
Don't think the trade is bad enough to veto. For me I'm mostly against vetoing trades unless it's colluding because I've been in leagues where every trade gets shoot down for not being perfectly balance. On the other hand, being mostly inactive and randomly trading away the #1 overall draft pick can be seen as throwing it away (colluding). As of today we have trade veto disabled, is this something we want to enable for this season or next? Do we want to vote on the current trade (if we have 7 votes to veto in this thread by end of day, I can reverse the trade)?
For Inactive players, maybe we'll just look for other players next year. If your lineup isn't set for 3+ weeks throughout the year, than your spot is up for a newcomer next year.
I don't think the trade is unfair at all.
He's giving up on this season and trading the #1 pick in this years draft, his highest scoring player while involved in the race for a playoff spot.
Teams that are not active should not be allowed to make a trade that will have an effect on the other teams who have been active!
He just said this!
I just set my lineup
He put Shedro Louis in his starting lineup who has 19 carries for 55 yards and 0 tds.
He could have dumped Louis and picked up one of 50+ guys who actually play, proving he has no interest in this league.