

But again, they have NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS.Auburn has a great football season randomly every 7 years or so. Otherwise they are mediocre to bad.
I don't think you are grasping it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But again, they have NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS.Auburn has a great football season randomly every 7 years or so. Otherwise they are mediocre to bad.
Oh, if we’re talking about teams that are actually consistently good AND have won championships in the last 20 years… that’s a different story. But what about Oregon?… and app state and Boise state?1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. Georgia
4. Ohio State
5. Oklahoma
6. USC
7. Miami
8. LSU
9. Florida
10. Auburn
I didn't put mine in any order. Just remembered teams that have a NC since 2000.That is a pretty good list but Florida and LSU should be a lot higher. Both have won a lot more Championships than the teams above them. I would list the following:
1. Alabama
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. LSU
5. Florida
6. Oklahoma
7. USC
8. Georgia
9. Auburn
10. Texas
Miami was really only good from 2000-2005. Texas had a good run from 2000-2009.
They’re basically the oregon of the SEC.Auburn has a great football season randomly every 7 years or so. Otherwise they are mediocre to bad.
Oregon 2001 should've gone to the NC.
Oregon would've won the national title in 2007 if Dixon doesn't get hurt.
Oregon goes to NC game in 2010.
Oregon goes to NC in 2014.
4 national title game appearances should be on the Ducks history wall in the span of 21 years.
This is rich. Oregon has been the most consistent winning team in the PAC-12 since 2000.They’re basically the oregon of the SEC.
(except they have won National Championships)They’re basically the oregon of the SEC.
They’re basically the oregon of the SEC.
No, not to that extent. Oregon really should have gone to play Miami in 2001 and I dont think many other than Nebraska fans would argue that. There was actual fact based reasons why Oregon should have gone in 2001. It was also obvious that before his ACL went out, No one was stopping Dixon and Oregon that year.Tennessee should have gone to title in 2001. Tennessee should have beaten Auburn and played USC in 2004, Tennessee should have beaten LSU and won SEC in 2007, Tennessee shouldn't have chocked in 2016 and won SEC East, Tennessee lost 4 games by less than 5 points on last minute plays in 2015 and could have been in playoffs. Tennessee should have won tie breaker in 2003 and played for SEC Championship in Atlanta.
See, anyone could play this game.
Touché(except they have won National Championships)
Hey, Auburn actually has a title! Ironically, it was against Oregon.
Because they’re better than oregon.Then why do you have Oklahoma ranked?
let's not get started on that![]()
Cue “he was down!!!”
Are we counting USC's cheating years or not? Do all those years get *'s?@OregonDucks
Here is the thing, no one is arguing that Oregon is a good program but to say you are ahead of USC is just laughable. I am sorry.
And that’s got you where? Everyone on a college football forum laughing at you for calling them too 10 in the last 22 years…This is rich. Oregon has been the most consistent winning team in the PAC-12 since 2000.
What about Oregon’s cheating years? Why’d Chip leave again?Are we counting USC's cheating years or not? Do all those years get *'s?
Even so, besides that span from 01-08 they have done diddly squat in the conference and on a national level.
I insist.let's not get started on that