tOfficial PAC-12 Thread

WhosYourDawggy said:
Not to quibble, but you said precisely, "8-0 PAC team is in."

That's why I persisted in my follow-up. I think a 1 loss CC from any of the 3 teams playing 10 games and a CC would get in before them. A 9-0 B1G gets in before them, and I think an 8-1 B1G CC gets in before them. By playing less games than everyone, and not having a CC so that the two best teams have to face each other, eliminates them. I honestly think that a 1 loss non-CC from the SEC or the ACC (assuming Clemson or ND) would also get in before them.
Click to expand...
8-0 PAC champ will be in over a 8-1 B1G champ.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
8-0 PAC champ will be in over a 8-1 B1G champ.
Click to expand...
Not a chance, and it would make zero sense. Less games, no CCG win. Plus, it's the PAC which no one has any respect for, even more so for their feckless reaction to this pandemic.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
Not a chance, and it would make zero sense. Less games, no CCG win. Plus, it's the PAC which no one has any respect for, even more so for their feckless reaction to this pandemic.
Click to expand...

You realize the PAC is on the committee, along with the rest of the conferences.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
You realize the PAC is on the committee, along with the rest of the conferences.
Click to expand...
I realize that the PAC is considered the least competitive conference of the P5 conferences. It's why they are most often left out. That's not going to change this year. Other than simply declaring 8-0 PAC team goes, you haven't pointed out any reason why they would go before a champ of another conference, that played more games and won a CCG. Let's hear your rationale, I've given mine.

Also, I can't see them getting started by Halloween. It will take them another week for their decision at least, and they can't be ready in a month. They've not been practicing like the B1G has. If they don't get started by Halloween, they will play 6-7 games, then they won't even be considered.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
I realize that the PAC is considered the least competitive conference of the P5 conferences. It's why they are most often left out. That's not going to change this year. Other than simply declaring 8-0 PAC team goes, you haven't pointed out any reason why they would go before a champ of another conference, that played more games and won a CCG. Let's hear your rationale, I've given mine.

Also, I can't see them getting started by Halloween. It will take them another week for their decision at least, and they can't be ready in a month. They've not been practicing like the B1G has. If they don't get started by Halloween, they will play 6-7 games, then they won't even be considered.
Click to expand...

They are most often left out because no one makes it through unscathed. Oregon would have clearly been in over Oklahoma last year if they had beaten ASU.
 
So Halloween start!?!?!?!???
We doing this!?!?!??

wE DOING THIs!?!?!?!??
 
OregonDucks said:
So Halloween start!?!?!?!???
We doing this!?!?!??

wE DOING THIs!?!?!?!??
Click to expand...
Sounds like November 1st at the earliest. UCLA was named as one of the school who would be vote yes at the moment but they said two other unidentified universities voted no until next week. So for sure Cal was one, but who could the third be? Guessing Oregon or Washington.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
I realize that the PAC is considered the least competitive conference of the P5 conferences. It's why they are most often left out. That's not going to change this year. Other than simply declaring 8-0 PAC team goes, you haven't pointed out any reason why they would go before a champ of another conference, that played more games and won a CCG. Let's hear your rationale, I've given mine.

Also, I can't see them getting started by Halloween. It will take them another week for their decision at least, and they can't be ready in a month. They've not been practicing like the B1G has. If they don't get started by Halloween, they will play 6-7 games, then they won't even be considered.
Click to expand...
who considers it the least competitive? that seems to be more what we hear about the ACC. all they have had for the last few years is Clemson.
the Big XII has Oklahoma and then maybe another team Baylor last year texas in 18 who look good then a bunch of 8 win teams?
 
OlyDuck said:
who considers it the least competitive? that seems to be more what we hear about the ACC. all they have had for the last few years is Clemson.
the Big XII has Oklahoma and then maybe another team Baylor last year texas in 18 who look good then a bunch of 8 win teams?
Click to expand...

You're wasting your time. @WhosYourDawggy has already outed himself as the resident dumbass on the CFB Board... @AlaskaGuy can breathe a sigh of relief...for the moment.
 
So last i read stanford was wiping its pussy all over the discussion floor regarding a return to football, any push to go without them? whats the scoop pac locals?
 
AlaskaGuy said:
www.foxnews.com

University of California wrongly admitted 64 wealthy students, some as student-athletes, state audit finds

A state audit released Tuesday revealed that the University of California wrongly admitted 64 wealthy students over the past six years, some under the premise of being athletes.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
www.mercurynews.com

Audit blasts UC Berkeley, UCLA for admitting rich donor kids over more qualified applicants

Four of the system’s most elite schools admitted 64 applicants — including 42 at UC Berkeley — between the 2013-14 and 2018-19 academic years based on families’ donations, r…
www.mercurynews.com www.mercurynews.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top