Yeah, I agree with that. Which is one good consequence of realignment. Conference races will be broader the further into the season than is often the case. I think three of the four additions in the B1G can go toe to toe with the top of their new conference. (UCLA may in a few years.) And Texas and OU can compete with the top of the SEC as evidenced by the Big 12 champ beating the SEC champ last year. The B1G and SEC champs may very well have more than 0-1 losses than normal...depending on how difficult the conference schedules are. (We know those aren't always balanced.)
I just don't see the depth of cannibalism in the other conferences that I do in the Big 12. The other conferences have an established hierarchy that make it much more difficult for the lower level schools to "eat" with the big dogs of the conference. Example: I saw the projections for the Big 12 yesterday. Cincy, Houston and Az State were picked at the bottom. But I think there is a better chance of them beating Utah, K-State and Oklahoma State (who are picked 1, 2, 3) than there is the team picked at the bottom of the B1G defeating Ohio State or Michigan. JMO