Tennessee or Nebraska?

Which team returns to being a legit contender first?

  • Tennessee

    Votes: 19 63.3%

  • Nebraska

    Votes: 8 26.7%

  • Amish Potato Salad

    Votes: 3 10.0%
  • Total voters
    30
"I couldn't care less about Osborne, but I'm gonna reference him and 1997 four posts in a row." NewPhoneWhoDis (a.k.a. TrustMeIAmRight)

LMAO!!
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
Well, you will always have the 00's.... and by that, I mean that 1900's.
Click to expand...
The difference between UM and Nebraska.......UM has a slight chance to win another title. Nebraska has no chance. (Unless they physically move the entire university out of the state and into one that actually has high school football)
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
The difference between UM and Nebraska.......UM has a slight chance to win another title. Nebraska has no chance. (Unless they physically move the entire university out of the state and into one that actually has high school football)
Click to expand...
How do you figure?

Michigan sure does have a track record of winning titles outside of the pre 1920's. LMAO
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
How do you figure?

Michigan sure does have a track record of winning titles outside of the pre 1920's. LMAO
Click to expand...
Nebraska's recruiting makes Michigan's recruiting look like Georgia and Bama.
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
Nebraska's recruiting makes Michigan's recruiting look like Georgia and Bama.
Click to expand...

LOL. What a fucking dumbass thing to say.

Nebraska recruiting makes only Georgia and Bama's recruiting "look like Georgia and Bama".

Not to mention Michigan needed a Martinez fumble with 1:24 remaining to beat Nebraska by 3 points.

1647562617032.png
 
Red_Alert said:
LOL. What a fucking dumbass thing to say.

Nebraska recruiting makes only Georgia and Bama's recruiting "look like Georgia and Bama".

Not to mention Michigan needed a Martinez fumble with 1:24 remaining to beat Nebraska by 3 points.

View attachment 65152
Click to expand...
Uhhhhhh, congrats on the loss?

You've signed ONE five star recruit since 2000 from outside the state of Nebraska. ONE in 22 years. But yeah -- Nebraska will be nationally elite again :facepalm:

You guys have signed a whopping 3 top 100 recruits in the last 4 years and one transferred out, my guess is because he wanted to win games.

Nebraska is RIGHT THERE. If they get the right coach -- look out. They may be able to compete with Wisconsin.
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
Nebraska's recruiting makes Michigan's recruiting look like Georgia and Bama.
Click to expand...
If that's the case.... and we are 2-3 against Michigan since joining... then it looks like we can still compete for titles.
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
If that's the case.... and we are 2-3 against Michigan since joining... then it looks like we can still compete for titles.
Click to expand...
Congrats on the losing record? At 1-9 against Wisconsin -- I think you need to put your focus elsewhere. But you guys are right there -- just need to find the right coach.
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
Congrats on the losing record? At 1-9 against Wisconsin -- I think you need to put your focus elsewhere. But you guys are right there -- just need to find the right coach.
Click to expand...
Point was that you said Michigan could compete for a title here and there. You also said you recruit like Bama compared to us.... well, we've beaten you a couple times. So if you're so smaht, then by your own analogy, we could compete for a title here and there.

And if you recruit like Bama, it must be quite embarrassing losing to a team that can't recruit like that, you know, because of all the 'no recruits in surrounding area' reason.... but I bet nothing is as embarrassing as losing to an FCS school at home when you are the #5 team in the country and favored by 33 points. We wouldn't know anything about that.
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
Point was that you said Michigan could compete for a title here and there. You also said you recruit like Bama compared to us.... well, we've beaten you a couple times. So if you're so smaht, then by your own analogy, we could compete for a title here and there.

And if you recruit like Bama, it must be quite embarrassing losing to a team that can't recruit like that, you know, because of all the 'no recruits in surrounding area' reason.... but I bet nothing is as embarrassing as losing to an FCS school at home when you are the #5 team in the country and favored by 33 points. We wouldn't know anything about that.
Click to expand...
Nebraska could compete for a national title again some time. All they have to do is move the entire campus to a state in the South, establish a fan base in the area -- wait for those fans to have kids who grow up. Then hope those kids are become elite recruits and Nebraska can sign them. Shouldn't take more than 20-25 years.

So start petitioning the school to move, then Nebraska has a chance to be elite again.
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
Nebraska could compete for a national title again some time. All they have to do is move the entire campus to a state in the South, establish a fan base in the area -- wait for those fans to have kids who grow up. Then hope those kids are become elite recruits and Nebraska can sign them. Shouldn't take more than 20-25 years.

So start petitioning the school to move, then Nebraska has a chance to be elite again.
Click to expand...
nah, we beat you as is... so according to your analogy, the only difference is coaching.
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
Point was that you said Michigan could compete for a title here and there. You also said you recruit like Bama compared to us.... well, we've beaten you a couple times. So if you're so smaht, then by your own analogy, we could compete for a title here and there.

And if you recruit like Bama, it must be quite embarrassing losing to a team that can't recruit like that, you know, because of all the 'no recruits in surrounding area' reason.... but I bet nothing is as embarrassing as losing to an FCS school at home when you are the #5 team in the country and favored by 33 points. We wouldn't know anything about that.
Click to expand...
You've won 15 games total in FOUR YEARS. Not sure you want to talk about embarrassing.
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
nah, we beat you as is... so according to your analogy, the only difference is coaching.
Click to expand...
Well -- if Michigan hires back Brady Hoke -- you definitely have a shot, since he was the coach the last time Nebraska beat UM. You should hurry up and hire back Bo Pelini too, I believe he was your coach.

In other words -- start the petition to get Nebraska to move out of the state. You have a better shot with that idea.
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
Well -- if Michigan hires back Brady Hoke -- you definitely have a shot, since he was the coach the last time Nebraska beat UM. You should hurry up and hire back Bo Pelini too, I believe he was your coach.

In other words -- start the petition to get Nebraska to move out of the state. You have a better shot with that idea.
Click to expand...
Don't need to, you are proving that the only difference is the coaching. The very thing you have been arguing against the whole time.
 
NewPhoneWhoDis said:
Uhhhhhh, congrats on the loss?

You've signed ONE five star recruit since 2000 from outside the state of Nebraska. ONE in 22 years. But yeah -- Nebraska will be nationally elite again :facepalm:

You guys have signed a whopping 3 top 100 recruits in the last 4 years and one transferred out, my guess is because he wanted to win games.

Nebraska is RIGHT THERE. If they get the right coach -- look out. They may be able to compete with Wisconsin.
Click to expand...

HA!!

Easy to reel your dumbass back into ad nauseam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top