- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,437
- Reaction score
- 6,877
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00




One of us has tried dozens of lawsuits, the other hasn't. One of us just quoted from Wiki. Stay in your lane on this.You don't seem to.
Break it down. Here's the definition of circumstantial evidence, which you claim this is.
What about an analyst being hired to steal signs being on the field helping coaches steals signs, leads you to reasonably infer that the other coaches knew he stole them through in person scouting?
You can't reasonably infer that. This is not evidence of that. You are wrong.
The trier of fact would be allowed to make a reasonable inference that Stalions standing right next to the OC, DC, and HC and relaying detailed signal information means that they had knowledge, or reasonably should have had knowledge, that he was providing information that could only have been obtained in violation of the rules.
Again, stay in your lane on this. You were 100% wrong on our discussion about law firms last week, you are wrong about this.