Yeah -- this is Nebraska's problem. They have next to no instate talent and they don't have any talent in surrounding states.
Now that they are in the B1G -- they are a bottom feeder academically compared to the rest of the conference, so that doesn't help them either.
They now have to sell kids in the SW and West that they will be playing half their season in the Midwest.
I don't think they have a shot to be a national contender ever again, unless they moved the school.
I think they can get to be like a Wisconsin, but I think that is there ceiling in today's CFB landscape.
I am going to get trolled for this one but is the B1G really anything that special in Academics.
I would take Vanderbilt over any B1G school. Plus Academic rankings seem to be more about how aligned the school is with the mainstream liberal media than it is about Academic performance. Look at Texas A&M, you wouldn't consider them anything special but they seem to graduate the most students that get employed.
I know Michigan and Northwestern have a great reputation. Purdue is known for its engineering. But most of the rest of the schools seem to be no different than any of the other Power 5 leagues, just big public schools. I don't see them employing anymore people than UT, UK, or any insert public school from any other league.
I would say also that both the ACC and Pac12 have stronger schools. ACC has Duke, UNC, Boston College, Notre Dame (kind of), Georgia Tech, Virginia, and even Virginia Tech which is known for its engineering.
I would take the four Pac12 California schools over anyone in the B1G except may Northwestern.
Not trying to diminish the B1G Academically but I just don't see enough there to justify the arrogant attitude that they have. Unless your the Ivy League, MIT, Stanford, Cal, Vanderbilt, Washington U in St Louis, John-Hopkins, Emery & Henry, etc.; I don't think you have that much bragging rights.
BTW, my sister graduated in the Science field from Vanderbilt and did a lot of summer internships that included Duke, UMass, BYU, etc. Out of all the schools, Duke was the least impressive and UMass probably had the best program but wasn't on the radar (at least from the perspective of her ability to grow and learn).
Another issue with these "highly" ranked schools is that they are graded by professors. Professors are graded by their ability to research and write papers, not necessarily their ability to teach.