GAME Oregon vs USC for the PAC-12 Championship

Shanemansj13 said:
So they are still famous? Famous at what exactly?

Not winning the PAC? Check.
Not winning the big games? Check.
Not even making it to the CFP? Check.
Not winning Nattys? Check.

They had one CFP win and got stomped in the title game. Other than they just have their sparkly uni’s.

#irrelevant
Click to expand...
Oregon has won more PAC Championships in past 15 years than any other school - check
Oregon has won more Rose Bowls in past 10 years than any other school - check
Oregon has made the CFP? Still hold largest route in playoff history - check
Yep - No Natty’s - check
Winning in Columbus - check
Stickers on helmets like Pop Warner teams? No check
 
OregonDucks said:
Umm no deal. Because of Oregon mostly playing in the rose bowl and playoff I am unsure if there are contracts in which a higher bowl within the PAC is obligated to take the 3rd place pac team record. So uw may get a bigger bowl due to contractual agreements but also maybe not.

If the bowls had their choice they’d take Oregon. Also I don’t know these days of the mid tier bowls which is considered the better ones. I grew up with the holiday bowl as #2 behind the Rose but I think within the last few years somehow the Alamo bowl is considered the highest non NY6 bowl for the PAC?

Personal opinion if we aren’t going to a NY6 bowl or playoff give me Vegas, Bahamas or Hawaii bowl. Destination game.
Click to expand...
So you make the claim and now backtrack when tasked to make a bet on it. Totally on brand. FTR there is no set order.

“The Alamo, Holiday, and Las Vegas bowls have some flexibility — they can pass on Team X in favor of Team Y as long as there is no more than a one-game difference in conference record. The Sun and LA bowls must base their selections on order-of-finish.”
Click to expand...
 
OregonDucks said:
So which is technically considered then better bowl?
Click to expand...

Pac-12​

Eligible teams: No. 4 USC (11-1, top seed); No. 11 Utah (9-3, second seed); No. 12 Washington (10-2); No. 15 Oregon State (9-3); No. 16 Oregon (9-3); No. 17 UCLA (9-3); Washington State (7-5).

Primary bowl tie-ins: Rose (champion or highest-ranked non-Playoff qualifier); Alamo (second); Vegas (third); Holiday (fourth); Sun (fifth); LA Bowl (sixth). Secondary agreements with the Armed Forces, First Responder and Gasparilla.

Selection process: Selection committee chooses teams for Playoff. If the Pac-12 champion qualifies for the CFP, the Rose has the flexibility to choose either the highest-ranked non-champion or between teams already qualifying for New Year’s Six bowls.
Click to expand...
 
Do you even google?
 
Wizardhawk said:
Do you even google?
Click to expand...
You can go by Bowl payouts also. Alamo Bowl is higher than the Holiday Bowl. Huskies are higher ranked and will go to higher ranked/payout Bowl.
 
OregonDucks said:
Umm no deal. Because of Oregon mostly playing in the rose bowl and playoff I am unsure if there are contracts in which a higher bowl within the PAC is obligated to take the 3rd place pac team record. So uw may get a bigger bowl due to contractual agreements but also maybe not.

If the bowls had their choice they’d take Oregon. Also I don’t know these days of the mid tier bowls which is considered the better ones. I grew up with the holiday bowl as #2 behind the Rose but I think within the last few years somehow the Alamo bowl is considered the highest non NY6 bowl for the PAC?

Personal opinion if we aren’t going to a NY6 bowl or playoff give me Vegas, Bahamas or Hawaii bowl. Destination game.
Click to expand...
All I read was "blah blah blah, I'm a little bitch and I know I'm full of shit."

Get fucked.
 
UbetterDUCK said:
You can go by Bowl payouts also. Alamo Bowl is higher than the Holiday Bowl. Huskies are higher ranked and will go to higher ranked/payout Bowl.
Click to expand...
I think those were the order in which they get to select. Either way, I'm sure it will be reported on which teams got picked over others. It can be verified.

I doubt UW goes to a 6 so it should be a level bet.
 
DayButtAssMans’s said:
All I read was "blah blah blah, I'm a little bitch and I know I'm full of shit."

Get fucked.
Click to expand...
He didn't believe any of the following when he said it. Just more of his empty bloviating.
OregonDucks said:
Nothing funny about it and you likely won't be laughing when a bigger bowl fights to get Oregon and skips uw.
Click to expand...

OregonDucks said:
Utah to the Rose
USC will get the NY6 bowl invite.

Washington is already an afterthought to many. Whichever is the "better" bowl, Alamo or Holiday, the better bowl will want Oregon.
Click to expand...
 
one thing is for sure. @OregonDucks is a little bitch and just admitted even he knows he’s 100% full of shit. You just acknowledged UW>oregon in 2022 @OregonDucks. Not that you needed to after we beat you in Autzen. But it’s nice to see you acknowledge it anyway.

You little bitch.
 
As a whole four teams that are in the Pac 12 should be in the top 10.

UW
Oregon
USC
Utah

What other conference has a third of their respective conference in the top ten?
 
OregonDucks said:
Also I don’t know these days of the mid tier bowls which is considered the better ones. I grew up with the holiday bowl as #2 behind the Rose but I think within the last few years somehow the Alamo bowl is considered the highest non NY6 bowl for the PAC?

Personal opinion if we aren’t going to a NY6 bowl or playoff give me Vegas, Bahamas or Hawaii bowl. Destination game.
Click to expand...

OregonDucks said:
So which is technically considered then better bowl?
Click to expand...
also, all terms that could have been set. And no one thinks the holiday bowl is #2 anymore, you absolute dumbass. It’s not hard. Google the Pac 12 bowls.

Fuck yourself. And enjoy the Vegas bowl. Pussy.
 
Could you imagine talking so much bullshit that you won't even take a simple bet to back up the shit you say?

@OregonDucks
 
Top to Bottom I think the PAC 12 have some of the best teams but since they play each other their records are going to result in less than desirable records that don't get them ranked as well as they should.
 
Fog said:
Top to Bottom I think the PAC 12 have some of the best teams but since they play each other their records are going to result in less than desirable records that don't get them ranked as well as they should.
Click to expand...
Nah, the Pac has some of the most solid across the board good teams, but none of them match up with the great teams.
 
Fog said:
Top to Bottom I think the PAC 12 have some of the best teams but since they play each other their records are going to result in less than desirable records that don't get them ranked as well as they should.
Click to expand...
They have a cluster of good teams, but no great teams. That's the problem. It isn't a 'garbage' conference, but there are no real threats to winning a national title either, nor even being seriously competitive against the top 4-6 schools in the country.
 
Sorry I don’t trust a bunch of old guys in suits making a decision in a room full of poinsettias
 
DayButtAssMans’s said:
Nah, the Pac has some of the most solid across the board good teams, but none of them match up with the great teams.
Click to expand...
Yeah but those great teams have duds in their respective conferences that help with their records that make them look great...just saying
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top