Just wondering - how do you know these guys are "silent commits"? What's the point? How do you know he's not a "silent commit" to Missouri? From what I see, the "Lead Experts" are split, and Fong has a way lower hit rate than Trieu.
We have a couple of inside guys on surly who are close to IT analysts..
But why silent? What's the point? This phrase always came off as one people like to use to make themselves sound smarter than they are. Then if/when it isn't true, it's just "oh something changed last second".
I can't tell you the number of times absolutely confirmed insiders at UGA have said on boards that a commit is silent. I'd put the success rate of those at about 60%. In the NIL era, it's going to be worse. If a kid isn't solid enough to go public with it, he's totally ripe to be hit with a NIL package that changes his tune. No idea here, and Mizzou would not normally be the team I'd worry about, but it is his home state, they have a high school NIL law that gets him paid NIL now IF he goes to a state school eventually.
the high school NIL dwindles as the days go bye... he's an early enrollee
It ain't a matter of time. It's not like he's really hawking sub-samiches for a sub-shop. Some Mizzou alum gives him $50K for showing up and doing a PSA or something.
lol.. maybe..or maybe he comes to Austin not for money, but the PRIVILEGE of playing for the Greatest school in the Planet!!!!!
maybe? I don't think we have any kids head to head for this class anymore.. maybe next class?
He give you a TL on when they expect him to announce?
mizzu giving him a lot for him to stay there...
that's an australian not a bloody bloke
