Lincoln Riley is a dumbass

Again you are living in a 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s format.

Look at Tuscaloosa. It is literally in the middle of no where yet players are getting great NIL deals. Companies will go were the wins and big games are at no matter what part of the country they are in.

You act like the world isn't remote and that companies are tied down to physical locations.
It's amazing how badly you miss key points and are incapable of understanding how shit really works.

USC NIL capabilities has nothing to do with Alabama and everything to do with USC. USC is a national brand, in a major city with massive corporate headquarters. USC has one of the top film schools in the country and that is enough to get these athletes in movies, TV, music videos and who knows what else. If USC gets hot and in the conversation money will dump on campus.

Miami is a prime example as they have sucked but they've gotten NIL deals that cover that entire team because of the money that is in the city of Miami. You're an idiot if you think differently.
 
It's amazing how badly you miss key points and are incapable of understanding how shit really works.

USC NIL capabilities has nothing to do with Alabama and everything to do with USC. USC is a national brand, in a major city with massive corporate headquarters. USC has one of the top film schools in the country and that is enough to get these athletes in movies, TV, music videos and who knows what else. If USC gets hot and in the conversation money will dump on campus.

Miami is a prime example as they have sucked but they've gotten NIL deals that cover that entire team because of the money that is in the city of Miami. You're an idiot if you think differently.
I think the major difference that people are just glancing over -- yes USC and OU are top 10 programs in CFB. But people don't move to Norman Oklahoma just to live in Norman Oklahoma. People flock to Southern Cal to live in Southern Cal. That, alone, is a huge selling point for coaches and recruits. Add in USC's financial influence and you have a huge advantage over OU -- especially OU in the SEC.
 
Too many people at lakes and beaches


Depends on the area. There are some pretty remote and awesome lake shore areas in Michigan:


i-f29MWwm-X3.jpg



Grand-Portal-Point-0025.jpg




Spray-Falls.jpg



michigan-lighthouses-winter
 
It's amazing how badly you miss key points and are incapable of understanding how shit really works.

USC NIL capabilities has nothing to do with Alabama and everything to do with USC. USC is a national brand, in a major city with massive corporate headquarters. USC has one of the top film schools in the country and that is enough to get these athletes in movies, TV, music videos and who knows what else. If USC gets hot and in the conversation money will dump on campus.

Miami is a prime example as they have sucked but they've gotten NIL deals that cover that entire team because of the money that is in the city of Miami. You're an idiot if you think differently.

You act like players in Tuscaloosa, Norman, Eugene, Baton Rouge, etc. cannot get great NIL deals or that these schools are also not national brands. They can get just as good deals as USC if not better.

USC's film school has very little to do with sports. Sure it is entertainment industry but movie making does not translate to sports licensing deals. In many ways, you would be better off in a place like NYC where ESPN is headquartered.

I agree USC has licensing power but so did Oklahoma and Oklahoma was far more relevant right now in football than USC. This is even true with LSU who won a title in 2019. I don't see USC having an advantage over either program.
 
lol

You: No one on the West Coast gives a shit about football or whether or not USC wins.

Also you: If USC loses 3 games, they'll be looking to move on to another coach.

You need to pick a lane.

I've been reading his posts in this thread and it appears he is trolling. If not he is stupid. One or the other is needed to explain it. He makes an assertion, gets someone to give an agreeable comment about it, then he takes the opposing view to argue what he earlier said. He's just looking to argue, troll or he's stupid. One of the three.
 
You act like players in Tuscaloosa, Norman, Eugene, Baton Rouge, etc. cannot get great NIL deals or that these schools are also not national brands. They can get just as good deals as USC if not better.

USC's film school has very little to do with sports. Sure it is entertainment industry but movie making does not translate to sports licensing deals. In many ways, you would be better off in a place like NYC where ESPN is headquartered.

I agree USC has licensing power but so did Oklahoma and Oklahoma was far more relevant right now in football than USC. This is even true with LSU who won a title in 2019. I don't see USC having an advantage over either program.
I literally haven’t mentioned any other school. My statements were supporting @trojanfan12 statement that USC has one of the best NIL opportunities in the country and that is 100% correct.

It is not a reflection on any other school other than the resources available to USC are as good or better than anyone in the country. I don’t even know why this is debatable.
 
I've been reading his posts in this thread and it appears he is trolling. If not he is stupid. One or the other is needed to explain it. He makes an assertion, gets someone to give an agreeable comment about it, then he takes the opposing view to argue what he earlier said. He's just looking to argue, troll or he's stupid. One of the three.
He’s that stupid.
 
I literally haven’t mentioned any other school. My statements were supporting @trojanfan12 statement that USC has one of the best NIL opportunities in the country and that is 100% correct.

It is not a reflection on any other school other than the resources available to USC are as good or better than anyone in the country. I don’t even know why this is debatable.

No, you are arguing that Oklahoma had crap NIL opportunities which isn't true. It is based on a limited understanding of NIL.

Under your logic, Alabama would not have great NIL opportunities because they are not next to a major media city.
 
You notice how my posts don't resort to insults towards other posters. It is because I actually have class unlike troll garbage like @Wild Turkey
 
No, you are arguing that Oklahoma had crap NIL opportunities which isn't true. It is based on a limited understanding of NIL.

Under your logic, Alabama would not have great NIL opportunities because they are not next to a major media city.
No that isn’t what I said at all. Not even close. You are making assumptions based on what you think but not based on fact and that is your massive downfall. You really need to actually read and think about these posts before you respond and look like an idiot.
 
Again you are living in a 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s format.

Look at Tuscaloosa.

Tuscaloosa population = .09 million

Los Angeles population = 3.96 million


Yeah.....should be no difference.



Got damn that boy dumb!
 
This is the worst @Volbound1700 take since he asked how to pleasure a woman.

Do you plan to clarify what was factually wrong with my statements?

1. Taxes in California are far greater than Oklahoma and Louisiana - This is correct
2. Oklahoma is in a far better spot from a competitive situation than USC - This is correct
3. Moving from a program that is winning 10/11 games a year to one that is struggling isn't necessarily a major improvement - This is correct

Tell me where I am wrong on any of these statements? You don't have anything other than troll arguments.
 
Back
Top