Week 11 Playoff Projections

Vandy is a not good loss no matter how they try to spin it. Vandy still lost to a 2-7 Sun Belt team this year they aren’t dreadful like they’ve been but I wouldn’t call them some proven good team.
Exactly. They are a marginally improved team compared to recent years, but still lost to a really bad Ga State team (oddly enough that was also by far the most points Ga State has scored this year). Their offense is weak (106th in passing, 84th in rushing), the defense is obviously nothing special. Ole Miss losing to Kentucky is bad enough, but still not as bad as Bama losing to Vandy.
 
Exactly. They are a marginally improved team compared to recent years, but still lost to a really bad Ga State team (oddly enough that was also by far the most points Ga State has scored this year). Their offense is weak (106th in passing, 84th in rushing), the defense is obviously nothing special. Ole Miss losing to Kentucky is bad enough, but still not as bad as Bama losing to Vandy.

My work associate who’s a Kentucky alum/SEC honks assures me that Kentucky would be at least a 10 win team if they played in the Big 10 though!
 
My work associate who’s a Kentucky alum/SEC honks assures me that Kentucky would be at least a 10 win team if they played in the Big 10 though!
I'm wondering if he's been hanging out with newphone and mistakenly thinks Ohio is in the Big Ten.
 
I'm wondering if he's been hanging out with newphone and mistakenly thinks Ohio is in the Big Ten.

They try to seriously claim Kentucky as “not that bad of a loss” Kentucky lost by 14 to a shit Auburn team (at home) and by 28 to a equally shit Florida team. Besides somehow beating Ole Miss their best win is literally against Ohio lol.
 
My work associate who’s a Kentucky alum/SEC honks assures me that Kentucky would be at least a 10 win team if they played in the Big 10 though!
Kentucky is not anywhere near as good or talented as Oregon, Ohio State or Penn State IMO. Indiana? Who knows? My guess is that Kentucky would be somewhere between Indiana (who I think looks fabulous but is untested) fighting with Illinois / Iowa, etc. this year. Five and below in the B1G is dreadful THIS year, so if Kentucky played Indiana's schedule - which so far has been against the Lower Depths (Hello, Maxim Gorky!) of the B1G - they might have a better record than they do. They have some losses to average and bad teams, but just getting Georgia and Tennessee off the schedule might have them at 5-4 instead of 3-6 (using the IU schedule only). If they played Oregon, Ohio State or Penn State, they would lose. Probably would lose to Indian too (just using their schedule as an example). Either way, It's Basketball Season in the Commonwealth!
 
Last edited:
I want Heather Dinich to be my wife. Attractive woman that loves the sport.
Win-Win GIF by Your Happy Workplace
You Can Do It Dreaming GIF by Sealed With A GIF

Wait, you are intelligent, but had to attend summer school?
What The Wtf GIF by Justin
He's Bart Simpson
 
There are a lot of crazy scenarios...almost all of them hinge on Georgia beating Tennessee for us, so go dawgs.

Will be an interesting end to the season.
And not just to get into the CCG. Also for home field advantage or just making the the playoff period.

And traditionalist said the 12 team would devalue the regular season.
 
Kentucky is not anywhere near as good or talented as Oregon, Ohio State or Penn State IMO. Indiana? Who knows? My guess is that Kentucky would be somewhere between Indiana (who I think looks fabulous but is untested) fighting with Illinois / Iowa, etc. this year. Five and below in the B1G is dreadful THIS year, so if Kentucky played Indiana's schedule - which so far has been against the Lower Depths (Hello, Maxim Gorky!) of the B1G - they might have a better record than they do. They have some losses to average and bad teams, but just getting Georgia and Tennessee off the schedule might have them at 5-4 instead of 3-6 (using the IU schedule only). If they played Oregon, Ohio State or Penn State, they would lose. Probably would lose to Indian too (just using their schedule as an example). Either way, It's Basketball Season in the Commonwealth!

This year? Kentucky would be at near the bottom of the B1G they lost by 14 to a bad auburn team and got totally blown out by a mediocre at best when healthy Florida team.
 
Kentucky is not anywhere near as good or talented as Oregon, Ohio State or Penn State IMO. Indiana? Who knows? My guess is that Kentucky would be somewhere between Indiana (who I think looks fabulous but is untested) fighting with Illinois / Iowa, etc. this year. Five and below in the B1G is dreadful THIS year, so if Kentucky played Indiana's schedule - which so far has been against the Lower Depths (Hello, Maxim Gorky!) of the B1G - they might have a better record than they do. They have some losses to average and bad teams, but just getting Georgia and Tennessee off the schedule might have them at 5-4 instead of 3-6 (using the IU schedule only). If they played Oregon, Ohio State or Penn State, they would lose. Probably would lose to Indian too (just using their schedule as an example). Either way, It's Basketball Season in the Commonwealth!
While I would put Kentucky somewhere around Northwestern this year, I see what you're saying. Your last line definitely got a chuckle out of me though lol
 
Exactly. They are a marginally improved team compared to recent years, but still lost to a really bad Ga State team (oddly enough that was also by far the most points Ga State has scored this year). Their offense is weak (106th in passing, 84th in rushing), the defense is obviously nothing special. Ole Miss losing to Kentucky is bad enough, but still not as bad as Bama losing to Vandy.
But this is the exact reason the SEC is tougher than the B1G IMO. The B1G hasn't had any mid/lower level teams that have beaten the top dogs. They have top teams and then basically layups for those top teams. If some of those mid/lower teams would man up and upset the biggies sometimes, it would make the conference better and a lot more interesting IMHO. The Rutgers, Marylands, etc need to step up and pull off some win over OSU, Michigan and Penn State. At least this year Oregon and Indiana have joined the party.
 
This year? Kentucky would be at near the bottom of the B1G they lost by 14 to a bad auburn team and got totally blown out by a mediocre at best when healthy Florida team.
Yep, they did. They also played tough games against Georgia and Tennessee and beat Ole Miss. Not trying to pump up Kentucky as much as saying if they played IU's schedule instead of their own, they might be 5-4 instead of 3-6 right now. So, a notch below Illinois (6-3) and Iowa (6-4) would be more appropriate. :)
 
But this is the exact reason the SEC is tougher than the B1G IMO. The B1G hasn't had any mid/lower level teams that have beaten the top dogs. They have top teams and then basically layups for those top teams. If some of those mid/lower teams would man up and upset the biggies sometimes, it would make the conference better and a lot more interesting IMHO. The Rutgers, Marylands, etc need to step up and pull off some win over OSU, Michigan and Penn State. At least this year Oregon and Indiana have joined the party.

That line only works when you don't lose to toledo, GA state, and USC
 
My work associate who’s a Kentucky alum/SEC honks assures me that Kentucky would be at least a 10 win team if they played in the Big 10 though!
Only IF Kentucky had a Rutgers, Indiana or Penn State type schedule. Rutgers avoids, Ohio State, Penn State, Indiana, Oregon AND Michigan....even though Michigan might have been a win for them this year. I'd agree with your work associate if they had that kind of B1G schedule. Probably not if they had to play some of the top four. Indiana and Penn State play Ohio State in conference and that's it other than middling/poor.
 
It's also easier to have fewer losses when you're not losing to Vandy, Kentucky, and USC.
Agree, but I thought that idea that when we went to the 12 team CFP, and the B1G and the SEC grabbed all the good teams, was that we recognized that there are large disparities in win/loss status. I agree that there is no excuse for losing to lousier teams, but the idea has been to look at the "body of work" not just count losses because all W/L records aren't equal. It's really that simple, and yes, you should get docked if you lose to a bad team. But you should also get docked if you don't play any good teams. If that gets ignored, the SEC and the B1G will insist on 4 AQs with the 2 top byes being their CCs, and people will stop scheduling good OOC games. You think that Clemson is going to keep playing UGA if getting that loss every year means another ACC loss and they are out of the CFP?
 
The flip flopping from the SEC honks is hilarious all this talk of SOS and “body of work” but in the same breath “well you can’t judge Texas for that it’s not their fault teams who were supposed to be good turned out to be bad”
Read all my posts. I say exactly that about Texas in every post. Seeing as how I am the SEC voice here, you just aren't paying attention. I am the one saying that if Texas loses to ATM, they should be out of the CFP. Same with IU.
 
The flip flopping from the SEC honks is hilarious all this talk of SOS and “body of work” but in the same breath “well you can’t judge Texas for that it’s not their fault teams who were supposed to be good turned out to be bad”
BTW, you can minimize "body of work" and SOS all you want, but if you want to have more great games, you better want that body of work and SOS gets taken into consideration. Otherwise, the SEC won't go to 9 IC games, and no one will schedule tough OOC.
 
BTW, you can minimize "body of work" and SOS all you want, but if you want to have more great games, you better want that body of work and SOS gets taken into consideration. Otherwise, the SEC won't go to 9 IC games, and no one will schedule tough OOC.

What exactly is Texas body of work? You have yet to explain lol their biggest accomplishment so far is losing to Georgia.
 
Only IF Kentucky had a Rutgers, Indiana or Penn State type schedule. Rutgers avoids, Ohio State, Penn State, Indiana, Oregon AND Michigan....even though Michigan might have been a win for them this year. I'd agree with your work associate if they had that kind of B1G schedule. Probably not if they had to play some of the top four. Indiana and Penn State play Ohio State in conference and that's it other than middling/poor.

Kentucky lost badly to Auburn and Florida. They would struggle to beat anyone. They aren’t 10-0 even with Indianas schedule.
 
Yep, they did. They also played tough games against Georgia and Tennessee and beat Ole Miss. Not trying to pump up Kentucky as much as saying if they played IU's schedule instead of their own, they might be 5-4 instead of 3-6 right now. So, a notch below Illinois (6-3) and Iowa (6-4) would be more appropriate. :)

They would get killed by Iowa or Illinois.

5-4 with Indiana’s schedule is still pretty bad lol.
 
Back
Top