- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00

The P12 wasn't good this year though after the top 3 teams. And it's not like the P12 had a good tournament this year either, two teams underperformed, and one performed according to seed line. MWC had a bad tournament, no doubt, but all the teams should have made it, IMO. When CU and Oregon finish 4/5 in a P5/6 conference, the depth of the league isn't good. Heck the MWC had a better winning % in OOC play than the P12 did this year. Which is saying something because the bottom of the MWC is gross. Lol.
I appreciate that at least you believe these MWC teams are good. Most people will agree they wouldn’t be able to perform in power conferences and still argue they deserve an at large bid. You’re wrong about the MWC being better than the PAC but at least you really believe it.
Despite the PAC underperforming, those 4 win tournaments wins are more than the MWC has had since 2015. This shouldn’t be a shock. Most players play in the MWC because they weren’t recruited by PAC 12 schools or transfer there from PAC 12 schools because they weren’t happy with their playing time.
If we are going to argue the MWC is better than the PAC, let’s hold them to the same standard