More Michigan Cheating

osubuckeye89 said:
My favorite of their stupids with the sign stealing thing is them mocking the whole thing with the "LOL THEY ARE REALLY WORRIED ABOUT GUYS WITH IPHONES IN THE CROWD" deflection.

Are Michigan fans living in a world where everyone is still walking around with Nokia bricks? Maybe 20 years ago when cell phones had potato level video quality that logic would hold water but we live in world where they do shit like this with Iphones now

Click to expand...
In the last game we played against ohio state ... did we steal your signs? If yes, why weren't y'all smart enough have different signs coming in?
 
osubuckeye89 said:
You don't but a lot of the fanbase still likes to play the high brow card that Michigan "doesn't do things like everyone else!" which is of course complete bullshit and always has been.
Click to expand...
I am very high brow as far as my education goes. Also, my football team has has won more games than anyone else. I just don't believing in all the bitching and moaning after a loss. Get better!!!
 
ericd7633 said:
Do you realize this was decided on over a year ago? The article you're quoting about tiebreakers has no bearing on anything. So, yes I don't think you understand what the article is about as @WhosYourDawggy said.
Click to expand...
WhosYourDawggy said:
LOL ... imagine being caught being so dumb and not saying, "my bad, guys, I see what they are saying now."

Instead you make some bullshit up that isn't even related to the article you cited. JFC, dimwit, get your head out of your ass.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how you guys don't understand this? 18 team conferences filled with massive teams will equal more losses. The G5 gets one of those auto-bids, and can compete for the other 4 spots. Conference championships functionally no longer being considered beyond those 5 spots is actually crazy. It means every single year 1 P5 champ will be competing with non-champs for a spot with the rest of the field, and the championship isn't considered for a tiebreaker.
 
Across The Field said:
That's the problem, he's so stupid that by the time he's run out of excuses and desperate measures to try and manipulate the topic so he can come out (in his mind) not looking wrong, he's already lost the plot and just ends up looking like a dipshit. Rinse and repeat.
Click to expand...
I look forward to pointing this out when this experiment screws over a team within the next few seasons.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
I'm not sure how you guys don't understand this? 18 team conferences filled with massive teams will equal more losses. The G5 gets one of those auto-bids, and can compete for the other 4 spots. Conference championships functionally no longer being considered beyond those 5 spots is actually crazy. It means every single year 1 P5 champ will be competing with non-champs for a spot with the rest of the field, and the championship isn't considered for a tiebreaker.
Click to expand...

The five highest conference champions automatically get selected. Do you understand that? Do you think the champion of the 6th best league will be deserving of a spot? Of course not, so this literally means nothing. Also, do you realize that there are only 4 power conferences now? It sure doesn't seem like it.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
I'm not sure how you guys don't understand this? 18 team conferences filled with massive teams will equal more losses. The G5 gets one of those auto-bids, and can compete for the other 4 spots. Conference championships functionally no longer being considered beyond those 5 spots is actually crazy. It means every single year 1 P5 champ will be competing with non-champs for a spot with the rest of the field, and the championship isn't considered for a tiebreaker.
Click to expand...
Quit digging, dimwit. Rule of holes.
 
ericd7633 said:
The five highest conference champions automatically get selected. Do you understand that? Do you think the champion of the 6th best league will be deserving of a spot? Of course not, so this literally means nothing. Also, do you realize that there are only 4 power conferences now? It sure doesn't seem like it.
Click to expand...
Damn. I am stupid. I totally forgot while actively talking about their demise, that the Pac12 is dead. There are only 4 now :facepalm:. Which is, of course, the crux of what I was thinking -- 4 spots for 5 conferences. 1 champ will be left out, leaving them to fight for the 7 spots and a championship doesn't count as a tiebreaker.....But there aren't five. @WhosYourDawggy, my bad.....
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
I'm not sure how you guys don't understand this? 18 team conferences filled with massive teams will equal more losses. The G5 gets one of those auto-bids, and can compete for the other 4 spots. Conference championships functionally no longer being considered beyond those 5 spots is actually crazy. It means every single year 1 P5 champ will be competing with non-champs for a spot with the rest of the field, and the championship isn't considered for a tiebreaker.
Click to expand...

There are only 4 power conferences.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
going to take me a second to get used to this new world order.

I was sitting here like “what don’t they understand here? 4 spots for 5 P5s”

Le sigh.

Rip pac12.
Click to expand...
Thanks for letting us take over the B1G.

Try not to piss yourself Nov 2nd.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Damn. I am stupid. I totally forgot while actively talking about their demise, that the Pac12 is dead. There are only 4 now :facepalm:. Which is, of course, the crux of what I was thinking -- 4 spots for 5 conferences. 1 champ will be left out, leaving them to fight for the 7 spots and a championship doesn't count as a tiebreaker.....But there aren't five. @WhosYourDawggy, my bad.....
Click to expand...
You still don't totally get it. The 1 champ isn't left out. They just don't get a first round bye. Again, there is no tie that could use conference champs as a consideration. The top 5 conference champs get in automatically, with the top 4 getting first round byes.

Literally, the first paragraph of the article you posted:

The College Football Playoff will no longer use conference titles as a tiebreaker to determine its field given that the five highest-ranked conference winners will receive automatic bids into the 12-team tournament.
 
fishinabarrel said:
Slow your roll. You hadn't taken over the PAC and the B1G isn't going to be any easier
Click to expand...

Oregon has a longer winning streak vs. the B1G than they do the PAC.

It'll be nice for Oregon to cruise with an easier schedule.
 
osubuckeye89 said:
Yea i'm sure there's gonna be zero tears when Michigan goes like 8-4. There will be legions of excuses though.
Click to expand...
Did an OAM fan just make a comment about excuses, while all we have heard are excuses for the last couple years from OAM fans?!?!
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
Oregon has a longer winning streak vs. the B1G than they do the PAC.

It'll be nice for Oregon to cruise with an easier schedule.
Click to expand...
You realize that you should, in fact, have a longer winning streak against teams from a conference you were not in than the one you are now in, right? You simply stated the obvious. It's not a bragging point.
 
osubuckeye89 said:
Even if we did, who cares? That's how the game goes now, either play with it or fall behind. Michigan fans still sticking with their "WE PLAY SCHOOL NOT JUST FOOTBALL WE DONT DO THINGS LIKE THE SEC AND OHIO STATE!" schtick is comical and complete bullshit.
Click to expand...
I don't care -- I think it is hilarious that you went full on Texas A&M this year, so much so that you have major sports sites writing articles about OAM's $20+ million team. If it were the norm for teams to have $20+ million dollar payrolls for their CFB team -- it wouldn't be a story to write about. It will only make it that much more entertaining to beat you again though.

And Michigan definitely doesn't do things like the SEC and OAM in regards to NIL -- that's why you have had Michigan athletes come out and say as much. Even the money they raised to get players to stay for an extra year -- it didn't go to the only the top players, it was split between every player staying, including guys who wouldn't even see the field.

Michigan takes the same type of approach as Georgia in regards to NIL.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
You realize that you should, in fact, have a longer winning streak against teams from a conference you were not in than the one you are now in, right? You simply stated the obvious. It's not a bragging point.
Click to expand...
You have a 1-game losing streak against the SEC. When will the Dawgs turn it around?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top