- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 42,436
- Reaction score
- 51,152
- Bookie:
- $ 10,650.00




It’s all about location. Midwest kids just aren’t good at football and can’t keep up with players from the south.Yeah. Conferences win natties.
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s all about location. Midwest kids just aren’t good at football and can’t keep up with players from the south.Yeah. Conferences win natties.
![]()
SEC just needs to let the B1G have Mizzou, A&M, Texas and Oklahoma.
SEC would have the best viewing product and still win the football natty every year
Stir, stir, stir.SEC just needs to let the B1G have Mizzou, A&M, Texas and Oklahoma.
SEC would have the best viewing product and still win the football natty every year
I got pretty much the same realignment.I can come up with homes for the remaining PAC teams, as well as a majority of the ACC. I don't see anyone wanting Boston College and maybe even Syracuse.
22 teams in each could mean 11 team divisions. Play 1 game OOC.
BIG: 22 teams
Cal
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Michigan St
Minnesota
Nebraska
Northwestern
North Carolina
Ohio St
Oregon
Penn St
Purdue
Rutgers
Stanford
UCLA
USC
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Big 12: 22 teams
Arizona
Arizona St
BYU
Baylor
Cincinnati
Colorado
Georgia Tech
Houston
Iowa St
Kansas
Kansas St
Louisville
Oklahoma St
Oregon St
Pittsburgh
TCU
Texas Tech
UCF
Utah
Wake Forest
Washington St
West Virginia
SEC: 22 teams
Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
Clemson
Duke
Florida
Florida State
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Miami
Mississippi St
Missouri
NC State
Oklahoma
Ole Miss
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Texas A&M
Vanderbilt
Virginia Tech
You actually defending that "conferences win natties" statement?It’s all about location. Midwest kids just aren’t good at football and can’t keep up with players from the south.
When one conference is responsible for like 7/8 of all natties this century, there’s something to itYou actually defending that "conferences win natties" statement?
The "conference" had nothing to do with it. Correlation is not causation.When one conference is responsible for like 7/8 of all natties this century, there’s something to it
I think Syracuse is definitely the better get over Oregon State, their basketball tradition alone gets them in over the Beavers, not to mention having a footprint in the state of NY and another eastern time zone program. SU and WVU also have a trophy game in football that could be marketed.I can come up with homes for the remaining PAC teams, as well as a majority of the ACC. I don't see anyone wanting Boston College and maybe even Syracuse.
Big 12: 22 teams
Arizona
Arizona St
BYU
Baylor
Cincinnati
Colorado
Georgia Tech
Houston
Iowa St
Kansas
Kansas St
Louisville
Oklahoma St
Oregon St
Pittsburgh
TCU
Texas Tech
UCF
Utah
Wake Forest
Washington St
West Virginia
Filling a schedule won't be an issue. Filling it with top programs may become an issue with these new mega conferences. I'd guess with the addition of these new schools to the SEC and B1G, it will add one or two extra high profile matchups to their schedules a year.ND will have no issue filling a schedule.
ND will never have an issue filling it’s schedule with top programs.Filling a schedule won't be an issue. Filling it with top programs may become an issue with these new mega conferences. I'd guess with the addition of these new schools to the SEC and B1G, it will add one or two extra high profile matchups to their schedules a year.
The need to schedule big OOC matchups to boost your strength of schedule will go out the window for teams in those conferences.
Yep. Any of the top 6-8 B1G schools would do home and home in a heartbeat.ND will never have an issue filling it’s schedule with top programs.
Shots fired! Dead center bullseye but still... fired.It’s all about location. Midwest kids just aren’t good at football and can’t keep up with players from the south.
Wake Forest is a Southern conference type of school that was fortunate to have close enough ties to Duke, UNC and NCSU back in the 1950s so they became a founding member of the ACC. They aren't going to the Big 12.I can come up with homes for the remaining PAC teams, as well as a majority of the ACC. I don't see anyone wanting Boston College and maybe even Syracuse.
22 teams in each could mean 11 team divisions. Play 1 game OOC.
BIG: 22 teams
Cal
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Michigan St
Minnesota
Nebraska
Northwestern
North Carolina
Ohio St
Oregon
Penn St
Purdue
Rutgers
Stanford
UCLA
USC
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Big 12: 22 teams
Arizona
Arizona St
BYU
Baylor
Cincinnati
Colorado
Georgia Tech
Houston
Iowa St
Kansas
Kansas St
Louisville
Oklahoma St
Oregon St
Pittsburgh
TCU
Texas Tech
UCF
Utah
Wake Forest
Washington St
West Virginia
SEC: 22 teams
Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
Clemson
Duke
Florida
Florida State
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Miami
Mississippi St
Missouri
NC State
Oklahoma
Ole Miss
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Texas A&M
Vanderbilt
Virginia Tech
problem for the SEC, is that the Big Ten will want those schools too. in a bidding war, the Big Ten will win over the SEC.Don’t want Miami, NC State or Vt.
The SEC selects instead UNC, Virginia and ND.
Truly clown world we are living in when Stanford and Tulane reside in the same conference.different rumors of full MWC and Pac 4. PAC 4 and some AAC and some MWC. if the first happens no big movements. if the second happens another domino chain falls.
If i were guessing I would say
Pac west
WSU, OSU, CAL, Stanford, SDSU, Fresno
Pac East
Boise, Colorado State, Wyoming, SMU, Tulane, Memphis (possible UTSA or Tulsa. but id guess 3 teams total from AAC)
AAC could stand at 11 or look to add 1 or 3 for even numbers but not sure those teams exist for them. not sure anyone in Sun Belt is looking to jump. CUSA teams probably arent moving the needle.
7 MWC teams stick together and either invite some CUSA teams like UTEP and or NMSU. but also could look at FCS Montana and Dakota schools.
i mean i feel the same with Oregon and Maryland and Arizona and UCF but those happened tooTruly clown world we are living in when Stanford and Tulane reside in the same conference.
MWC makes 4 million per team a year with a 30mm buyout per team.different rumors of full MWC and Pac 4. PAC 4 and some AAC and some MWC. if the first happens no big movements. if the second happens another domino chain falls.
If i were guessing I would say
Pac west
WSU, OSU, CAL, Stanford, SDSU, Fresno
Pac East
Boise, Colorado State, Wyoming, SMU, Tulane, Memphis (possible UTSA or Tulsa. but id guess 3 teams total from AAC)
AAC could stand at 11 or look to add 1 or 3 for even numbers but not sure those teams exist for them. not sure anyone in Sun Belt is looking to jump. CUSA teams probably arent moving the needle.
7 MWC teams stick together and either invite some CUSA teams like UTEP and or NMSU. but also could look at FCS Montana and Dakota schools.
unless they re did their clauses i dont think the AAC is that muchMWC makes 4 million per team a year with a 30mm buyout per team.
Looks like the AAC makes 7 million and the buyout is 30 million as well but it's convoluted because its 10mm exit and 27 months notice but people who know more than I do are saying the cost would be 30 million based on what UCONN paid to get out.
A PAC deal with Oregon and Washington was only worth 20 million a team so no way what you are proposing is worth more than 10mm per team.
The math doesn't work unless teams don't have to pay buyouts.