More Michigan Cheating

Can't wait to watch the Reigning and Defending National Champion, as well as Back to Back to Back B1G East Champ and Back to Back to Back B1G Conference Champ play in 5 days.

That is a mouthful. I'm hoping the "best team money can buy" gives us a game this year. It is going to sound pretentious to have to say Back to Back to Back to Back if we win the conference again this year. :beer2:
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
Can't wait to watch the Reigning and Defending National Champion, as well as Back to Back to Back B1G East Champ and Back to Back to Back B1G Conference Champ play in 5 days.

That is a mouthful. I'm hoping the "best team money can buy" gives us a game this year. It is going to sound pretentious to have to say Back to Back to Back to Back if we win the conference again this year. :beer2:
Click to expand...
Imagine what it will be like after 4? How many "back to backs" can you add in a sentence?
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Where do you think opposing teams are that hand off sign information to future opponents? How do you not understand that is literally the same thing? If Georgia Tech passes along all of FSU's signs to Clemson....that's literally the same thing. You have a coach of a major program telling you that this is commonplace in the game. What Michigan was doing was functionally no different in terms of the end result. Again, you're trying to make a distinction without a difference because ThOSe ArE THe RuLEs!
Click to expand...
You aren’t being serious are you? CMU didn’t pass off MSUs signs to Michigan. A Michigan staffer quite LITERALLY stood on the CMU sidelines video taping with those glasses, signs. It is not even close to the same thing and you know it. This is not common place in the game. You are lying because you are an insufferable homer. This is not even close to a distinction without difference, it’s just a difference and again you refuse to believe it because you are a dumbass homer.
 
ralphiewvu said:
You aren’t being serious are you? CMU didn’t pass off MSUs signs to Michigan. A Michigan staffer quite LITERALLY stood on the CMU sidelines video taping with those glasses signs. It is not even close to the same thing and you know. This is not common place in the game. You are lying because you are an insufferable homer. This is not even close to a distinction without difference, it’s just a difference and again you refuse to believe it because you are a dumbass homer.
Click to expand...
Go watch the video dummy, it's clear you didn't. That's literally what he says is happening in college football. I have no idea if CMU is passing signs to michigan, but given their head coach is a former Michigan coach -- I wouldn't be shocked if he did as well. Just as I wouldn't be shocked if all the earlier teams weren't feeding information about Michigan elsewhere.

This is commonplace, we have a coach publically addressing it. Sorry, you're wrong.

There is no difference between teams passing off your information to future opponents and stallions sitting on the sidelines; in fact, teams doing it that have already scouted probably offers a ton more information.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Go watch the video dummy, it's clear you didn't. That's literally what he says is happening in college football. I have no idea if CMU is passing signs to michigan, but given their head coach is a former Michigan coach -- I wouldn't be shocked if he did as well. Just as I wouldn't be shocked if all the earlier teams weren't feeding information about Michigan elsewhere.

This is commonplace, we have a coach publically addressing it. Sorry, you're wrong.

There is no difference between teams passing off your information to future opponents and stallions sitting on the sidelines; in fact, teams doing it that have already scouted probably offers a ton more information.
Click to expand...
Yes, iTs hApPeNiNg In cOlLeGe fOoTbAlL but only Michigan has got caught on another teams sideline doing it. Are you even listening to yourself?

Theres no difference between passing info and getting it yourself? You are so blinded by homerism and this ego you will never admit you are wrong. It’s pathetic but not shocking for someone like you.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Texas has nothing to do with the B10 standings. Michigan should have one of the best defenses in the nation.
Click to expand...
Sure, but there isn’t much to suggest Oregon and Ohio State aren’t as good if not better than Texas.

EZ money
 
ralphiewvu said:
Yes, iTs hApPeNiNg In cOlLeGe fOoTbAlL but only Michigan has got caught on another teams sideline doing it. Are you even listening to yourself?

Theres no difference between passing info and getting it yourself? You are so blinded by homerism and this ego you will never admit you are wrong. It’s pathetic but not shocking for someone like you.
Click to expand...
Are you listening to yourself?

Explain the difference between a team passing along your scouted sign information to a future opponent and Stallions sitting on the sideline to gather the same information?
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Are you listening to yourself?

Explain the difference between a team passing along your scouted sign information to a future opponent and Stallions sitting on the sideline to gather the same information?
Click to expand...
You think there is no difference between CMU giving Michigan sign info and Michigan getting it themselves on CMUs sideline in a game not involving Michigan?

You aren’t as serious person maize, just an egotistical homer.
 
ralphiewvu said:
You think there is no difference between CMU giving Michigan sign info and Michigan getting it themselves on CMUs sideline in a game not involving Michigan?

You aren’t as serious person maize, just an egotistical homer.
Click to expand...
You think there's a difference? Lol

Again, you're making a distinction without a difference. You're not a serious person. Both of those things are in-person scouting. One just involves another team doing it for you and passing you that information -- which I'd argue is actually worse because a team who's done a full scouting report on you PLUS played you and seen your signs, will have far more information than stallions with spy glasses.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
You think there's a difference? Lol

Again, you're making a distinction without a difference. You're not a serious person. Both of those things are in-person scouting. One just involves another team doing it for you and passing you that information -- which I'd argue is actually worse because a team who's done a full scouting report on you PLUS played you and seen your signs, will have far more information than stallions with spy glasses.
Click to expand...

There's a world of difference Maize. Hes taping sideline signals from the opposing sideline. While his employer is not part of the said game he's taping the signals at. I'd think that's pretty illegal. And you think that's no different than CMU calling up Michigan and saying this sign means this???

There is no distinction without difference because there's a LARGE difference maize. But again you won't admit that because of your ego and homers. Sad
 
ralphiewvu said:
You think there is no difference between CMU giving Michigan sign info and Michigan getting it themselves on CMUs sideline in a game not involving Michigan?

You aren’t as serious person maize, just an egotistical homer.
Click to expand...
When did they find out that Michigan was doing this?
 
Voltaire said:
When did they find out that Michigan was doing this?
Click to expand...

Well there is video. But if you want to keep up the charade Michigan didn't know it's actually better then ThErE iS No dIfFeReNcE
 
Voltaire said:
When did they find out that Michigan was doing this?
Click to expand...

ralphiewvu said:
Well there is video. But if you want to keep up the charade Michigan didn't know it's actually better then ThErE iS No dIfFeReNcE
Click to expand...
I am talk about a date. When did the NCAA (or other teams) find out that Michigan was in-person watching games of future opponents and decoding their signals?
 
ralphiewvu said:
There's a world of difference Maize. Hes taping sideline signals from the opposing sideline. While his employer is not part of the said game he's taping the signals at. I'd think that's pretty illegal. And you think that's no different than CMU calling up Michigan and saying this sign means this???

There is no distinction without difference because there's a LARGE difference maize. But again you won't admit that because of your ego and homers. Sad
Click to expand...
What do you think a homefield school does to their home football games? Do you think they don't tape every second of them? They literally control access to the tape to distribute to other teams for scouting. I mean, jesus christ. So when a prior opponent it feeding other teams your information, that's FAR more substantial than having someone simply in attendance.
 
Voltaire said:
I am talk about a date. When did the NCAA (or other teams) find out that Michigan was in-person watching games of future opponents and decoding their signals?
Click to expand...

I'm sure you can tell me
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
What do you think a homefield school does to their home football games? Do you think they don't tape every second of them? They literally control access to the tape to distribute to other teams for scouting. I mean, jesus christ. So when a prior opponent it feeding other teams your information, that's FAR more substantial than having someone simply in attendance.
Click to expand...

They. Aren't. Taping. From. The. Sideline. Maize.

Which is by far the better view when taping signs.

Understand the difference yet Maize?
 
ralphiewvu said:
They. Aren't. Taping. From. The. Sideline. Maize.

Which is by far the better view when taping signs.

Understand the difference yet Maize?
Click to expand...
Home teams very literally tape every home game for scouting purposes....

Welcome to the point. Do you understand why these are the same yet?

Home teams, having already played said team, have a tremendous amount of scouting information on the teams they've already played to pass to future opponents.
 
Voltaire said:
I am talk about a date. When did the NCAA (or other teams) find out that Michigan was in-person watching games of future opponents and decoding their signals?
Click to expand...

ralphiewvu said:
I'm sure you can tell me
Click to expand...
Actually, I can't. This is an important question, and it appears that y'all who are piling on Michigan are clueless. This thread started on October 19, 2023. It had to be known before that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top