We are not alone. They are here!

SU Nittany Tide said:
It's possible they'd want to harvest us I suppose. There is a shitload of water and minerals elsewhere though. There is a vapor cloud out there with many galaxies worth of water.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I don’t know what specific resources we have that are rare.

Gold always is discussed. But all the known gold on earth only fills two swimming pools. There’s no way we’ve corned the Galatic market on it.
 
Peter Gozintite said:
It has been rare in our human history, for a lifeform with advanced tools and weaponry, did not treat others very well during their advancements. It would appear to me that if they are extremely advanced, regardless of the numbers, we probably are totally fucked.
Click to expand...
As long as we have Jeff Goldblum we have a chance.
 
Bayou Tiger said:

US has secret evidence of UFOs breaking sound barrier without a sonic boom and performing moves humans don't have the technology for, Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe reveals ahead of bombshell real X Files report​

  • In December a 180-day deadline was announced for a report into UFO sightings
  • The Pentagon and intelligence agencies must release their report by June 1
  • John Ratcliffe, former DNI, said there were more sightings than publicly known
  • Ratcliffe said the observations were made by Navy and Air Force pilots
  • They were recorded by 'multiple sensors' and had no obvious explanation
  • The incidents included supersonic travel without a sonic boom
  • Ratcliffe said it was in the public interest that the information be released
40761020-9387129-image-a-3_1616374072600.jpg


The U.S. has evidence of UFOs breaking the sound barrier without a sonic boom and making maneuvers impossible with known technology, the former Director of National Intelligence has revealed.

The revelations increased excitement about a forthcoming report detailing what the U.S. government has observed.

John Ratcliffe, who served as Donald Trump's Director of National Intelligence, said that many of the incidents still have no easy explanation.

'There are a lot more sightings than have been made public,' Ratcliffe told Fox News.

'Some of those have been declassified.

'And when we talk about sightings, we are talking about objects that have seen by Navy or Air Force pilots, or have been picked up by satellite imagery that frankly engage in actions that are difficult to explain.

'Movements that are hard to replicate that we don't have the technology for. Or traveling at speeds that exceed the sound barrier without a sonic boom.'


www.dailymail.co.uk

US has evidence of UFOs breaking sound barrier without a sonic boom

The Pentagon and intelligence agencies were in December given a 180-day deadline to produce a report into UFO sightings, meaning it will be released by June 1.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...

I'm anxiously awaiting the report. People also need to read and understand technology just a little more.

"To understand the videos, all you need to do is ask any fighter pilot familiar with the FLIR camera system," Brian Dunning, a professional scientific skeptic and podcaster, told Salon by email. "What looks like great speed and wild maneuvers is just a common optical illusion combined with the effects of the FLIR's gimbal and glare filter." FLIR cameras, short for forward-looking infrared cameras, are capable of seeing slightly into the infrared spectrum, meaning that heat sources light up on FLIR camera footage.

Dunning zeroed in on a released video that appears to show a bat-winged shaped craft, noting that "the object you're seeing is a single point of heat from an unidentified plane, probably a distant commercial jet, flying away from the F-18. The camera is looking out the side of the F-18 which is speeding past nearby clouds, making the object appear to be moving relative to the clouds."

He added, "Its bat-wing shape is how the FLIR's glare filter always depicts single bright points (there are plenty of examples of this on YouTube), and whenever the object appears to turn, this is simply the FLIRs gimbal rotating to keep the target in view as the F-18 maneuvers. The other videos also have similarly prosaic explanations."

Skeptics say there are rational explanations for UFO sighting videos
 
jvett77 said:
I'm anxiously awaiting the report. People also need to read and understand technology just a little more.
"To understand the videos, all you need to do is ask any fighter pilot familiar with the FLIR camera system," Brian Dunning, a professional scientific skeptic and podcaster, told Salon by email. "What looks like great speed and wild maneuvers is just a common optical illusion combined with the effects of the FLIR's gimbal and glare filter." FLIR cameras, short for forward-looking infrared cameras, are capable of seeing slightly into the infrared spectrum, meaning that heat sources light up on FLIR camera footage.

Dunning zeroed in on a released video that appears to show a bat-winged shaped craft, noting that "the object you're seeing is a single point of heat from an unidentified plane, probably a distant commercial jet, flying away from the F-18. The camera is looking out the side of the F-18 which is speeding past nearby clouds, making the object appear to be moving relative to the clouds."

He added, "Its bat-wing shape is how the FLIR's glare filter always depicts single bright points (there are plenty of examples of this on YouTube), and whenever the object appears to turn, this is simply the FLIRs gimbal rotating to keep the target in view as the F-18 maneuvers. The other videos also have similarly prosaic explanations."

Skeptics say there are rational explanations for UFO sighting videos
Click to expand...


From the article you linked....


Alexander Wendt, an international relations professor at Ohio State University who has become a prominent amateur ufologist, pointed to the reactions of the military pilots as a sign that these new UFOs should be taken seriously.

"I challenge anybody to do better than the Navy to explain what's in those videos. If the Navy couldn't do it..." Wendt told Salon, before adding that "they had every reason to want this off their plate."

As Wendt pointed out, "I think what's unique about these Navy videos is that the whole issue arose from the pilots... I think the upset pilots is really a key thing. These guys are the experts on what's in the sky. They have thousands of hours of experience flying up there. You see some of the interviews with these pilots and they think something is going on, and they were the ones that pushed this whole issue to the front."
 
That's the thing....the Navy didn't come forward with this info to educate the public. Navy pilots, who say they have seen these things with their own eyes, are the reason you are even hearing about it.

2004...that's when that "tic-tac" object was filmed. That was over 16 years ago. The Navy had denied it's authenticity for that long. The only reason you got to see the video is a pilot leaked it! The Navy knows more about these things than they are saying...and why? Who the fuck put them in charge?
 
Bayou Tiger said:
That's the thing....the Navy didn't come forward with this info to educate the public. Navy pilots, who say they have seen these things with their own eyes, are the reason you are even hearing about it.

2004...that's when that "tic-tac" object was filmed. That was over 16 years ago. The Navy had denied it's authenticity for that long. The only reason you got to see the video is a pilot leaked it! The Navy knows more about these things than they are saying...and why? Who the fuck put them in charge?
Click to expand...
You ever read up on Dorothy Izatt's story?
 
Bayou Tiger said:
That's the thing....the Navy didn't come forward with this info to educate the public. Navy pilots, who say they have seen these things with their own eyes, are the reason you are even hearing about it.

2004...that's when that "tic-tac" object was filmed. That was over 16 years ago. The Navy had denied it's authenticity for that long. The only reason you got to see the video is a pilot leaked it! The Navy knows more about these things than they are saying...and why? Who the fuck put them in charge?
Click to expand...

The military prefers not to discuss the limitations of their IR systems and their anomalies because they know that an enemy can work around those limitations and take advantage of detection systems to thwart them. Pilots are obviously intelligent but many do not have the scientific knowledge about how and why they can be deceived by software malfunction/anomaly/artifacts, human observational illusion (e.g., parallax), or interpretive error associated with advanced IR systems. Pilots did not actually see the object, it was recorded on video.

Every year there are dozens or hundreds of "UFO" sightings and most can be explained by basic investigation and also the simple fact that it's unlikely that we are being invaded by hundreds of alien objects. We'll see what the report says.
 
SU Nittany Tide said:
There are plenty of resources out there. I don't know that killing us all for earth's stuff would be worth it. Unless they just enjoyed that sort of thing..
Click to expand...

Agree. If they can get from the Pleiades to here in the blink of an eye, they can harvest whatever they need from whatever planet, asteroid or comet they feel like.

Unless they are here: To Serve Man

1616863383425.png
 
jvett77 said:
Pilots did not actually see the object, it was recorded on video.
Click to expand...

How did they then see it enter the water and then come out the water?

You don't know the whole story do you?
 
jvett77 said:
They get more amazing year by year. Look up Fata Morgana. The eyes play trick on us all the time.

View attachment 25135

Fata Morgana (mirage) - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

Well no longer are you claiming it's something with "flir" now it's a mirage? Next you'll claim its swamp gas huh?


Experienced pilots, men of impeccable character, have claimed to have seen these objects with their own eyes.

The military, in secret, has been investigating these events for years, but YOU are going to find something, anything, to point to instead huh?
 
Bayou Tiger said:
From the article you linked....


Alexander Wendt, an international relations professor at Ohio State University who has become a prominent amateur ufologist, pointed to the reactions of the military pilots as a sign that these new UFOs should be taken seriously.

"I challenge anybody to do better than the Navy to explain what's in those videos. If the Navy couldn't do it..." Wendt told Salon, before adding that "they had every reason to want this off their plate."

As Wendt pointed out, "I think what's unique about these Navy videos is that the whole issue arose from the pilots... I think the upset pilots is really a key thing. These guys are the experts on what's in the sky. They have thousands of hours of experience flying up there. You see some of the interviews with these pilots and they think something is going on, and they were the ones that pushed this whole issue to the front."
Click to expand...
"professional skeptic" + Salon = a sea of bullshit.
Bayou Tiger said:
Well no longer are you claiming it's something with "flir" now it's a mirage? Next you'll claim its swamp gas huh?


Experienced pilots, men of impeccable character, have claimed to have seen these objects with their own eyes.

The military, in secret, has been investigating these events for years, but YOU are going to find something, anything, to point to instead huh?
Click to expand...
What did the dude from Blink 182 conclude?
 
Bayou Tiger said:
Well no longer are you claiming it's something with "flir" now it's a mirage? Next you'll claim its swamp gas huh?


Experienced pilots, men of impeccable character, have claimed to have seen these objects with their own eyes.

The military, in secret, has been investigating these events for years, but YOU are going to find something, anything, to point to instead huh?
Click to expand...

I didn't say their both mirage and flir events.

Dozens of satellites are launched annually. Their spend boosters frequently stay in orbit for months, even years. As their orbit decays and they fall back to earth, they break up and with air currents the pieces fly off in different directions at great speed. The sun reflects off these pieces and if someone is looking up and spots these events, he can be decieved into thinking it's a controlled vehicle traveling at great speed then making radical turns at high speed. That's all a lot of this is. Misinterpretation of physical events.
 
jvett77 said:
I didn't say their both mirage and flir events.

Dozens of satellites are launched annually. Their spend boosters frequently stay in orbit for months, even years. As their orbit decays....
Click to expand...

Space gas. hahaha
 
alien sigourney weaver GIF
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top