CFP Top 25 Part 3 Discussion

I really think they'd put 2 loss Bama in over ND. Would take UGA completely blowing them out to change my opinion on that.

My only line of thinking as to why they wouldn't is because of a rematch scenario.
 
The committee does value conference championships as well.

Not saying that Bama definitely misses with 2 losses, but it will be a tough sell.
 
Ohio State and Penn State beg to differ.

the committee also has said head to head matters except when it doesn’t.

Penn State had 2 losses IIRC.

The year 1-loss tOSU wasn't selected, their competition was 1 other 1-loss champ, and undefeated teams.
 
The committee SAYS it values conference championships.
I don't think Bama should get in with 2 losses ... I'd hate to have to beat them twice, but the conference champions angle is a little trickier. It actually isn't part of the initial evaluation the way the CFP is currently run. The committee is charged with finding the 4 best teams, regardless of the conference champ status. Only once two teams in consideration are deemed to be equal can they take into consideration whether one is a champion or not. That's how tOSU got in over PSU a few years back. The committee found that tOSU was definitely the better team than PSU even though they lost to them because PSU lost to Pitt and got drubbed by Michigan. The fact that PSU was the conf champ wasn't even considered.
 
I don't think Bama should get in with 2 losses ... I'd hate to have to beat them twice, but the conference champions angle is a little trickier. It actually isn't part of the initial evaluation the way the CFP is currently run. The committee is charged with finding the 4 best teams, regardless of the conference champ status. Only once two teams in consideration are deemed to be equal can they take into consideration whether one is a champion or not. That's how tOSU got in over PSU a few years back. The committee found that tOSU was definitely the better team than PSU even though they lost to them because PSU lost to Pitt and got drubbed by Michigan. The fact that PSU was the conf champ wasn't even considered.
That and 2017. Alabama loses to Auburn bt 12 last week of the regular season and misses the CCG. We all know how that worked out.
 
I don't think Bama should get in with 2 losses ... I'd hate to have to beat them twice, but the conference champions angle is a little trickier. It actually isn't part of the initial evaluation the way the CFP is currently run. The committee is charged with finding the 4 best teams, regardless of the conference champ status. Only once two teams in consideration are deemed to be equal can they take into consideration whether one is a champion or not. That's how tOSU got in over PSU a few years back. The committee found that tOSU was definitely the better team than PSU even though they lost to them because PSU lost to Pitt and got drubbed by Michigan. The fact that PSU was the conf champ wasn't even considered.
I’m really surprised the committee didn’t send Ohio State to the playoffs in 2015 since Ohio State was clearly better than Michigan State. The committee has already stated that the eye test is more important than actual results on the field because actual results are biased.
 
That and 2017. Alabama loses to Auburn bt 12 last week of the regular season and misses the CCG. We all know how that worked out.
Unfortunately, we do. That said, I can't see anyone arguing that Bama wasn't the best team that year, fuckers.
 
I’m really surprised the committee didn’t send Ohio State to the playoffs in 2015 since Ohio State was clearly better than Michigan State. The committee has already stated that the eye test is more important than actual results on the field because actual results are biased.
One of the reasons I can't wait for the 12 CFP is to never have to hear them explain to me why UM is ranked higher than MSU when that was decided on the field a few weeks ago. Now, MSU shouldn't have lost to Purdue, and that has to be considered. And both teams have 2 big games left which will decide it. But I can't see having MSU behind UM ... makes little sense to me.
 
To beat you guys in overtime doesn't make them the best team, IMO
Fair enough ... the "best teams" standard sets the field and then it's a tournament after that. Unfortunately, the cousin fucking gumps got us that year. I do believe with our Rose Bowl against OU, and the OT game with Bama that was the best year so far.
 
Fair enough ... the "best teams" standard sets the field and then it's a tournament after that. Unfortunately, the cousin fucking gumps got us that year. I do believe with our Rose Bowl against OU, and the OT game with Bama that was the best year so far.
I might have watched 5 minutes of the games that year.

Imagine a team that loses the game for the division championship, can't play in their conference championship winning the national championship. Hahahaha

Ought to rename it the Eyetest Championship
 
I might have watched 5 minutes of the games that year.

Imagine a team that loses the game for the division championship, can't play in their conference championship winning the national championship. Hahahaha

Ought to rename it the Eyetest Championship
Too bad, you missed some great football for no reason.

No need to imagine it ... it happened. You seem to think everyone else is half cocked. When pretty much the entire sports world disagrees with you, you might want to consider that maybe it isn't the millions of others who are crazy. Just saying.
 
Too bad, you missed some great football for no reason.

No need to imagine it ... it happened. You seem to think everyone else is half cocked. When pretty much the entire sports world disagrees with you, you might want to consider that maybe it isn't the millions of others who are crazy. Just saying.
I don't form my opinions by what other people think. I'm glad you "enjoyed" it.

BTW, when you asked me about the other sports and the way their championships are set up? The one thing they all have is ALL conference champs are invited.
 
Back
Top