More Michigan Cheating

fordman84 said:
That's your fault. If you had the video, you saw the video, then continuing to bitch about "screen grabs" like you were is just stupid.

But, stupid is your game.
Click to expand...
Ford….you’re being dumb. Because the video wasn’t important. 95% of the video is just stallions. We were talking about the blue light and recording. That was a second of the video clip, screenshot and spread on Twitter. Other photos of stallions had already well been circulated on the sideline. The new claim at the time was that he was recording with glasses.

The verbiage was irrelevant until Ralph spent the last year and a half suggesting I don’t know what a screenshot is.

You know. You accused me the other day of being contrarian and I can’t help but think maybe it’s you?
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Ford….you’re being dumb. Because the video wasn’t important. 95% of the video is just stallions. We were talking about the blue light and recording. That was a second of the video clip, screenshot and spread on Twitter. Other photos of stallions had already well been circulated on the sideline. The new claim at the time was that he was recording with glasses.

The verbiage was irrelevant until Ralph spent the last year and a half suggesting I don’t know what a screenshot is.

You know. You accused me the other day of being contrarian and I can’t help but think maybe it’s you?
Click to expand...
Want me to post the quotes again where you are obsessing over what is in the screengrab, not the definition of "screengrab"?
 
"der der you are in agreement with everyone else except for me so you are a contrarian".

Seriously, return your degree if you ever even got one.
 
fordman84 said:
Want me to post the quotes again where you are obsessing over what is in the screengrab, not the definition of "screengrab"?
Click to expand...
Because what was in the screen grab of the video was the important part…the blue light showing up on the glasses….is it really that complicated? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills here.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
All impermissible payments that would be legal today.
Click to expand...

Lol now this is just stupid.

They are not the same thing, there are definitely different scales of wrongdoing.

A actual pay to play scheme involving hundreds of thousands of dollars is quite a bit different than players trading their own belongings for tattoos.
 
fordman84 said:
"der der you are in agreement with everyone else except for me so you are a contrarian".

Seriously, return your degree if you ever even got one.
Click to expand...
No one else is arguing about this topic that you clearly don’t understand but you and Ralph. And I think Ralph is just doing it to be a dick.
 
9ierg8.jpg
 
Saying that Tatto gate and the Fab 5 pay to play are "the same thing" is like saying that someone stealing like booze from a liquor store is the "same thing" as someone robbing a bank.
 
cwerph said:
Before 1906, the forward pass was illegal, too.

So what?
Click to expand...

He's doing his schtick of taking 2 things that are way far off but maybe loosely related at best and saying they are "the same thing" because you could shoe horn them into the same broad category. He's a retard who doesn't believe there can be different degrees of things. It all has to be equal no matter what
 
osubuckeye89 said:
He's doing his schtick of taking 2 things that are way far off but maybe loosely related at best and saying they are "the same thing" because you could shoe horn them into the same broad category. He's a retard who doesn't believe there can be different degrees of things. It all has to be equal no matter what
Click to expand...
The fab five was worse. Both are stupid in the context of today. Better?
 
osubuckeye89 said:
He's doing his schtick of taking 2 things that are way far off but maybe loosely related at best and saying they are "the same thing" because you could shoe horn them into the same broad category. He's a retard who doesn't believe there can be different degrees of things. It all has to be equal no matter what
Click to expand...
He's trying desperately to change the conversation.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
I don't have a fucking issue, Ford. Ralph keeps bringing this up insinuating I don't know what a screenshot is. I defend myself saying I was talking about a screenshot of the video the entire time, as the conversation very clearly illustrates early on, and then he goes off. And now you're choosing to do the same. I have no issue. I know what a video vs. a screenshot is, if you tell me I don't because you don't understand the context of the fucking conversation, I'm going to tell you you're being stupid.

This isn't about what evidence towards the sign stealing is more valid. This is literally an accusation that keeps getting brought up by Ralph that I called his video a screenshot. And while yes, the single post he keeps quoting out of context is worded poorly, the entire thread at the time was me discussing a twitter post with a single screengrab of the video he posted.

It's fucking stupid. I'd be fine to stop any time.
Click to expand...

An accusation that keeps getting proven right.

Worded poorly?? LMFAO, you are a gift that keeps giving to the 300 club maize.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
The fab five was worse. Both are stupid in the context of today. Better?
Click to expand...
Better would have been shutting up 297 pages ago.

But you couldn't help it, and you still think that you can talk shit and then just point the conversation in a different direction. :dhd:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top