Big Ten Basketball

rmilia1 said:
Guess it depends on what the committee deems a bad loss. Traditionally itd be Q3 or Q4 losses in which case RU only has 3. If they include Q2 then itd be 6 but that would be unisual although theres obviously a difference in Q2 losses when you look at them indivdually
Click to expand...
yeah, i'm not a fan of the current quad system

Rutgers has lost to six bad teams. If you're an NCAAT team, you can't have six losses to teams that aren't in the top 80-90 on kenpom and NET.
 
Hitman Hart said:
yeah, i'm not a fan of the current quad system

Rutgers has lost to six bad teams. If you're an NCAAT team, you can't have six losses to teams that aren't in the top 80-90 on kenpom and NET.
Click to expand...

Thats a fair viewpoint forsure.

Unfortuantely resume wise, only 3 as rmilia stated will be considered that. Youre allowed to lose road games to middling power 5 teams.
 
rmilia1 said:
Guess it depends on what the committee deems a bad loss. Traditionally itd be Q3 or Q4 losses in which case RU only has 3. If they include Q2 then itd be 6 but that would be unisual although theres obviously a difference in Q2 losses when you look at them indivdually
Click to expand...

In the past, I felt like if you were OVER .500 in a good conference and had beaten a couple of the top teams, you were on the bubble.

Regardless of stinkers you had, unless you lost a lot.

I think the new NET system is tougher on bad losses...
 
jontaejones said:
In the past, I felt like if you were OVER .500 in a good conference and had beaten a couple of the top teams, you were on the bubble.

Regardless of stinkers you had, unless you lost a lot.

I think the new NET system is tougher on bad losses...
Click to expand...
Yeah i mean i dont really get it

Wazzu has 0 Q1 wins , 3 Q3 losses and 1 Q4 loss and is 40 spots higher in NET than Rutgers lol
 
Nebraska leads Keegan Murray by 1 at halftime in Iowa City 25-24

Sadly for the Huskers the other Hawks have 29 pts as well
 
Nebraska might be able to beat Iowa in baseball. Other than that it's only their woman that can beat Iowa in volleyball.
 
Nice first half by gophers. Probably need more from Willis to get upset
 
Kburjr said:
But, he is our douche. I look at him like I look at enforcers in hockey. I'd like to be better than that but understand their value.
Click to expand...

Difference is, enforcers in hockey are the guys out there fighting and backing up their teammates.

Davison just cheap shots(sometimes with underlying homosexual motives) and scrams. Hes not playing phsyical bully ball and he sure as shit isnt gonna scrum with someone.

Hes the type of Dbag that leaves his teammate out to dry.
 
Ok Rutgers has to be in now

Im putting my foot doen here lol
 
Kburjr said:
I ain't gonna look, but has any other team beat 4 ranked opponents in a row?
Click to expand...
No clue but if youve got 7 Q1 wins and youre 10-5 in the B10 you gotta be in
 
rmilia1 said:
No clue but if youve got 7 Q1 wins and youre 10-5 in the B10 you gotta be in
Click to expand...

That team is really a PITA...if they get a lead on you they're bringing the game at you.
 
rmilia1 said:
No clue but if youve got 7 Q1 wins and youre 10-5 in the B10 you gotta be in
Click to expand...
Yeah, I don't see how they aren't in. There are several teams that are hard to figure out but would create real problems in the tourney. Rutgers is one of those IMO.

And Rutgers (and the NFL Bengals) are exactly the type of teams the traditionalists in college football want to keep out of the playoffs by limiting expansion. They want no part of a team that has the potential to get hot and on a roll in a playoff run. They want punitive action for early season screw ups. Or in horse racing terms. They only want front runners...not come from behind horses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top