Minor League Football

Na if Oregon got a minor league team separate from the colleges but because of the colleges it would be something like Oregon Lumberjacks or Bigfoot
Building Burners sounds more current.
 
I’m just waiting for when colleges can release guys at any time and trade them to other teams.

These guys want to get paid then let’s get real and treat them like pros. If they want to be able to transfer at any point then schools should be able to release them at any point and pick up other guys.

Money changes everything.
 
Building Burners sounds more current.
1 i was told to keep politics off the football pages
2. portland is the biggest city but a small part of oregon. 4.27 Mil in Oregon 661,419 in Portland.
3. Portland is still standing and in fact not burned down.
92.jpg
 
What I’ve written on other threads:
My assumption is that because of status quo AND big monies’ hesitance to try new things AND no other entity being big enough to pull off anything new AND the NFL already enjoying a free minor league (cfb)…
That the top ~64-80 teams will form a de facto minor league:
- It’ll still be tied to colleges.
- The NCAA will not be involved. They wouldn’t bring anything to this new table.
- They will have rules for revenue sharing, media interaction, transfer protocols, player compensation, etc… just like any other for-profit sports league.
They will do this because of the threat of governmental involvement and to survive as a legitimate and viable sports league given the new environment.
Also, this should have happened decades ago.
 
Because the principals have been cut out from proper compensation for half a century, at least. For starters.
plus, besides the rah rah siss boom bah, college football is truly an ugly, unfair, dirty institution.
Not even remotely close of half a century. It was even until the late 90’s when tv deals started blowing up that you could even make a decent argument of the players deserving compensation. And even now 99% of college football players are massively over paid in their compensation.
 
Can't see it happening ...

1. who is going to pay for it? The NFL won't.

2. If you think college football players get taken advantage of, talk to a minor league baseball player ... they laugh at how good the college football players have it. Minor league football isn't going to happen.

3. I like my college ball because they are students, at some level. I don't mind they get academic money, and with the Alford ruling, they will get a ton more of that - laptops, iPads, internships, etc. I don't mind they get NIL money ... think that is great. Don't want pay to play, nor do a majority of fans of the game.

4. CFB has never been more popular, and it will be when we all die.
1. They definitely have to have someone or a group of rich people to fund it for the first few years. But just like the second go around of the XFL, if it takes off people with want to spend money. But unless the NFL invests then there isn’t any real way a league consisting of 18-20 years old is going to succeed because the compensation they want they will never get.

2. Without question football players don’t understand real life but IMO a big issue college football players is they compare themselves to basketball instead of the good analogy you use of baseball. An 18-20 year can go to the NBA and hold their own. No 18-20 year old football player can hold their own because any thought of a minor league is going to be like baseball and have guys cut from NFL teams.
 
The B12 schools and ACC schools will implore the member schools of the B10, SEC, and PAC to firm this new NCAA-less union, and that’ll probably happen pretty soon. All the incentive structures are there. Even the SEC member schools are incentivized to form this new league and negotiate an even bigger chunk of the monies involved.
we’ll prolly see lots of the outside schools suing , ratting on, etc, the elite3 (pac b10 sec) schools to pressure them to form this new league.
 
The B12 schools and ACC schools will implore the member schools of the B10, SEC, and PAC to firm this new NCAA-less union, and that’ll probably happen pretty soon. All the incentive structures are there. Even the SEC member schools are incentivized to form this new league and negotiate an even bigger chunk of the monies involved.
we’ll prolly see lots of the outside schools suing , ratting on, etc, the elite3 (pac b10 sec) schools to pressure them to form this new league.
Why would the SEC care about the NCAA? They don’t abide by their rules anyways.
 
Why would the SEC care about the NCAA? They don’t abide by their rules anyways.
They wouldn’t. Did you read my posts? The NCAA brings nothing to the new table.
 
They wouldn’t. Did you read my posts? The NCAA brings nothing to the new table.
They don’t need to form a new league to avoid the NCAA rules. They don’t give a shit about them now. They are above the NCAA rules.
 
Why would the SEC care about the NCAA? They don’t abide by their rules anyways.

They wouldn’t. Did you read my posts? The NCAA brings nothing to the new table.
Who besides me believes the schools will break away from the NCAA and then they'll create a new organization that looks just about like the NCAA?
 
Who besides me believes the schools will break away from the NCAA and then they'll create a new organization that looks just about like the NCAA?
Well. I said it explicitly. So: Me.
Unless, the contention here is how much it looks like the ncaa? But I doubt you’d ask such a begging question. So, I’m going assume the best.
What I’ve written on other threads:
My assumption is that because of status quo AND big monies’ hesitance to try new things AND no other entity being big enough to pull off anything new AND the NFL already enjoying a free minor league (cfb)…
That the top ~64-80 teams will form a de facto minor league:
- It’ll still be tied to colleges.
- The NCAA will not be involved. They wouldn’t bring anything to this new table.
- They will have rules for revenue sharing, media interaction, transfer protocols, player compensation, etc… just like any other for-profit sports league.
They will do this because of the threat of governmental involvement and to survive as a legitimate and viable sports league given the new environment.
Also, this should have happened decades ago.
 
The B12 schools and ACC schools will implore the member schools of the B10, SEC, and PAC to firm this new NCAA-less union, and that’ll probably happen pretty soon. All the incentive structures are there. Even the SEC member schools are incentivized to form this new league and negotiate an even bigger chunk of the monies involved.
we’ll prolly see lots of the outside schools suing , ratting on, etc, the elite3 (pac b10 sec) schools to pressure them to form this new league.
Very much so does college football need the NCAA. Without the NCAA regulation there isn’t a single conference other than the SEC. Ohio State never would have been in the college playoff last year without the NCAA allowing individual conference makes their own rules declaring their own champions. If anything was proven from last year it is that the SEC doesn’t need the NCAA.
 
Very much so does college football need the NCAA. Without the NCAA regulation there isn’t a single conference other than the SEC. Ohio State never would have been in the college playoff last year without the NCAA allowing individual conference makes their own rules declaring their own champions. If anything was proven from last year it is that the SEC doesn’t need the NCAA.
I don’t know where to start with this illogic.
“without ncaa, schools can’t do what they want.”
Ummm ok
 
Very much so does college football need the NCAA. Without the NCAA regulation there isn’t a single conference other than the SEC. Ohio State never would have been in the college playoff last year without the NCAA allowing individual conference makes their own rules declaring their own champions. If anything was proven from last year it is that the SEC doesn’t need the NCAA.
You don’t think whatever network owns the broadcast rights would want tOSU in the tourney without the NCAA?

Without the NCAA, tOSU wouldn’t need the NCAA to allow conferences to make their own rules. They’d just make their own rules.

No Conference needs the NCAA. And neither do you.
 
You don’t think whatever network owns the broadcast rights would want tOSU in the tourney without the NCAA?

Without the NCAA, tOSU wouldn’t need the NCAA to allow conferences to make their own rules. They’d just make their own rules.

No Conference needs the NCAA. And neither do you.
Of course a network, but networks aren’t going to run the super league. It isn’t the NCAA Ohio State has to worry about, it is the B1G. The B1G makes the schedules, determines who is their champion. Determines X, Y and Z. Ohio State needs to the NCAA much more than the B1G.

As long as there are conferences then yes. The NCAA is a governing body overall conferences.
 
Back
Top