Last movie you watched and rating (1-10)

Grant Ward said:
To Catch A Killer - Netflix
8/10


Going in, I figure I'm about to see a cheesy crime drama. I couldn't have been more wrong. I didn't expect to see so many graphic kill shots. The last 2/3rd of the movie was very intense.
Click to expand...

Sounds like I need to put this on my to do list.....
 
dikowt dowg said:
Mad Max: Furiosa 8 / 10. Well done for a mad max movie.

This movie should have come out before Mad Max: Fury. It's the prequel to Fury and one of the reasons I didn't like Fury is because the lead character shows up out of nowhere with five hot women even though we are at a time when humanity has collapsed. It didn't make any sense.

Well...Furiosa answers all of the question I had about Fury.
Click to expand...

You gave it a better rating than I did......Id give it a 6.

The ai special effects is hirribke,and Aana-Jiy-Taylor is nit a good actor.
 
Key Largo

MASSIVE

It even has Tonto.
 
Mickey 17.
2/10
Terrible.
Narration. Didn’t explore the sci for landscape. So boring.
 
Kraven the Hunter 7 / 10. Decent story. It's on netflix now.
 
The Gorge —probably a solid 7 because it was a different concept, had some action and romance mixed in with a bit of humor.
 
EEPHUS
6/10
Cute little baseball movie about small New England town has beens playing the last baseball game of their lives before their field gets plowed under. Worth a see.
 
Kraven the Hunter.... one of the worst movies I have seen in a long while. So dumb and very poorly acted. 3 maybe a 4 if I am feeling generous, out of 10.

I thought the Venom movies were bad, but I would rather watch those any time than ever watch Kraven again.
 
temptresstoo said:
The Gorge —probably a solid 7 because it was a different concept, had some action and romance mixed in with a bit of humor.
Click to expand...
I liked the idea enough. What's her big eyed face kinda sucked tho, and I don't know what has become of CGI, but it sucks today. Decent chance they are just stealing money at this point. OG Jurassic Park was a fuckin lifetime ago, and it stands up to and above most shit today. The hollow men were pretty lame. I kept expecting BIGGER.

It was a once over, so I'd prolly rate it a 6 on premise alone.
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
Random pic I saw

View attachment 134115
Click to expand...
It is a little liberal with the timeframe.

If this were made in the 70s, than Arnold was still an unknown and about 10 years from being ready to carry a film (he was still just set dressing in Terminator). Nit sure Clint would have been old enough yet to command the screen over the rest at that time. Ferigno is a lazy casting for Hulk. And who would play BRUCE (not DAVID)?

If you go 80s, than Burt and Redford are probably too old for Stark and Rogers. Alda is DEFINITELY too old for Hawkeye. Arnold is perfect, though.

Good cast photo, though.
 
Wood20ks said:
Nosferatu 7 of 10.....

They could have made a better vampire than what they did,plus did not like the ending.......
Click to expand...
i kind of liked what they did with him as a vampire as it was different from the norm.
 
SU Nittany Tide said:
15% from critics but 73% of audience reviews are positive on rotten tomatoes. I haven't seen it.
Click to expand...
as they said, it's on netflix now. it was just a buildup for a movie. so fucking boring. (I see IMDB is 5.4).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top