Direct Pay to Players

lol. Auburn fan's, whose school openly flaunted that they bought Cam Newton and the title he brought, being upset about paying players is funny to me. It's just as funny as the garden gnome in Tuscaloosa who rants and rails against it because it interferes with his patented system of buying players.
My issue isn't with paying players and my issue issue isn't with the portal. My issue IS having no salary cap and unrestricted free agency which is a horrible idea for any league.

Do this in the NFL and see what happens.
 
Do you not see how silly it is to mandate OOC schedules against P5 schools when the SEC doesn't mandate 9 games?

The true course of action should be the top 80 or so breaking away and only playing each other. Sorry for your low budget football program bruh...not our job to prop it up.

And I say this fully as someone who graduated from Toledo

who btw...our qb just entered the portal...and hey...who the fuck can blame him. No one knows who the fuck Dequan Finn is.
9 conference games are stupid. Play 8 and 2 P5 OOC games
 
My issue isn't with paying players and my issue issue isn't with the portal. My issue IS having no salary cap and unrestricted free agency which is a horrible idea for any league.

Do this in the NFL and see what happens.
The NFL operated that way for many years. MLB operates just fine.

I do agree that a cap needs to be in place, but that would require the outright paying of players and the oversight that would come with it.
 
My issue isn't with paying players and my issue issue isn't with the portal. My issue IS having no salary cap and unrestricted free agency which is a horrible idea for any league.

Do this in the NFL and see what happens.
Yup. All of these things would have evolved and been sorted out naturally but for the schools/ncaa keeping indentured servants for several decades
 
Let me know when a team playing 9 conference games wins a natty

so your argument is more top games but not within conference

seems rational

Hey guys we are going to have the NBA East play 8 fewer games against NBA teams and they will play teams in Turkey while the NBA West plays all NBA teams
 
so your argument is more top games but not within conference

seems rational

Hey guys we are going to have the NBA East play 8 fewer games against NBA teams and they will play teams in Turkey while the NBA West plays all NBA teams
Top OOC matchups are the best part of a dying sport.

Roundball is stupid regardless of schedule
 
hence why breaking away from the G5 trash and FCS altogether is necessary.
 
They are proposing forming a new division of large schools where this would go into effect so as not to kill the small schools. If the large schools start paying the players and movement is reasonably restricted NIL will mostly disappear and become more of what it was supposed to be where advertisers pay it, not school collectives (which is so much horseshit).
The new division of larger schools would go even further into killing smaller schools. At least the Purdues, Boston Colleges, Kansas States, and Vanderbilts of the world could latch onto their conference mates for payouts. When the new division of larger schools forms, who is going to watch Northwestern play Cal? Those programs won't get televised, won't have the money to travel, and will basically just fade into FCS world at best.
 
I'd say football and all D1 basketball fit the bill entirely, look how much money and how monetized the "Road to the Final Four" is. I'd say baseball and hockey are probably also ones where money talks, and track at some schools.
As long as the public schools that are part of this new division keep funneling money to the rest of the sports at their schools that lose money every year, they'll be fine. It's going to take a lot of restructuring at some places that have taken on debt banking on that conference cash (Arizona, for example, is already up shits creek due to poor money management).
 
I would do 8 team conferences and play round robin. Conference champs go to a real playoff and we get a no argument national champion.
 
I would do 8 team conferences and play round robin. Conference champs go to a real playoff and we get a no argument national champion.
Impossible to do without having conferences with no geographical ties. The talent is almost entirely concentrated east of the Mississippi, and mostly in the SE more specifically. Unless you're having Georgia, Miss St, Kansas State, Arizona, BYU, Boston College, Maryland and Wisconsin type divisions it would never fly.
 
The NFL operated that way for many years. MLB operates just fine.

I do agree that a cap needs to be in place, but that would require the outright paying of players and the oversight that would come with it.
No one has had unrestricted free agency.

Outright paying of players is what they are suggesting.
 
Yup. All of these things would have evolved and been sorted out naturally but for the schools/ncaa keeping indentured servants for several decades
No one was an indentured servant.
 
No one was an indentured servant.
“Come over here, and toil for our profit, and risk injury, and only get room and board, all for a chance at a better life afterward.”
 
The new division of larger schools would go even further into killing smaller schools. At least the Purdues, Boston Colleges, Kansas States, and Vanderbilts of the world could latch onto their conference mates for payouts. When the new division of larger schools forms, who is going to watch Northwestern play Cal? Those programs won't get televised, won't have the money to travel, and will basically just fade into FCS world at best.
this is 100% correct.

i'm a UNC-Charlotte grad and I don't follow their athletics programs at all. they aren't ever going to be nationally relevant, so what's the point? once you kill off the weaker teams in the ACC + Big 12, their alums and fans are going to follow suit. college sports can be addicting, but at some point, you're going to stop watching if your team doesn't even have a prayer of being nationally relevant.
 
“Come over here, and toil for our profit, and risk injury, and only get room and board, all for a chance at a better life afterward.”
One they didn‘t have to play
Two they got a lot more than room and board
Three they had the freedom of choice

It’s a ridiculous assertion.
 
Back
Top