- Joined
- Sep 3, 2020
- Posts
- 29,573
- Reaction score
- 69,872
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00




I’ve been saying this for yearsNeed to get rid of all conferences. Its a waste
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’ve been saying this for yearsNeed to get rid of all conferences. Its a waste
Guys, listen: NOBODY wants Miami.
Guys, listen: NOBODY wants Miami.
Need to get rid of all conferences. Its a waste
UVA would be a score for the BIG. They play school.
apparently, CJ STroud did too*Cardale Jones has left the chat
apparently, CJ STroud did too
nothing the part about playing school was a joke about that fake ass assessment score that said he was dumb as a rock.What did he say?
how would you know, cowardsapparently thats how Texas feels since they kill all of their conferences
Oregon is nowhere near the level of institution UVA is.They are not wanting to take Ore and UW, both of whom would bring way more than UVa.
I agree they play school, but not at the cost of millions per team.
Plus, they have been clear they don't want to kill the PAC, although they basically already did. Do they want to kill the ACC?
i wouldn't mind UVA in the SEC..beautiful campusOregon is nowhere near the level of institution UVA is.
They’d gladly kill the ACC for UNC, UVA and Georgia Tech. Not sure ND ever will put itself so close to so many in conference rivals.
Small private basketball school.....send em to the big eastGuys, listen: NOBODY wants Miami.
Dude that laid it out has an impressive resume.i wouldn't mind UVA in the SEC..beautiful campus
it's enough for me to choose them over udub and oregonDude that laid it out has an impressive resume.
The SEC is not taking VaTech and NCSU.And we very much disagree on teams that are worth bringing in. Sure it’s about eyeballs but given Vat Tech and NCst decent history and in new states I think they are very good adds. Given the choice I don’t see UNC picking the SEC. Truthfully I can see the SEC adding:
FSU
Clemson
VaTech
NCSt
BIG adding:
UNC
UVA
Miami
Georgia Tech
Rank | School and Avg Attendance | Conf | P5/G5 |
10 | Clemson — 2.59M | ACC | P5 |
15 | Florida State — 2.03M | ACC | P5 |
43 | NC State — 881K | ACC | P5 |
46 | North Carolina — 849K | ACC | P5 |
49 | Georgia Tech — 837K | ACC | P5 |
59 | Miami FL— 608K | ACC | P5 |
76 | Virginia Tech — 264K | ACC | P5 |
79 | Virginia — 237K | ACC | P5 |
91 | Duke — 115.7K | ACC | P5 |
UNC, UVa, and GT? Not a chance. They don't want to lose money. Over the last 12 years, UVa and UNC each would have received a single CFP share in a 12 team CFP. TV numbers are horrible.Oregon is nowhere near the level of institution UVA is.
They’d gladly kill the ACC for UNC, UVA and Georgia Tech. Not sure ND ever will put itself so close to so many in conference rivals.
Rank | School and Avg Attendance | Conf | P5/G5 |
46 | North Carolina — 849K | ACC | P5 |
49 | Georgia Tech — 837K | ACC | P5 |
79 | Virginia — 237K | ACC | P5 |
They already tried to get them ten years ago.UNC, UVa, and GT? Not a chance. They don't want to lose money. Over the last 12 years, UVa and UNC each would have received a single CFP share in a 12 team CFP. TV numbers are horrible.
Rank School and Avg Attendance Conf P5/G5 46 North Carolina — 849K ACC P5 49 Georgia Tech — 837K ACC P5 79 Virginia — 237K ACC P5
No TV, no CFP chances, no invite.
10 years ago in CFB was a totally different market when regions and states mattered. They don't any more. What matters is eyeballs and CFP shares. They don't provide any of that. They would lose in excess of $150 million every year inviting those teams into the B1G.They already tried to get them ten years ago.
Great school and the Atlanta market.
It’s not all football with the BIG. Never has been.
If they tried to poach from the SEC, it’d be Vandy they’d go after.
Regions and states don’t matter?10 years ago in CFB was a totally different market when regions and states mattered. They don't any more. What matters is eyeballs and CFP shares. They don't provide any of that. They would lose in excess of $150 million every year inviting those teams into the B1G.
The B1G isn't going to expand for the sake of expanding. This would be expanding for the sake of expanding.
Because the market theory of CFB economics the Atlanta market isn't nearly as relevant in 2023 and going forward.
It's never just about football. It's about money. The B1G does require AAC membership, but that doesn't replace the need to earn their $100 million+ share. None of those three come close. I mean, it's not even a close call on UVa.
Vandy would laugh at them. I'm a Vandy grad. Vandy is not going anywhere.