and make the necessary adjustments at halftime.

Last two years at the half -- it has been 14-13 and 20-17. In the 2nd half -- Michigan has outscored OSU 56-17 in those games.

Did Michigan only use the 'precise signs' in the 2nd half? OR.......does Michigan have better coaches who make adjustments and an OL who is much better than your defensive front and wears you down?
 
Here is my question. One -- what evidence of 'such precision'? Two -- what is the excuse if UM PSU without a HC and without Stalions? Three -- what is the excuse when UM does the same thing to OSU they have done the last two years with Harbaugh?

I realize OSU fans want to grasp on anything to try and justify losing the last two years. Reality is -- Michigan is simply better in the trenches, especially at OL. Also -- Michigan is better coached and make the necessary adjustments at halftime.

Last two years at the half -- it has been 14-13 and 20-17. In the 2nd half -- Michigan has outscored OSU 56-17 in those games.

Did Michigan only use the 'precise signs' in the 2nd half? OR.......does Michigan have better coaches who make adjustments and an OL who is much better than your defensive front and wears you down?

As I've said repeatedly OSU was one Harrison injury away from a likely title. Beating Michigan is always a plus but it doesn't permeate my thoughts. The loss to Sparty in 15 and the Clemson 2020 losses hurt a lot more.

My opinion on this has zero to do with the result of the last 2 games
 
Back
Top