Most Deserving Champions Ever - Ohio State Buckeyes 2024

Across The Field said:
It's still not even true.
Click to expand...
Maybe not, but still much more plausible than the typo version which is easily disproven by tOSU doing it in just the last two games.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
You're doing that no matter what. Do we all really think SMU or Boise were better teams than Alabama this year?
Click to expand...

I mean Alabama lost to fucking Vanderbilt and Oklahoma, so they could very well lose to SMU or Boise. Let's not act like Bama was some great team who just ran into a SEC brick wall
 
osubuckeye89 said:
I mean Alabama lost to fucking Vanderbilt and Oklahoma, so they could very well lose to SMU or Boise. Let's not act like Bama was some great team who just ran into a SEC brick wall
Click to expand...
Yeah but tOSU lost to fucking Oregon, so clearly not some great team :evil:
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
The BCS was the best system. Oregon vs. Georgia would have been a great game. 4 team playoff is fine. A 12 team playoff where some teams that don't deserve it get a bye, while others get a Boise State, SMU path, is fucking stupid.
Click to expand...

The BCS system where a computer ranked teams based on "experts" polls and "strength of schedule" and only the top 2 teams mattered. That was a trash system, and it didn't even definitively decide the #1. In 2003, LSU, OU, and USC all had just one loss, but USC didn't get to play in the natty...and they were probably the best team of the bunch.

But, at least it started us down the path to a true playoff, which is what the sport always needed.
 
fordman84 said:
Dude, the Universe will never let A&M win a natty because of how hard I'd go. I'd give posting bans to every last fucker here and just go full stream-of-conscious posting by myself for a full 24 hours. Probably stroke out or give myself an aneurysm.
Click to expand...

You too?
 
Tharvot said:
The BCS system where a computer ranked teams based on "experts" polls and "strength of schedule" and only the top 2 teams mattered. That was a trash system, and it didn't even definitively decide the #1. In 2003, LSU, OU, and USC all had just one loss, but USC didn't get to play in the natty...and they were probably the best team of the bunch.

But, at least it started us down the path to a true playoff, which is what the sport always needed.
Click to expand...

A playoff is way better than the BCS and way better than what we had before the BCS where writers and coaches would just vote for the champion. The perfect # of teams is debatable but anyone who actually thinks the BCS was the ticket is full of shit.
 
cwerph said:
The OSU season ended last night. Sorry (not sorry) yours ended so soon.
Click to expand...
Last night was the last game of the season for Notre Dame and Ohio State, but not for the overwhelming majority of teams. Don't you believe in democracy?
 
Tharvot said:
The BCS system where a computer ranked teams based on "experts" polls and "strength of schedule" and only the top 2 teams mattered. That was a trash system, and it didn't even definitively decide the #1. In 2003, LSU, OU, and USC all had just one loss, but USC didn't get to play in the natty...and they were probably the best team of the bunch.

But, at least it started us down the path to a true playoff, which is what the sport always needed.
Click to expand...
Right, and it was the better system. This current system is a bad one. Giving teams a second shot at other teams is not what CFB is about. Ohio State shouldn't get a second shot at Oregon. Just like Alabama and Georgia shouldn't get a do-over in the 4 team playoff. I hate that.

The best team this year was Oregon. Ohio State shouldn't have been given a gimmy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top