… and you’ve never heard me say that. I may have said the infractions appear minor, and ohio state was aware of of the alleged infractions (better than anyone on this site) … still they were unable to defeat Michigan in 2023 & 2024. That, sir, is a fact.
Exactly when was this cheating discovered, and exactly, what was Michigan doing?
If they were benefitting in any way from Stalions illegal scouting of future opponents scheme, then they were involved in cheating.
i.e. They were using the illegally obtained data to game prep against said opponents, and using it during the actual games against said opponents.
This is common sense stuff.
So basically “in-person scouting”, “recording the person signaling the players with a smartphone”, and “decoding simplistic signs”. Did I make any mistakes? Also, this thread started in October 2023, so it start then or before.
We know. You gave us the win in 2024. It was Stallions in 2021. It was fluke plays in 2022. It was McCord in 2023.
Valid point, but the signs are useless if you can’t decode them.
This is where you guys go off the rails. I have heard in-person scouting equated to sexual assault, robbing a bank and murder. Not all violations are equal. Stealing signs with in person scouting with a smartphone, is way different than stealing a playbook or electronic compromising of teams files.
Do you think ohio state had adequate time to defend against Michigan, by changing signs, changing what signs mean or having two people sending in signs - one as a dummy sign giver (and then switch back and forth). MLB and MiLB did this flawlessly. Even baseball went to electronic communication. This whole thing pushed the NCAA into the 21st Century.
I'll concede this point - well played, but as a counter signs given in baseball are much more complicated than than these teams were apparently given. Also, if two people sent in signs with only one of them being valid signs, it would stump the opponent who stole the signs. Again, I use baseball as my counterpoint.
Some violations are more serious than others. If you like like I can go with an off the charts example like if one of our coaches killed a star player with a Butcher Knife in from of the team and everyone kept silent. Also, attorneys commonly plea bargain charges because somethings are different than others.
It was pretty common for my high school team to meet several times a week.
No, he means THE OUT HOUSE!!!
I'm pretty certain I don't need you translating for me. THE BIG HOUSE.
Well we know option one can’t be true since we have physical video (not a screen grab
) evidence of ole Stallions on the sidelines with a pair of recording sunglasses during night in a game not including his employer but an opponent of his employer.
Is this similar to Adam Schiff saying “There is evidence in plain sight”. Evidence they tell us they have, but have not produced is inadmissible.Well we know option one can’t be true since we have physical video (not a screen grab
Option 2 certainly could be plausible but it’s not the only other option. Also the authoritative body doesn’t really have teeth anymore, so there’s that.
