Poll So its Michigan v Washington for all the marbles

Who you want?

  • Michigan

    Votes: 21 29.6%
  • Washington

    Votes: 40 56.3%
  • Don't care, pass the tater salad

    Votes: 10 14.1%

  • Total voters
    71
Such an aversion to giving UW any credit he'd rather eat shit on his talking points over the past two months.

It's for the best, got us this far, but Jesus H. It's okay to acknowledge an undefeated team heading into the championship game is pretty good and has merit.
Worked out well for you guys against Oregon & Texas, keep it up.
 
Such an aversion to giving UW any credit he'd rather eat shit on his talking points over the past two months.

It's for the best, got us this far, but Jesus H. It's okay to acknowledge an undefeated team heading into the championship game is pretty good and has merit.
You'd think they had played an entire schedule of FCS teams instead of having a Top 5/10 SoS wouldn't you?
 
I'll be pulling for Warshington for obvious reasons.

Will be interesting to see if their offense can stand up to Michigan's front 7. They'll need to score points because I get the feeling Michigan's O-Line is going to bully the huskies around the park.
 
I think this is a really evenly matched game.

Even tho my team lost I do think this is a good matchup for College Football. I can see how it can become boring when the National Champ every year has been the SEC, Ohio State, or Clemson for the last 17 or so years
 
I think this is a really evenly matched game.

Even tho my team lost I do think this is a good matchup for College Football. I can see how it can become boring when the National Champ every year has been the SEC, Ohio State, or Clemson for the last 17 or so years
Fuck all the whiners ... you win and you belong ... College Football has the best rivalries and the best traditions. Anyone bored with that is not worthy.
 
Is this cheating 1. Buying a recruit a cheeseburger and 2. Decoding signs displayed in front of 50,000+ people and national television. Then I accept the punishments and apologize. Feel better?

1. Kind of depends. If the recruit isn't there on an official visit, then it is a violation to buy him anything. Is it cheating? It can be because it's providing an impermissible benefit. Now, if it was enough to get the recruit to sign...I'd hope it was a really, really good cheeseburger. lol

2. Yeah, that's cheating...the 50,000 in the stands can't even see the signs without binoculars and they don't show much of teams signaling in plays on tv. So, if there were people there trying to decode another teams' signals on Michigan's behalf...yes, that is cheating.
 
1. Kind of depends. If the recruit isn't there on an official visit, then it is a violation to buy him anything. Is it cheating? It can be because it's providing an impermissible benefit. Now, if it was enough to get the recruit to sign...I'd hope it was a really, really good cheeseburger. lol

2. Yeah, that's cheating...the 50,000 in the stands can't even see the signs without binoculars and they don't show much of teams signaling in plays on tv. So, if there were people there trying to decode another teams' signals on Michigan's behalf...yes, that is cheating.

It's literally in black-and-white in the rules.

The problem is as the story gets put on the backburner, Michigan fans (i.e. maze&blew) read tweeter pages like MGoBlue that plant distractions and mental gymnastics into their heads and they come here to regurgitate said BS.

One more time.....

"11.6.1 Off-Campus, In-Person Scouting Prohibition. Off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents (in the same season) is prohibited."


It does not matter if the rule should be done away with, that it was a lowly staffer doing it without Harbaugh's knowledge, or that helmet communications should be used.

What matters is that a rule was BROKEN as it's currently written.
 
Back
Top