Going off your earlier posts, you seem to believe there is a fair sized gap in coaching between the two teams. So in order to reach 50/50 you are then saying you make up for it either in talent or pure execution.
On any given day the 'best' team doesn't always win. This is really the only reason most of us watch games other than our own teams. So even if you sum up that Bama has an edge, of course Georgia can still win.
The point was that in that scenario, it would be Bama playing at some level below their ability that aided a Georgia win. It's not that Georgia isn't one of the top teams in the game and is stacked with talent. When you add coaching decisions, adjustments, and their talent, it's hard not to pick them at something more than 50% vs Georgia.
Now that's from an outside observer to be sure.