Texas and Oklahoma to the SEC

How long?

  • Year 1

    Votes: 6 26.1%
  • Within the first 3-5 seasons

    Votes: 9 39.1%
  • At LEAST 10 years

    Votes: 6 26.1%
  • Texas BBQ style potato salad

    Votes: 2 8.7%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
Are you going to talk about Tier 1 (ESPN/FOX) or Tier 3 (BigTen Network)? You're jumping from Tier to Tier whenever it suits you. Stick to one and be done with it.
You know exactly what I’m talking about. The market TCU adds would be the second largest market in the PAC. Stop playing dumb.
 
You know exactly what I’m talking about. The market TCU adds would be the second largest market in the PAC. Stop playing dumb.

TCU doesn't bring that market.

If you are talking about Tier 1, ESPN isn't going to be charging more to people in Dallas/Ft Worth if the PAC adds TCU. That isn't how it works. If you are going to claim that indeed this is how it works, you better bring some evidence more than your usual BS you are spewing.


If you are talking about Tier 3, the PAC-12 Network is struggling to even get on providers on the West Coast. They will only have marginal success with teams like TCU, who aren't even the most popular team in their own city.
 
No doubt. It's still the Tier 3, which now @ralphiewvu wants to claim is Tier 1.

All I know about tier 3 is that the donghorns been telling us for 10 years that the Big 12 keeping their tier 3 rights was the best avenue and that it was going to keep the Big 12 successful.
How did that work out for the Big 12?
Do a search on 'tier 3' on either eurohoop or here and you'll see what I'm talking about.
 
TCU doesn't bring that market.

If you are talking about Tier 1, ESPN isn't going to be charging more to people in Dallas/Ft Worth if the PAC adds TCU. That isn't how it works. If you are going to claim that indeed this is how it works, you better bring some evidence more than your usual BS you are spewing.


If you are talking about Tier 3, the PAC-12 Network is struggling to even get on providers on the West Coast. They will only have marginal success with teams like TCU, who aren't even the most popular team in their own city.
Tier 3 Admittedly I got the tiers mixed up.

The provider will absolutely get that mo matter if anyone watches or not. The 5th largest market. Which yo called minuscule, lol
 
All I know about tier 3 is that the donghorns been telling us for 10 years that the Big 12 keeping their tier 3 rights was the best avenue and that it was going to keep the Big 12 successful.
How did that work out for the Big 12?
Do a search on 'tier 3' on either eurohoop or here and you'll see what I'm talking about.

I think we are in agreement that the BigTen Network has been wildly successful for its conference members.

The PAC-12 Network getting an "in" into the Dallas/Ft Worth market by picking up the 2nd/3rd most popular team isn't going to reverse its fortunes.
 
Tier 3 Admittedly I got the tiers mixed up.

The provider will absolutely get that mo matter if anyone watches or not. The 5th largest market. Which yo called minuscule, lol

No shit Sherlock. You're a fucking moron.
 
You just finished rambling for 2 pages that I need to learn how the media rights work, and you don't even fucking know the difference between Tier 1 and Tier 3.

You are a waste of oxygen.
 
I think we are in agreement that the BigTen Network has been wildly successful for its conference members.

The PAC-12 Network getting an "in" into the Dallas/Ft Worth market by picking up the 2nd/3rd most popular team isn't going to reverse its fortunes.

PAC got into a bad deal overall. At least you don't have to wait as long as the ACC does to rectify the situation.
 
PAC got into a bad deal overall. At least you don't have to wait as long as the ACC does to rectify the situation.

A lot of the PAC's misfortunes were due to poor leadership. Hopefully the new commish is able to figure out a way to get the PAC-12 network available to more West Coasters.
 
Hint: TCU is in Dallas/Ft. Worth, but does not deliver the Dallas/Ft. Worth market.
 
You just finished rambling for 2 pages that I need to learn how the media rights work, and you don't even fucking know the difference between Tier 1 and Tier 3.

You are a waste of oxygen.
So you still can’t see how payments would go up for adding the 5th largest television market?

You still aren’t as smart as you think you are.
 
Hint: TCU is in Dallas/Ft. Worth, but does not deliver the Dallas/Ft. Worth market.
Link

And no matter what that link would be lying. It doesn’t matter, the provider will charge everyone in that area whether they watch or not.
 
A lot of the PAC's misfortunes were due to poor leadership. Hopefully the new commish is able to figure out a way to get the PAC-12 network available to more West Coasters.

"West Coasters"?

It's not even on HULU here in Nebraska.

Big 10, SEC, and ACC are all part of the $55/month HULU package. If it were on HULU I'd watch it on occasion.
It doesn't really matter if I watch it or not. If it's available the PAC's getting paid for it.
 
Here ya go dummie

I didn't say Dallas was miniscule, dummy. TCU's perceived market is miniscule. Even in the best of years, they were outnumbered by A&M/Longhorn fans in Dallas.
 
"West Coasters"?

It's not even on HULU here in Nebraska.

Big 10, SEC, and ACC are all part of the $55/month HULU package. If it were on HULU I'd watch it on occasion.
It doesn't really matter if I watch it or not. If it's available the PAC's getting paid for it.

It's not available on some cable companies out west, and is also not carried by DirecTV. It would be wise to fix the distribution issues locally before branching out to national PAC-12 network coverage.
 
Back
Top