



IMO Rankings are meh anyway. Gimme a 3 star with heart and a motor over a talented 5 star with a what can you do for me attitude every day of the weekUnranked on 3 of 4 services and mid-3 star on On3. Odd you only bring that up about Texas DL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMO Rankings are meh anyway. Gimme a 3 star with heart and a motor over a talented 5 star with a what can you do for me attitude every day of the weekUnranked on 3 of 4 services and mid-3 star on On3. Odd you only bring that up about Texas DL
Good luck with that ... I lived that for 15 years under Richt ... it will get you what it got us, no NCs albeit some good football.IMO Rankings are meh anyway. Gimme a 3 star with heart and a motor over a talented 5 star with a what can you do for me attitude every day of the week
I have no idea. I have made my thoughts clear on the bugs. Services are always slow to move them up and generally underrate them compared to a position like WR. I was just laughing about the hypocrisyIMO Rankings are meh anyway. Gimme a 3 star with heart and a motor over a talented 5 star with a what can you do for me attitude every day of the week
That may have been his point. To some people, good football, not natties, is the goal. 65-7 is not good football.Good luck with that ... I lived that for 15 years under Richt ... it will get you what it got us, no NCs albeit some good football.
At the end of the day, stars matter. The more really high end players you get the larger your margin for error when some don't work out. Relying on diamonds in the rough, or being a great developer is not the way to get NCs.
Not sure how you get that as his meaning. Your outlook on CFB is unique and I respect that. But if you aren’t wanting the highest rated players your team can get, you aren’t following how CFB works. The ass end of 65-7 had three stars with heart. As you stated, that’s not good football.That may have been his point. To some people, good football, not natties, is the goal. 65-7 is not good football.
What he was saying, IMO, was he wants players that are competitors, not prima dona 5-stars. Obviously the goal is to get 5 star players that are competitors.Not sure how you get that as his meaning. Your outlook on CFB is unique and I respect that. But if you aren’t wanting the highest rated players your team can get, you aren’t following how CFB works. The ass end of 65-7 had three stars with heart. As you stated, that’s not good football.
Yeah, my response was to get 5* that aren't prima donnas. Candidly, I think the best programs get them, but some come through. Bear Alexander is an example, Cox who left UGA for UF was another. A quick trigger to process them is the way to go.What he was saying, IMO, was he wants players that are competitors, not prima dona 5-stars. Obviously the goal is to get 5 star players that are competitors.
Michigan whiffs on another one as well
Bennett Warren 4* #82 OVR #5 OT who scUM supposedly had been in the lead for forever committed to Tennessee instead this morning
I like to look at star rankings, more as a percentage. We know that each star roughly doubles the odds of being a draft pick. On the aggregate the star rankings are very good. They are not as good on the individual level. Plenty of kids will out-perform or under-perform their rankings. While plenty of 3 stars will play in the NFL, your odds of success are a lot better with a team of 5 stars than 3 stars.What he was saying, IMO, was he wants players that are competitors, not prima dona 5-stars. Obviously the goal is to get 5 star players that are competitors.
Yup OU backing off him since landing Tatum. You didn't tell me that Caden Durham was a bit of head case. But hang on, Big Boom coming soon.REAL HOTTTT
View attachment 104772
he's not a headcase because he decided to go to LSU.. but you gotta admit.. he was a real ou fan... him going to LSU is something elseYup OU backing off him since landing Tatum. You didn't tell me that Caden Durham was a bit of head case. But hang on, Big Boom coming soon.
OU has 2 running backs in the class already and Lsu has none. Makes sense to me.he's not a headcase because he decided to go to LSU.. but you gotta admit.. he was a real ou fan... him going to LSU is something else
i get that but his skillset is much different from tatum and the other guy you haveOU has 2 running backs in the class already and Lsu has none. Makes sense to me.
Welp, we better get Houston now. Another year of supposedly "leading" for these top end DL and whiffing on them. Might be time to start showing Larry Johnson Sr the door.