2024 Recruiting Thread

duckboy33 said:
How are UGA people feeling about Breeland?

I know there's some growing optimism on the Oregon boards that they're going to win their first of what seems like 100 recruiting battles against UGA. However, it seems like Miami and Georgia are still in the picture.
Click to expand...
Less optimistic. Per all the insiders and staff, he's an Oregon lean at this point.
 
Wishbone said:
Sark missed on his top target Stewart the year prior. Got Cook last year, who appeared to be the staffs top target. Missed on Wingo and Hudson in this years class. Dokorian Moore in next years class. Not the best hit rate with his top WR targets fwiw
Click to expand...
What did I miss? Wingo is a miss for UT? I see some Mizzou momentum, but no announcements.
 
Wishbone said:
Sark missed on his top target Stewart the year prior. Got Cook last year, who appeared to be the staffs top target. Missed on Wingo and Hudson in this years class. Dokorian Moore in next years class. Not the best hit rate with his top WR targets fwiw
Click to expand...
how is moore a miss?
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
What did I miss? Wingo is a miss for UT? I see some Mizzou momentum, but no announcements.
Click to expand...
he got fong'd to mizzu.. Gerry earlier on youtube says he also likes Mizzu for him now too. He's gonna flip his pick
 
Thiefery said:
he got fong'd to mizzu.. Gerry earlier on youtube says he also likes Mizzu for him now too. He's gonna flip his pick
Click to expand...
I had read some stuff about Mizzou and big NIL, along with Burden. But then there was buzz solid to UT. Who knows ... long way to ESD.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
I had read some stuff about Mizzou and big NIL, along with Burden. But then there was buzz solid to UT. Who knows ... long way to ESD.
Click to expand...
he can make money in Austin as long as he plays well like Worthy.. there's so many local corps that contribute yearly to deals for the players there. I think Mizzu is a straight collective with a few boosters who are paying a salary.. so kid gonna get paid regardless

if he does choose Mizzu.. oh how I wish Marquis Johnson would hit the portal and come to UT.. love that kid
 
Thiefery said:
he can make money in Austin as long as he plays well like Worthy.. there's so many local corps that contribute yearly to deals for the players there. I think Mizzu is a straight collective with a few boosters who are paying a salary.. so kid gonna get paid regardless

if he does choose Mizzu.. oh how I wish Marquis Johnson would hit the portal and come to UT.. love that kid
Click to expand...
Texas should never lack for WRs. Nor will UGA. The Portal will be good for teams like that.

Mizzou's strategy is to pay for some very good 5*, and pay a lot. Luther Burden set the tone on that for them.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
Texas should never lack for WRs. Nor will UGA. The Portal will be good for teams like that.

Mizzou's strategy is to pay for some very good 5*, and pay a lot. Luther Burden set the tone on that for them.
Click to expand...
atleast they are trying to keep their homegrown kids in state..
 


Big win for Lanning and the Ducks. If the Ducks can close with Breland, Rushing and Johnson, that would be a great D-Line haul.
 
Average Recruit Ranking (247) on 10/15:

ACC:
Clemson - 91.48
Notre Dame** - 91.32
Florida State - 91.21
Miami FL - 89.84
Virginia Tech - 87.95
North Carolina - 87.74
Stanford - 87.61
NC State - 87.49
Duke - 87.11
Georgia Tech - 86.97
Pittsburgh - 86.95
Louisville - 86.94
SMU - 86.72
California - 86.71
Wake Forest - 86.35
Syracuse - 86.08
Virginia - 86.00
Boston College - 85.03

Big 12:
Colorado - 89.22
Texas Tech - 89.10
UCF - 88.35
Utah - 88.22
TCU - 87.75
Kansas - 87.35
Kansas State - 87.25
Arizona State - 86.79
Oklahoma State - 86.66
Baylor - 86.64
Cincinnati - 86.46
West Virginia - 86.22
Arizona - 86.15
Houston - 86.11
Iowa State - 85.89
BYU - 85.78

Big Ten:
Ohio State - 93.50
USC - 91.47
Oregon - 91.14
Penn State - 90.80
Michigan - 90.33
Wisconsin - 88.81
Washington - 88.46
UCLA - 88.45
Michigan State - 88.00
Iowa - 87.61
Nebraska - 87.49
Purdue - 87.27
Minnesota - 87.18
Rutgers - 86.87
Maryland - 86.63
Illinois - 86.59
Indiana - 86.23
Northwestern - 85.65

PAC:
Oregon State - 85.95
Washington State - 85.07

SEC:
Georgia - 93.52
Florida - 92.38
Texas A&M - 92.37
Alabama - 92.21
Tennessee - 91.75
Auburn - 91.65
Texas - 91.33
South Carolina - 90.93
LSU - 90.82
Oklahoma - 90.74
Arkansas - 89.51
Kentucky - 88.88
Ole Miss - 88.82
Missouri - 88.31
Mississippi State - 88.15
Vanderbilt - 86.81
 
duckboy33 said:
Average Recruit Ranking (247) on 10/15:

ACC:
Clemson - 91.48
Notre Dame** - 91.32
Florida State - 91.21
Miami FL - 89.84
Virginia Tech - 87.95
North Carolina - 87.74
Stanford - 87.61
NC State - 87.49
Duke - 87.11
Georgia Tech - 86.97
Pittsburgh - 86.95
Louisville - 86.94
SMU - 86.72
California - 86.71
Wake Forest - 86.35
Syracuse - 86.08
Virginia - 86.00
Boston College - 85.03

Big 12:
Colorado - 89.22
Texas Tech - 89.10
UCF - 88.35
Utah - 88.22
TCU - 87.75
Kansas - 87.35
Kansas State - 87.25
Arizona State - 86.79
Oklahoma State - 86.66
Baylor - 86.64
Cincinnati - 86.46
West Virginia - 86.22
Arizona - 86.15
Houston - 86.11
Iowa State - 85.89
BYU - 85.78

Big Ten:
Ohio State - 93.50
USC - 91.47
Oregon - 91.14
Penn State - 90.80
Michigan - 90.33
Wisconsin - 88.81
Washington - 88.46
UCLA - 88.45
Michigan State - 88.00
Iowa - 87.61
Nebraska - 87.49
Purdue - 87.27
Minnesota - 87.18
Rutgers - 86.87
Maryland - 86.63
Illinois - 86.59
Indiana - 86.23
Northwestern - 85.65

PAC:
Oregon State - 85.95
Washington State - 85.07

SEC:
Georgia - 93.52
Florida - 92.38
Texas A&M - 92.37
Alabama - 92.21
Tennessee - 91.75
Auburn - 91.65
Texas - 91.33
South Carolina - 90.93
LSU - 90.82
Oklahoma - 90.74
Arkansas - 89.51
Kentucky - 88.88
Ole Miss - 88.82
Missouri - 88.31
Mississippi State - 88.15
Vanderbilt - 86.81
Click to expand...
At this stage, you should use the Points, not Avg. Colorado is a great example. They may be at 89.22, but they only have 9 commits while Texas Tech has 20. It's not likely that Colorado will add many recruits that will increase their average.

Also the 247 Composite uses a formula to balance quantity and quality. It won't work for teams with only 9 recruits, but does for ones with 19 v. 26, as an example.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
At this stage, you should use the Points, not Avg. Colorado is a great example. They may be at 89.22, but they only have 9 commits while Texas Tech has 20. It's not likely that Colorado will add many recruits that will increase their average.

Also the 247 Composite uses a formula to balance quantity and quality. It won't work for teams with only 9 recruits, but does for ones with 19 v. 26, as an example.
Click to expand...

That's fair. It's hard to know what's the best way to gauge recruiting classes. Some teams like Colorado are taking small classes intentionally and plan on loading up in the portal. It's obviously impossible to know how teams will do with the portal right now.
 
duckboy33 said:
That's fair. It's hard to know what's the best way to gauge recruiting classes. Some teams like Colorado are taking small classes intentionally and plan on loading up in the portal. It's obviously impossible to know how teams will do with the portal right now.
Click to expand...
By the way, not being critical. I've really enjoyed you doing those over the years!
 
247 Composite Rankings on 10/19:

ACC:
1. Florida State (6th nationally)
2. Miami FL (13th nationally)
3. Clemson (16th nationally)
4. Stanford (24th nationally)
5. North Carolina (27th nationally)
6. NC State (30th nationally)
7. Georgia Tech (32nd nationally)
8. Pittsburgh (35th nationally)
9. Duke (36th nationally)
10. Virginia Tech (41st nationally)
11. Wake Forest (47th nationally)
12. Syracuse (53rd nationally)
13. Louisville (54th nationally)
14. California (63rd nationally)
15. Virginia (74th nationally)
16. SMU (80th nationally)
17. Boston College (82nd nationally)

Big 12:
1. Texas Tech (23rd nationally)
2. UCF (29th nationally)
3. TCU (38th nationally)
4. Cincinnati (43rd nationally)
5. Arizona (44th nationally)
6. West Virginia (46th nationally)
7. Kansas (49th nationally)
8. Arizona State (50th nationally)
9. Iowa State (52nd nationally)
10. Oklahoma State (55th nationally)
11. Baylor (61st nationally)
12. Utah (65th nationally)
13. Colorado (66th nationally)
14. BYU (68th nationally)
15. Houston (94th nationally)
16. Kansas State (98th nationally)

Big Ten:
1. Ohio State (2nd nationally)
2. Oregon (9th nationally)
3. Penn State (11th nationally)
4. Michigan (14th nationally)
5. USC (19th nationally)
6. Wisconsin (25th nationally)
7. Nebraska (26th nationally)
8. Purdue (28th nationally)
9. Minnesota (31st nationally)
10. Iowa (33rd nationally)
11. Rutgers (34th nationally)
12. Maryland (39th nationally)
13. Washington (45th nationally)
14. Illinois (48th nationally)
15. Indiana (51st nationally)
16. UCLA (56th nationally)
17. Michigan State (75th nationally)
18. Northwestern (87th nationally)

PAC:
1. Washington State (57th nationally)
2. Oregon State (62nd nationally)

SEC:
1. Georgia (1st nationally)
2. Florida (3rd nationally)
3. Alabama (4th nationally)
4. Texas A&M (5th nationally)
5. Oklahoma (7th nationally)
6. Tennessee (10th nationally)
7. LSU (12th nationally)
8. Texas (15th nationally)
9. Auburn (17th nationally)
10. South Carolina (18th nationally)
11. Arkansas (20th nationally)
12. Ole Miss (21st nationally)
13. Kentucky (22nd nationally)
14. Vanderbilt (37th nationally)
15. Missouri (40th nationally)
16. Mississippi State (42nd nationally)

Top 10 Independents/G5:
1. Notre Dame (8th nationally)
2. USF (58th nationally)
3. ECU (59th nationally)
4. UNLV (60th nationally)
5. Colorado State (64th nationally)
6. Tulane (67th nationally)
7. Appalachian State (69th nationally)
8. Southern Miss (70th nationally)
9. Miami OH (71st nationally)
10. Boise State (72nd nationally)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top