More Michigan Cheating

[TheReal_NU]

I'll believe everything when this this whole thing is resolved ... like everyone else on this thread, I know nothing!!! But, let's try for 10,000 replies before it is resolved.

Fuck Iowa.

Just trying to help get 10k

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Distract much?

That Michigan hasn't leaked anything from the meeting tells me nothing came out of the meeting that favored Michigan.

There’s no decision that happens at the meeting. Both sides make an argument to the 3rd part committee. Then it ends. Then the committee takes 30-90 days (says the ncaa prez) to deliberate. There wouldn’t be anything to leak.

 

[Red_Alert]

There’s no decision that happens at the meeting. Both sides make an argument to the 3rd part committee. Then it ends. Then the committee takes 30-90 days (says the ncaa prez) to deliberate. There wouldn’t be anything to leak.

No shit Sherlock.

The NCAA's argument obviously has Michigan tinkling in their tighty whities.

Otherwise they'd be leaking like they did after receiving the NOA.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

No shit Sherlock.

The NCAA's argument obviously has Michigan tinkling in their tighty whities.

Otherwise they'd be leaking like they did after receiving the NOA.

The ncaa and Michigans argument likely remains unchanged. That’s all this means. We know what both are.

 

[Red_Alert]

"tHeRe'S nO DeCiSiOn ThAt hAppEnS aT TeH MeeTiNg sO oBviOusLy MiCHiGaN DiD nOtHiNg WrOnG" - maze&blew

 

[Red_Alert]

The ncaa and Michigans argument likely remains unchanged. That’s all this means. We know what both are.

LMFAO

FFS

The NOA contained exactly was it says "Allegations".
The NOA did not tell Michigan what evidence they had to support said 'Allegations'.

The NCAA's evidence was presented at the meeting.
If they had no evidence, or if said evidence was weak, then Michigan would have leaked it by now.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

LMFAO

FFS

The NOA contained exactly was it says "Allegations".
The NOA did not tell Michigan what evidence they had to support said 'Allegations'.

The NCAA's evidence was presented at the meeting.
If they had no evidence, or if said evidence was weak, then Michigan would have leaked it by now.

Yes. It does. You dummy.

 

[Red_Alert]

Yes. It does. You dummy.

What does what?

 

[NewPhoneWhoDis]

No shit Sherlock.

The NCAA's argument obviously has Michigan tinkling in their tighty whities.

Otherwise they'd be leaking like they did after receiving the NOA.

You are still wasting your time on this. What could possibly be leaked? There are no decisions made during the 2 day meeting. The two sides make their case and then they have 27 years to make a decision, because it is the NCAA and everything happens in slow motion. So we will have a decision on this some time in 2050.

 

[Red_Alert]

You are still wasting your time on this. What could possibly be leaked? There are no decisions made during the 2 day meeting. The two sides make their case and then they have 27 years to make a decision, because it is the NCAA and everything happens in slow motion. So we will have a decision on this some time in 2050.

LOL

We ALL know that. Tell us something we don't know.

Michigan has been leaking since the beginning in attempt to establish an innocence narrative.
Michigan selectively leaked from the NOA to establish a narrative.
We have not seen the entire NOA.

The NOA is simply 'allegations'.
The evidence the NCAA gathers is not in the NOA. The evidence was presented at the meeting.
That Michigan hasn't leaked the evidence presented at the meeting means it can't be good for Michigan.