do you remember the old rumor that Marilyn Manson once took out a rib so he could do it?
Where's the Moon Landing Was Fake thread?
- Thread starter JuiceTheGator
- Start date
do you remember the old rumor that Marilyn Manson once took out a rib so he could do it?
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 16,403
- Reaction score
- 27,575
- Bookie:
- $ 200.00
Proper stretching would’ve saved him a large medical bill.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 13,199
- Reaction score
- 16,783
- Bookie:
- $ 1,354.00
Low motherfucking blow....
Can you spot the empty mug?
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 13,199
- Reaction score
- 16,783
- Bookie:
- $ 1,354.00
Middle-down left edge, dark red mug.Can you spot the empty mug?
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 12,513
- Reaction score
- 16,797
- Bookie:
- $ 500.00
You also need a long wiener.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 16,403
- Reaction score
- 27,575
- Bookie:
- $ 200.00
Suckin your own dick is but one of many things you can do with a long wiener
Better question is, where is the “OP is a homosexual troll” thread
The more I look into the moon landing the more I do wonder. I mean, we had the technology in 1969 to get there, but we have never sent humans back there. No other country has sent humans there since 1969?
You look at some of the photos and the spacecraft stuff looks like piles of junk put together and you are telling me it took humans to the moon? Looking at the photos the surface of the moon also looks non-natural.
People will say there is no reason for us to send humans back to the moon because it is too dangerous and we can just send robots to explore. But really? We sent humans in 1969 up there in what appears to be less than ideal equipment, and 50+ years we've decided we can't do it again?
Also there is zero stars in any photographs or video from on the moon. I've seen people respond to this that it has something to do with the technology of the camera or something that can't pick up stars. What?? We just sent multiple people to the moon and we don't have the technology that can capture stars in the background?! I drive 15 minutes out of town on a clear night and the sky is full of stars, but being up on the moon where there is zero artificial light and it can't pick up one star?
Anyways, I don't know, never thought I would be in the camp that thinks the moon landing was fake, but I have become highly skeptical.
You look at some of the photos and the spacecraft stuff looks like piles of junk put together and you are telling me it took humans to the moon? Looking at the photos the surface of the moon also looks non-natural.
People will say there is no reason for us to send humans back to the moon because it is too dangerous and we can just send robots to explore. But really? We sent humans in 1969 up there in what appears to be less than ideal equipment, and 50+ years we've decided we can't do it again?
Also there is zero stars in any photographs or video from on the moon. I've seen people respond to this that it has something to do with the technology of the camera or something that can't pick up stars. What?? We just sent multiple people to the moon and we don't have the technology that can capture stars in the background?! I drive 15 minutes out of town on a clear night and the sky is full of stars, but being up on the moon where there is zero artificial light and it can't pick up one star?
Anyways, I don't know, never thought I would be in the camp that thinks the moon landing was fake, but I have become highly skeptical.
We've been to the Moon 6 times. The last one being in 1972, not 1969.
There are plans to send people back to the moon underway scheduled for November 2024.
This has been explained numerous time for anyone with a functioning brain.
Why Aren't There Stars in the Moon Landing Photos?
A vocal minority believes that the moon landing was all an elaborate hoax filmed on a sound stage in Hollywood, but it's no hoax. Here's why...
www.discovery.com
Only the dumbest of the dumb think the moon landings were actually faked. However, it has been proven that a couple of the publicity photos were faked.
LOL this contradicts your entire post with posting facts. So the people who have admitted some of the publicity photos have been fake are also the ones telling you all the facts about the moon landing.We've been to the Moon 6 times. The last one being in 1972, not 1969.
There are plans to send people back to the moon underway scheduled for November 2024.
This has been explained numerous time for anyone with a functioning brain.
Why Aren't There Stars in the Moon Landing Photos?
A vocal minority believes that the moon landing was all an elaborate hoax filmed on a sound stage in Hollywood, but it's no hoax. Here's why...
Only the dumbest of the dumb think the moon landings were actually faked. However, it has been proven that a couple of the publicity photos were faked.
I dont know if the video of the astronauts on the moon was also faked or "reproduced" but there are even some questions within that. Look at that video and how can they transmit video of them on the moon but not much of anything else?
The faked photos have been outted for a very long time and they are the ones dumbasses keep clinging to. NASA has even said those particular photos were never meant to be construed as real. They were for publicity only ... like for posters and shit.
What?
The article about no stars is again, not anything that reassures it wasn't fake. So again, technology in 1969 was able to capture these almost HD style photographs and their main "mission" was to get the surface of the moon, but nothing of the stars? Not even one curious shot taken of the stars? Wouldn't it be cool to see what maybe other planets could look like from the location of the moon?
And that article, look at that space craft. Even more reason to think no F'n way that thing makes it through the stratosphere at blazing speeds and makes it through the travels to the moon and then can direct itself back to Earth and make a safe Earth landing.
And that article, look at that space craft. Even more reason to think no F'n way that thing makes it through the stratosphere at blazing speeds and makes it through the travels to the moon and then can direct itself back to Earth and make a safe Earth landing.
Here, read this before you get any dumber.
www.rmg.co.uk
Moon landing conspiracy theories, debunked
The Moon landings were faked. Apollo 11 didn't happen. Humans never set foot on the Moon. Heard all this before?
Just because you don't understand things does not mean they are fake.
The distance between Earth and Moon is almost 239,000 miles and their radio communication is clear as if they were one room away. Truck drivers CB radios 500 miles away aren't even this clear.
You're just posting articles, same articles and from same outlets that have told us for 50+ years the moon landing wasn't fake. Just tune out the media noise for a moment and look at the videos and photos, look at the equipment, look at the surface, think for yourself for a second that if this could actually be conquered and accomplished in 1969 and tell me your own opinion as to why it isn't fake?
We can literally see the stuff we left there.
Can we now? How is it that Russia and China, two major countries who were also competing to get to the moon first, 50+ years later have yet to send a human there.
Did they just give up and ask what is the point now that the USA has done it?