Poll Bears 2024 qb

Who will be Bears next qb

  • Caleb Williams

    Votes: 13 36.1%

  • Drake Maye

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • JJ McCarty

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Michael Penix

    Votes: 2 5.6%

  • Jayden Daniels

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • Justin Fields

    Votes: 14 38.9%

  • Kburjr,Nos annd Mofo put ketchup on potato salad

    Votes: 5 13.9%

  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    36
TaikoTiger said:
269 Yrds/G 13 TD/5 INT before he got hurt. Not necessary blowing up but definitely validate why he was picked at the top of the draft and confident he's a future franchise QB.


No I don't believe Fields is the problem. Bears is just a young team who's been rebuilding the last couple of years and currently have a ton of cap space. I like Justin Fields a lot and wouldn't mind keeping him and building around him. But I'm also realistic to know that there are upgrades in this draft at QB. If the Bears are so bad at developing QBs then maybe we should just trade Fields to a team who can and draft a QB who needs less developing
Click to expand...
269 ypg in his rookie year, with the worst o-line in the league, average WRs and a weak D.

In 40 games, Fields has surpassed 269 yards in a game, 4 times.
 
Kburjr said:
Please, Bears, just keep doing what you are doing.
Click to expand...
Go Away GIF
 
Wood20ks said:
Well then why the Burrow comparison,if you wanna compare qbs,compare him with Trubisky.....
Click to expand...
I didn't bring Burrow into this conversation. If you read, I even said repeatedly that's an awful comparison.
 
TaikoTiger said:
269 Yrds/G 13 TD/5 INT before he got hurt. Not necessary blowing up but definitely validate why he was picked at the top of the draft and confident he's a future franchise QB.


No I don't believe Fields is the problem. Bears is just a young team who's been rebuilding the last couple of years and currently have a ton of cap space. I like Justin Fields a lot and wouldn't mind keeping him and building around him. But I'm also realistic to know that there are upgrades in this draft at QB. If the Bears are so bad at developing QBs then maybe we should just trade Fields to a team who can and draft a QB who needs less developing
Click to expand...
He also threw the ball 40 times a game. Again, he's a bad comparison for Fields, but he didn't start his career white hot or anything.

I'm not sure there's a QB in this draft who is further along in his development than Fields currently, or is even an upgrade. I think he's got a very obvious connection with DJ Moore and Cole Kmet, which is something to continue to build on especially with a new OC. Guess time will tell.
 
Across The Field said:
Oh, Jim
Click to expand...
If I'm an NFL team I'm not risking a pick on Williams and there is a valid argument for picking McCarthy. The kid is super smart, has ability, and an unbelievable work effort. He is never going to be a Mahomes but could be a Kirk Cousins type and that ain't bad.
 
Wild Turkey said:
If I'm an NFL team I'm not risking a pick on Williams and there is a valid argument for picking McCarthy. The kid is super smart, has ability, and an unbelievable work effort. He is never going to be a Mahomes but could be a Kirk Cousins type and that ain't bad.
Click to expand...
If you have the option of drafting "maybe Kirk Cousins" or trading down with some idiot that wants to put all their eggs in the Caleb basket and getting a massive haul, I'm taking the latter without a second thought.
 
Across The Field said:
If you have the option of drafting "maybe Kirk Cousins" or trading down with some idiot that wants to put all their eggs in the Caleb basket and getting a massive haul, I'm taking the latter without a second thought.
Click to expand...
The no-brainer is to trade down without any doubt.
 
Wild Turkey said:
The no-brainer is to trade down without any doubt.
Click to expand...
If there was an Andrew Luck in this class I wouldn't blame them at all for trading Fields and pulling the trigger at #1, but I don't see one. However, the chance to build up the rest of the team with high-end young talent is just too appealing. Fields needs to improve, no doubt, and they're finally bringing in a coherent OC. If he's their QB and he can't improve, they've gotta go elsewhere in 2025 no doubt, but what better way to break in a new QB than with a supremely talented team around him? Trading down seems like a win/win to me any way you slice it.
 
Across The Field said:
If there was an Andrew Luck in this class I wouldn't blame them at all for trading Fields and pulling the trigger at #1, but I don't see one. However, the chance to build up the rest of the team with high-end young talent is just too appealing. Fields needs to improve, no doubt, and they're finally bringing in a coherent OC. If he's their QB and he can't improve, they've gotta go elsewhere in 2025 no doubt, but what better way to break in a new QB than with a supremely talented team around him? Trading down seems like a win/win to me any way you slice it.
Click to expand...
I don't hate Fields. I remember what he did in the playoffs against Clemson and he went for 385 yards and had 6 TDs against a very good team.

He has the tools.
 
Wild Turkey said:
I don't hate Fields. I remember what he did in the playoffs against Clemson and he went for 385 yards and had 6 TDs against a very good team.

He has the tools.
Click to expand...
He's definitely got the tools to be a really good QB, if not better. The Bears haven't helped him much, but he's also got areas of improvement. Good news is he's still young, so if his future isn't in Chicago he has plenty of time to put together a great career.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top