Don't be so literal ... you are picking the 2nd to worst B1G team. When they play the middle of the pack B1G teams the numbers will be greater. Again, the B1G didn't get the big bucks because they don't watch. Meanwhile, lool at where most your teams are ... they would be the bottom of the B1G.
i litterally picked the team you picked and put the exact numbers of last year. im not trying to spin anything. Purdue cal doesnt move the needle anymore than Illinois Cal indiana Cal maryland cal will.
One day we will have unequal revenue between the have and have nots..
Which is why I said don't be literal. I pulled some teams out of thin air for examples, I wasn't comparing numbers at the time and Purdue came to mind. If you don't understand the concept that I am talking about - Fox putting together 3 really good games to win Saturday night, I can't help you. Obviously they aren't going to get the better B1G teams to play at 9pm, but they can get some central time teams to play at 8pm and that opens up a lot of the middling B1G teams that will do way better than any PAC teams.
Dude, you've already killed two leagues and this is exactly how it starts. Now we need you to go back to the corner and sit the fuck down.
I’ve thought so for a while now. But now I’m thinking the unequal revenue will only be between conferences…which is already here. I believe the historically ingrained have nots in the B1G and SEC will be there “til Gabriel blows his horn.” I know you’ll get that teference.
Now that USC and UCLA are gone, for the most part. Again, the B1G contract is double or more yours. Why is that? Because more people watch their games. A lot more. So, yes, they will do way better on Saturday nights than the PAC did. If you want me to type that Oregon v. Cal would draw better than Rutgers v. Cal, okay. But you are just being pedantic and you know it.
Utah doesn't have the gravitas that Cal has. Not sure Utah is AAU. If the B1G were to take 4 more teams from the PAC, they are more likely to do that with a few teams that are more academic in nature that the Presidents want. Cal Berkely fits that mold to the T.
See earlier in the thread. You know I am a rule no. 1 guy - it has to be about the money. But, I posited a situation where practicality required a western division for non-football sports, along with the egos of the Presidents, that might make them grab UO, UW, Cal and Stanford. Of particular interest to me was the value of owning Saturday night.
Yes, they got more money because even their middling teams are as good as your high end teams when you look at it collectively. You are being pedantic and I am not going to get into single game details, etc. My point was very simple and you are getting way too far into he weeds.
