The loser of the SECCG will get the no. 5 or 6 seed. They will not move a third B1G team that stayed at home in front of a CCG loser. No. 5 and 6 seeds will almost always be the SEC/B1G CCG loser or ND ranked 4th or better.
Doesn’t matter … a team that doesn’t play in a CCG will not move ahead of an SEC CCG loser IMO. That loss will not matter unless they lose by 30 or something.
Maybe.....but it's likely Penn St only has 1 loss....if Oregon beats Ohio St for a 2nd time, then maybe the SECt loser gets 5 or 6. It's more likely the Big schools have only 1 loss.
I favor osu in the rematch in a very pro-osu environment
So now the CFP committee not only has to put the correct number of B1G/SEC teams in the playoffs, they have to put them in a certain order so the two big dogs in the yard won’t fight with each other! Lmao
Reasonable is not allowed in here.
Again, they won't penalize the loser of a CCG. And, the idea that the B1G no. 3 will be ahead of the SEC no. 2 before conference championship wee requires that your top 3 teams don't lose to each other, or lose other games. I suppose that's possible, but not likely. If that desont' happen, it doesn't say much for your strength of conference, or you scheduling.
My point on this has been clear all along. if the SEC/B1G are now playing schedules without divisions, and with the best teams from the other conferences now being in their conference, there will be more losses. If the committee does not take that into consideration, there will not be a committee in 2026. I can't see that this is a controversial position. The difference in quality teams between the P2 and the other 2 P4 is huge now. The best P2 teams are going to lose more games than they have in the past, and teams in the ACC as an example still have an easy road against weak IC competition. If the committee doesn't take that into account, the P2 will mandate AQs, at least 3 or 4. I have also said I hate they idea of 4 AQs,and 3 even makes me uncomfortable. But the facts of life are that when one conference has 6-8 quality teams, and the ACC has 2 at most, and we aren't even sure the B12 has 2, you are comparing Peaches to Oranges (see what I did there?) if you just look at losses.
And, those losses should be taken into consideration. You will have to deal with losing to UNI at home. Hell, maybe the SEC teams suck this year. But top teams in the SEC have taken care of business, for the most part in OOC:
We'll see, but if the B1G has three teams with one loss, is that a reflection of how good they are or how weak the rest of the B1G is? If the SEC has a bunch of teams with two losses, is that a reflection of them having more good teams or that they aren't as good as people are saying they are? That's the committee's job, and they better do more than just go by the number of losses.
Truthfully, MSU was at the bottom of the list and I didn't get to them.Why did you leave Toledo 'crushing' Mississippi St. 41-17 in Starkville off there?
Just an oversight?
Believe what you want, but that is what happened. And I still don't think the Toledo win means anything even though it appears vitally important to you. If you can't tell me you believe Toledo is better than UGA then just drop it. it was a meaningless game.Odd that you made it all the way down 15 spots to Auburn, but not one more to Mississippi St. at 16.
View attachment 126665
