Dunce Q: Place ball when out of bounds?

Red_Alert said:
That's because your scenario is so fucking stupid it's confusing.

Nobody reaches the ball fucking backwards. Unless you're a Nebraska coached player.
Click to expand...
No one said backwards. You really are stupid or trolling.

you go out of bounds going forward.
you start from the 50. Going forward. Ball crosses out of bounds at 49 GOING FORWARD.
YOU finally touch out of bounds when the ball is at the 46 out of bounds GOING FORWARD.

IN ANY OF THAT, did you read anything about going backwards or reaching backwards? Fucking dolt
 
season 7 grandpa simpson GIF
 
ELTEXAN said:
No. You’re purposefully being ambiguous to try to troll. Again:

You dive from the 50.
The ball crosses out of bounds at the 49.
Your foot lands out of bounds later when the ball is still out of bounds and now at the 46.
Where to place the ball? 49 or 46? Literally the exact same question as the OP.
Click to expand...
ELTEXAN said:
You said 46 before. So you’re officially trolling and contradicting yourself. Dunce.

also, I didnt say his foot touched at the 46. I said that’s where the ball was when he first touched out of bounds. So you’re trolling or you can’t read. Five pages of you being and idiot AND contradicting yourself
Click to expand...


The fuck you didn't.

How the hell does someone 'diving' 12 feet get their feet back under them to touch first?

Learn to write coherently.
 
Red_Alert said:
The fuck you didn't.

How the hell does someone 'diving' 12 feet get their feet back under them to touch first?

Learn to write coherently.
Click to expand...
Yeah. Keep trolling and reaching. You were wrong. Shown to be wrong. By the rules you yourself copy pasted. And have contradicting answers.
Again, and no one said the foot landed at the 46. You’re just all wet all the way through.

nothing ambiguous here. Just your dumb brain which cannot comprehend a simple ask:
66CF3EEF-A097-4FE4-BD5D-84280A283931.jpeg
 
I might assume that the refs are trained to watch the feet, to determine where the runner went out, and just assume the ball will be there, most of the time. Eyes can't be in 2 places at once.

Might explain some thing.
Might
 
outofyourmind said:
I might assume that the refs are trained to watch the feet, to determine where the runner went out, and just assume the ball will be there, most of the time. Eyes can't be in 2 places at once.

Might explain some thing.
Might
Click to expand...

It's typically reviewed if a first down or TD is in question or the call on the field is egregiously wrong.

It's like putting one second back on the clock in the Big 12 title game for tejas. That's not reviewed for the one second at any other portion of the game. If it were then games would last 5 hours.
 
outofyourmind said:
I might assume that the refs are trained to watch the feet, to determine where the runner went out, and just assume the ball will be there, most of the time. Eyes can't be in 2 places at once.

Might explain some thing.
Might
Click to expand...
Yup. Because I’ve seen it done both ways.
bith ways in consecutive days.
the fun part is, the rules commentators said literal different things in both games.
so it wasn’t just refs being refs; the rules dudes actually said opposite things in each game… and the refs DID give that one guy the conversion last night when he extended the ball out of bounds
 
Red_Alert said:
It's typically reviewed if a first down or TD is in question or the call on the field is egregiously wrong.

It's like putting one second back on the clock in the Big 12 title game for tejas. That's not reviewed for the one second at any other portion of the game. If it were then games would last 5 hours.
Click to expand...
I think that's true.
I was just trying to talk to the original OP really, at mid-field
 
Bayou Tiger said:
I've been through this same exercise with him and actually used the same material for refence and stated the same examples.

He is either trolling, stupid or likes to appear argumentative for the sake of arguin
Click to expand...

funny because he actually gave contradicting answers and settled
On the the wrong one.

Oh and I just re-read your posts; you were also not answering the actual thread point. You were on some tangent about the body being inside the field of play or some dumb shit

Again, what is ambiguous about:
93EB7745-8611-44D1-BB12-B3A519865199.jpeg
 
Red_Alert said:
The fuck you didn't.

How the hell does someone 'diving' 12 feet get their feet back under them to touch first?

Learn to write coherently.
Click to expand...

He's about the dumbest fucking guy you'll meet here...but he will argue that stupidity for months.

He must have lead with his head too many times as a kid during tackle drills.
 
ELTEXAN said:
funny because he actually gave contradicting answers and settled
On the the wrong one.
Click to expand...
Shutup stupid...seriously, just shut the fuck up dummy!
 
ELTEXAN said:
Agai


again: what is ambiguous about this:

View attachment 51605
Click to expand...

Nothing. Show me anywhere where I stated that at any time in any post on this site dummy. You can't because it never happened. Oh it may have appeared to happen to you, with that pea-sized brain of yours, but in reality it only transpired in that head leading tackle injured brain of yours.
 
Bayou Tiger said:
Nothing. Show me anywhere where I stated that at any time in any post on this site dummy. You can't because it never happened. Oh it may have appeared to happen to you, with that pea-sized brain of yours, but in reality it only transpired in that head leading tackle injured brain of yours.
Click to expand...
Then why are you siding with the rantings of the guy who gave LITERAL INCORRECT answers in the first page, then changed answers and contradicted himself, I actually agree with him that his take is how I’ve seen it done sometimes, he again settled in the wrong answer at the same time pasting the rule that literally proves him wrong, and saying that I AM the one being argumentative?
Are you that dumb?

I am not the one being argumentative.
i wrote what you admit is an unambiguous question.
i am the one who agreed with him that it is sometimes ruled his way. He goes off on incorrect tangents and argues against his own copy pastes… yet you say I AM the one being toxic and wrong etc etc.

that’s insane.

Yall keep nodding at your boyfriends for approval

the op was unambiguous, and I’m not the one who was contradicting myself and being argumentative.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top